The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

110 protocols using humic acid

1

Preparation of NH4+, NO2-, and Humic Acid Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analytical grade ammonium chloride salt (NH 4 Cl) and sodium nitrite (NaNO 2 ) were used for the preparation of the stock NH 4
+ and NO 2 -solutions of 2300 mg N/L, respectively. A stock humic acid solution of 1000 mg/L was also prepared using humic acid with chemical formula C 10 H 12 O 5 N (Sigma-Aldrich). Ammonium, nitrite, and humic acid solutions of different concentrations were prepared by diluting the stock solutions with distilled water. The initial pH was adjusted to the desired value using diluted solutions of HCl or NaOH (0.1 N).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Inhibitory Substances in Oral Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Several potentially inhibitory substances (toothpaste, mouthwash, beer, tea, tobacco dip, cigarette, and coffee) that are likely to be found in the oral cavity were tested in duplicate. The potential inhibitors were consumed by the donor in a manner consistent with reasonable use prior to sample collection. Oral epithelial samples were then collected from the used cups and bottles as described in “Sample Collection” below. To test blood as a potential inhibitor, 5 and 10 µL aliquots of fingerstick blood from a first donor were dried on ceramic tile, and oral epithelial swabs from a second donor were utilized to collect the blood. A total of four donor pairs were tested. Humic acid (Sigma Cat#53680‐10G) prepared at 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, and 3.0 μg/μL was spiked onto swabs containing 3 µL of dried blood and compared with similar samples without Humic acid. The effect of indigo dye was evaluated by processing bloodstains from both new, unwashed dark blue denim and new, unwashed cotton fabrics. Fabric cuttings of the stains were processed as described in “Sample Collection, Blood on Fabric”). A total of 76 samples were included in the inhibitor study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CuO Nanoparticle Stability in NOM and pH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Milli-Q water with a constant ionic strength of 10 mM NaCl was used as bulk solution in the study of pH and NOM effects on the stability of CuO NPs. The bulk solution pH was adjusted with HCl or NaOH solution. The ionic strength and ionic valence of Milli-Q water were adjusted with NaCl or CaCl2 solution at a neutral pH. A stock solution of humic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA) with an initial mass concentration of 1000 mg/L was prepared by dissolving humic acid in Milli-Q water and adjusting solution pH to 7.0 ± 0.1. Then the solution was stirred overnight, and filtered through a 0.45 μm cellulose membrane [53 (link)]. The actual dissolved humic acid concentration in the solution was measured at a wavelength of 254 nm using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Jinghua Technology Instrument Co., Model 752C, Shanghai, China) [48 (link)]. The stock solutions of citric acid and l-cysteine (1000 mg/L) were prepared by dissolving citric acid and l-cysteine in Milli-Q water and adjusting solution pH to 7.0 ± 0.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Methanogenic Growth on Humic Acids and Ferrihydrite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
M. acetivorans strain C2A was cultured anaerobically with acetate (90 mM) in high salt (HS) medium buffered with bicarbonate and an atmosphere of N2/CO2 (80%/20%) as described previously (42 (link)). M. orientis sp. nov. was cultured with trimethylamine (30 mM) in DSM 141c medium buffered with bicarbonate and an atmosphere of N2/CO2 (80%/20%) as described previously (43 ). Mid-log phase cultures were anaerobically harvested and thrice washed with HS or DSM 141c media minus acetate or trimethylamine. Media (10 mL) minus acetate or trimethylamine containing humic acids (0.22 g/L) or ferrihydrite (40 mM) was 10% inoculated with washed cells reaching a final concentration of ~107cells/mL. humic acids were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (CAS No. 1415-93-6). The preparation of electron acceptors is described in SI Appendix. The headspace (40 mL) was filled with 99.9% high-purity methane or 13C-labeled (≥99.0% 13C atom) methane (Isotope, China). The initial pH was 7.2 to 7.4. Incubation was at 37 °C with shaking at 100 rpm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Fungal Diversity in Soil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To count the number of