The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cfx manager 3

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, Canada, China, Germany, Spain, France

The CFX Manager 3.1 software is a data analysis and instrument control software designed for use with Bio-Rad's real-time PCR detection systems. It provides users with tools for setting up experiments, collecting and analyzing data, and managing experimental results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

712 protocols using cfx manager 3

1

Quantitative RT-PCR Protocol for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse transcription (RT) was performed with 1 μg of DNase I-treated RNA following standard procedures with random hexamer primers and iScript reverse transcriptase (BioRad). Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) reactions were performed using primer pairs targeted at specific transcripts (Table S1). Amplification was performed using a CFX Connect Real Time System (Bio Rad), and data were analyzed using BioRad CFX Manager 3.1. Results were analyzed using the Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.1 software. RNA levels were normalized to 18S rRNA using the standard curve method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Thermal Stability Assay of RORγt-LBD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TSA were performed
using 40 μL samples containing 5 μM RORγt-LBD, 10
μM compound, and 2.5x SYPRO Orange (Sigma) in buffer containing
150 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), and 1% DMSO. Hard-Shell 96-well
PCR plates (low profile, thin wall, skirted, green/white #hsp9645)
were used. The samples were heated from 25 to 80 °C at a rate
of 0.5 °C per 5 s in a CFX96 touch real-time PCR detection system
(Bio-Rad). After each increment, SYPRO Orange intensity was measured
using the plate read option in Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.1. Melting temperatures
were determined by Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.1 software in negative mode.
The data were recorded in triplicate in three independent experiments
(one representative data set shown). Error bars represent the SD of
the mean.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Gene Expression in Tomato

