The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas software 9.4 version

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS software 9.4 version is a comprehensive statistical analysis and data management software package. It provides tools for data manipulation, statistical modeling, reporting, and analytics. The software is designed to handle large and complex data sets from various sources.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

15 protocols using sas software 9.4 version

1

Genetic Factors in Neuroblastoma Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The deviation of the SNP genotypes from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using the goodness-of-fit χ2 test in controls. Two-sided chi-square test was conducted to compare the distribution of demographic variables and allele frequencies between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P values were calculated. Testing for association between SNPs and neuroblastoma risk was performed using unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age and gender. Stratified analyses were also conducted by age, gender, tumor sites, and clinical stages. Analyses were carried out using the version 9.4 SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The significant threshold was P< 0.05 (two-sided).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Allergy Risk Association with SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The goodness-of-fit χ2 test was used to verify whether the included SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) among the control subjects. The distributional differences of demographic characteristics and allele frequencies between AR cases and controls were evaluated by the two-sided chi-square test. The associations between selected SNPs and AR risk were assessed by calculating the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in an unconditional logistic regression model. And the adjusted ORs and corresponding 95% CIs that adjusted for age and sex were calculated through unconditional multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, stratification analysis was conducted according to age, gender, and clinical grading.
The version 9.4 SAS software (SAS Institute, NC, USA) was used for conducting all statistical analyses in this study. It would be considered a statistically significant result when P-value < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Variants and Ovarian Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were evaluated for each SNP in controls by goodness-of-fit χ2 test. Two-sidedχ2 test and t test were performed, as appropriate to compare the demographic variables and allele frequencies between the cases and the control group. The odds ratio (OR), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each SNP were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between SNPs and epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility. Statistical adjustment for age was performed. The version 9.4 SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to perform analysis. The significant threshold was P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Erythropoietin and Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All variables were presented with numbers and percentages, compared between EPO user and non-EPO user cohorts. The standardized difference was estimated to show the balance of variables between two cohorts, the standardized difference over 0.1 was considered a significant difference. We calculated the incidence of AMD using the number of individuals diagnosed with AMD divided by the follow-up duration (person-year) for both cohorts. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-dependent covariate were used to calculate the EPO cohort to the comparison cohort crude hazard ratios (cHRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of AMD, respectively. The aHRs were calculated after controlling for sex, age, and all comorbidities in the multivariate Cox models. The association between EPO treatment and AMD risk was assessed not only by the EPO dosage, but also by the AMD subtype. To observe the dose–response relationship between EPO dosage and risk of AMD, the linear trend test was used to estimate the potential trends. We used the Version 9.4 SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) for data analyses. Unless otherwise specified, a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Longitudinal Analysis of Factors Affecting Medical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A generalized estimating equation (GEE) Poisson regression was applied for the analysis. Poisson regression with a log link function and an unstructured (UN) working correlation matrix, which had the lowest Quasi-likelihood under Independence Model Criterion (QIC) statistics, was used for the longitudinal data (from 2018 to 2021). The results are presented as adjusted relative risk (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted to determine the detailed effects based on transfer time to the medical institutions and the covariates. As the variance inflation factors (VIF) for all variables were less than 1.6, there was no evidence of multicollinearity. Version 9.4 SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA) was used. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Randomized Design and ANOVA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were subjected to a completely randomized design and the data obtained were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by a general linear model (GLM) procedure in SAS software 9.4 Version (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The statistical model used was: Yij = µ + Ti + eij. Where Yij is the mean of the j-th observation of the i-th treatment; µ is the sample mean; Ti is the effect of the i-th treatment; and eij is the effect of the error. Histogram distribution and quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots of the model were used for the assumption of normality. Duncan multiple range test was used to separate means at p < 0.05 significance level. The results are presented as mean ± SEM in all tables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Oral Cancer Mortality Trend Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ITS model was constructed using the log-linear regression model with a simple linear spline function: log(rij)=μ+αi+β1Tj+β2(Tjt1)++β3(Tjt2)++εij,
where rij denotes the oral cancer mortality rate at the ith age group (i = 1, 2, …, I) and jth period group (j = 1, 2, …, J), μ is the intercept, αi is the age effect at the ith age group, Tj=j , (Tjt1)+=max{0,(Tjt1) } and (Tjt2)+=max{0,(Tjt2) } are the spline functions which use two knots of t1 and t2 as the time points of 1999 and 2007, respectively. Here, 1999 was the launch year of the screening program, and 2007 was the year the screening coverage rates began to rise (see Figure S3 in the Supplementary Material). The parameter β1 refers to the linear slope of oral cancer mortality from 1991–1999, β2 refers to the slope changes of oral cancer mortality from 1999 to 2007, and β3 refers to the slope changes of oral cancer mortality after 2007. All data organization and statistical analysis were performed by using SAS software 9.4 version (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Factors Associated with Good Outcome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistics were performed using SAS software 9.4 version (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Categorical variables are displayed as the number and percentage of patients (n, %), and quantitative variables are presented as the median and interquartile range.
We explored factors associated with good outcome using univariate and multivariate stepwise logistic regression. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) are given with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We used a structured approach to select variables to be included in the multivariate model, associating literature search and exchange between experts in order to identify the relationships between the variables and include relevant factors in the model (patient and stroke characteristics). We entered in the multivariate model baseline demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics (age, sex, center, pre-stroke mRS, NIHSS and ASPECT scores, and occlusion site), stroke risk factors, procedural variables (intravenous thrombolysis, successful recanalization, and time from admission to groin puncture), and ICH as explanatory variables. Interactions were tested and multicollinearity was screened using the COLLIN option on SAS. Significance level was set at α = 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analyzing Immune Markers in SLE Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Numerical data between patients and HC or between different patient groups were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test. Correlation analysis was performed by Spearman correlation coefficient test. For comparing SNHG16, TLR4 and TRAF6 levels in PBMC or PBN from SLE and HC, and SNHG16, TLR4 and TRAF6 levels in PBMC or PBN from SLE and SLEDAI-2K, multivariable analysis adjusted for age/sex or plus medications were performed by SAS software 9.4 version (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA). Hemorrhage frequencies in the lungs between different mouse groups were compared by Fisher’s exact test. Differences in other analyses were determined by Student’s t test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant in this study with symbols as * for p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and *** for p < 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Association between Health Screening and Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software 9.4 version (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). After the distribution of variables was standardized, continuous variables were subjected to t-tests and categorical variables were subjected to chi-square tests. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed after adjusting for age, duration of stay, nationality, residence, economic status, eligibility for general health screening, occupation, and comorbidity. To account for the effect of general health screening, participation in the general health screening was stratified, and multiple logistic regression was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!