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR were performed as described14 (link),58 (link),59 (link). Briefly, cDNA was synthesized using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Real-time PCR primers for pin1, pr1a1, bHLH3, bHLH6, PL, and PE were designed with Beacon Designer software (Premier Biosoft International) avoiding template secondary structure (Table 2). Primer efficiencies (Table 2) were calculated using serial dilutions of MoneyMaker genomic DNA and CFX Manager 3.0 software (Bio-Rad). Reference transcripts and primers were chosen based on published works: act41 and ubi360 (link). Stable expression between treatments was validated using the Best Keeper program and three independent RNA samples from each treatment per biological replicate. Real-time PCR experiments utilized the CFX96 Real-Time System, and data were analyzed with the CFX Manager 3.0 software (Bio-Rad). The mean Cq of each target transcript was normalized by the mean Cq of each reference gene using the formula: 2(−(Cq target-Cq reference)). As previously described60 (link), we determined the relative expression ratio (RER) of the target gene by dividing the normalized target RNA by a calibrator consisting of the average of the normalized values of the control samples (expression after water treatment in most experiments; expression after infection with wildtype Xhg in the AvrHah1 target experiments (Table 1)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RT-PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNA synthesis was performed using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad) with 1.5 μg total RNA as input. Real-time PCR primers were designed with Beacon Designer software (Premier Biosoft International) avoiding template secondary structure (Table 2). Primer efficiencies (Table 2) were calculated using serial dilutions of MoneyMaker genomic DNA and CFX Manager 3.0 software (Bio-Rad). Reference transcripts were chosen based on published works: act41 and ubi3 (Rotenberg et al., 2006 (link)). Stable expression between treatments was validated using the Best Keeper program and four independent RNA samples from each treatment. Real-time PCR experiments were performed as described (Jahn et al., 2008 (link); Cowles et al., 2016 (link)). Experiments were performed using the CFX96 Real-Time System and analyzed with the CFX Manager 3.0 software (Bio-Rad). The mean Cq of each target transcript was normalized by the mean Cq of each reference gene using the formula: 2(−(Cq target − Cq reference)). As previously described (Rotenberg et al., 2006 (link)), we determined the relative expression ratio (RER) of the target gene by dividing the normalized target RNA by a calibrator consisting of the average of the normalized values of the control samples (expression after water treatment in these experiments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative PCR Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of the qPCR results was performed in analogy to the described earlier method53 (link). PCR efficiency of each reaction was ranged from 92% to 99%. The results from the biological replicates for particular samples were gathered to determine the mean normalized expression and its standard deviation (Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.0). The normalized relative expression of ZsGreen1 from biological replicates for siRNAs and control siRNA was compared at a significance level of 0.05 or 0.01 using Bio-rad CFX Manager 3.0. Statistically significant differences in mean expression between tested siRNAs and control siRNA (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) were observed but not in all samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of mRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells using the RNAsimple Total RNA kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using the TIANScript RT kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturers' protocols. Thermocycling conditions for reverse transcription were as follows: 42°C for 60 min and 85°C for 5 min. The mRNA expression levels were quantified by SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR-Green) kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.) using a Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.0 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Thermocycling conditions for qPCR were as follows: 95°C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 30 sec. Results were confirmed in at least three separate analyses. The sequences of gene primers are shown in Table I. The relative mRNA levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (13 (link)) and normalized to GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotyping of ATP7A and ATP7B Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping for ATP7A:c.980C>T (XM_005641519.1), corresponding to ATP7A:Thr327Ile and ATP7B:c.4358G>A (XM_005633826.1), corresponding to ATP7B:Arg1453Gln, was carried out by Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR according to the manufacturer's instructions (LGC Genomics, United Kingdom) using 2 allele specific forward primers and 1 common reverse primer for each of the genes.
The primer set for the ATP7A variant was: 5′‐GACCAAGTTCATGC TAGTAAAGTACAATGCAAGCTTAGTCAC‐3′, 5′‐CGGAGTCAACGGATTATAGTAAAGTACAATGCAAGCTTAGTCAT‐3′, and 5′‐CCTGGTGATATGGCCTCTATTGCTT‐3′.
The primer set for the ATP7B variant was as follows: 5′‐GAAGGTGACCAAGTTCATGCTGTCCCAGGGCGTGGCCC‐3′, 5′‐GAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTGGTCCCAGGGCGTGGCCT‐3′, and 5′‐ATTGGCATGGATGACCGGCGGT‐3′.
The fluorescence signals were detected by a CFX384 Touch Real‐Time PCR Detection System (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, California) and the results were analyzed by Bio‐Rad CFX manager 3.0 (Bio‐Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Retinal Differentiation Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cultures using RNeasy mini-kit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). The amount of cDNA was normalised to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-actin expression. QPCR reactions were performed on a Biorad CFX 96 Connect Real-Time PCR System using the Quantitect SYBR Green PCR Kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The real-time PCR results were analysed using the Biorad CFX Manager 3.0 to calculate normalized relative expression (ΔΔCq) of target genes normalized to relative expression levels of the reference genes β-actin and GAPDH, using the Pfaffl method (Pfaffl 2001 (link)). All error bars on QPCR graphs were standard errors of the mean. Primers were from Qiagen: β-actin (QT01680476), GAPDH (QT01192646), P0U5F1-octamer binding transcription factor (OCT-4) (QT00210840), PAX6—paired box 6 (QT00071169), RAX—retina and anterior neural fold homeobox (QT00212667), OTX2 orthodenticle homeobox 2 (QT00213129), SIX3 Six homeobox 3 (QT00211897), CRX Cone-rod homeobox (QT01192632), NRL Neural retina leucine zipper (QT01005165), RHO Rhodopsin (QT00035700).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RT-qPCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from in vitro samples using the RNeasy® Plant Micro and RNeasy® Plant Mini kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. cDNAs were obtained from 2 µg of RNA using the Superscript™ II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to Solís et al. (2012) (link). RT-qPCR analyses were performed using the SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR®Green Supermix on the iQ™5 Real-Time PCR Detection Sytem (Biorad). The oligonucleotides used are described in Supplementary Table S2, and qPCR conditions were as previously described (Berenguer et al., 2017 (link)). All qPCRs were run in duplicate, and the Cyclophilin gene was used as the internal reference gene. Transcript levels were normalized to the vacuolated microspore levels. Data were analysed with the Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.0 (3.01224.1015) (Biorad), using the Livak calculation method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Inflammatory Markers in Spinal Cord Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) to isolate the total
mRNA from injured spinal cord segments (1 cm containing and surrounding the
lesioned area) 3 days after SCI. One milliliter Trizol (Life Technologies) was
used to homogenize the tissues, and RNA was extracted according to the
manufacturer's protocol. We synthesized cDNA from 1 μg
total RNA using iScript cDNA synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) after
treatment with DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). We used SYBR-Green based
technology to perform real-time PCR in the CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection
System (Bio-Rad); the following primers were used: nitric oxide synthase 2
(iNOS2) (Fw: AAACCCCAGGTGCTATTCCC; Rv: GAACATTCTGTGCAGTCCCA); monocyte
chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1):( Fw: ACGCTTCTGGGCCTGTTGTT; Rv:
CCTGCTGCTGGTGATTCTCT); Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β): (Fw: TGGCAACT
GTCCCTGAACTC; Rv: GTCGAGATGCTGCTGTGAGA). We analyzed the data using Bio-Rad CFX
Manager 3.0 (Bio-Rad). The gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH)
was chosen as reference. The mRNA level of each target gene was normalized by
GADPH and expressed as 2ΔCt (ΔCt = Ct
target -Ct GADPH). The relative quantity in mRNA levels of tested genes was
determined by the equation: relative quantity =
1000/2ΔCt.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!