growing fungal colonies, soil samples were processed within 15 days from collection, using the Dilution Plate Technique [33 ], partially following the protocol of Landínez-Torres et al. [34 (link)]. Soil dilutions at 10−3 were prepared for four replicates of each sample, and 100 µL of these dilutions were spread on malt extract agar (MEA; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) plates. Moreover, in order to estimate the number of fungal strains with strong abilities of degrading recalcitrant materials, fungal counts were also performed on humic acid agar (1 g of commercial humic acids, 3.26 g of Bushnell-Haas broth, 15 g of agar; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and lignocellulose agar (4 g of lignocellulose, 3.26 of Bushnell-Haas broth, 15 g of agar) plates [35 (link)]. Inoculated plates were incubated at 25 °C in the dark and observed every day for 2 weeks. The number of developed fungal colonies was expressed as CFU (Colony-Forming Units) per gram of soil dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis of Iron-Humate Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Humic acid (residue on ignition about 20%), FeCl3.6H2O (96% w/w), FeCl2.4H2O, tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) (Si (OC2H5)4), and ammonia solution (NH3.H2O) were obtained from Merck Co., Darmstadt, Germany. To prepare and wash the materials, we used absolute ethanol (96%). All the solutions used in this study were prepared using deionized DI-water. To adjust pH, HCl and NaOH solutions (0.1–1.0 M) were applied. The HA concentration was determined using a UV-Visible Spectrophotometer (CECIL-7100, UK). Furthermore, the residues of iron in the solution were measured by means of atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS, Shimadzu AA 6800).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bisphenol A and Persulfate Oxidation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bisphenol A (BPA, C15H16O2, CAS number: 80-05-7) and sodium persulfate (SPS, Na2S2O8, 99+%, CAS number: 7775-27-1) were purchased from Merck.
Humic acid (technical grade), hydrogen peroxide (30%), sodium chloride (99.8%), sodium hydroxide (98%), boric acid (>99.8%) and sulphuric acid (95%) were also obtained from Merck. Methanol (99.9%) and t-butanol (99%) were purchased from Fluka, while potassium dihydrogen phosphate from Millipore.
All chemicals were used as received, without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fabrication of PES-based Nanocomposite Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PES was obtained from BASF Chemical Co. (Ludwigshafen, Germany). Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were supplied by Nanocyl SA. (Sambreville, Belgium). The 3-methacryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane (MPS) and titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP, 97%) were provided by Wego Chemical Group (New York, NY, USA). N-N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) and humic acid (HA) were kindly obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Toluene, ethyl alcohol, acetone, HCl, and NaOH were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Deionized (DI) H2O was obtained from water purification system, (Synergy System, Merck). Distilled H2O was obtained from our UMK laboratory. Nitrogen gas was obtained from Wellgas Sdn. Bhd. (Simpang Ampat, Malaysia). The PES was oven-dried at 80 °C for 5 h before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Aqueous Synthesis and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zinc oxide (CAS No. 1314-13-2, MF: ZnO, MW: 81.39 g/mol), sodium chloride (NaCl), calcium chloride (CaCl2), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was obtained from Daejung Chemicals (South Korea). Sulfuric acid (H2SO4, purity ≥ 96%) was purchased from Kanto Chemicals (Japan). Humic acid (HA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). The HA was dissolved in de-ionized water (DI; ≥ 18.2 Ω cm−1) and filtered through a 0.45-μm hydrophilic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane to produce a stock DOM solution with a concentration of DOC ≈ 10 mg/L. Other solutions were prepared using de-ionized water and diluted as required.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Amphiphilic DADQs for LB Film Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different amphiphilic DADQs (with single R1 and R2 functional groups structures) for LB film fabrication were used in this study; 1 (2-(4-(5-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-oxazinan-2-ylidene)cyclohexa-2,5dien-1-ylidene)malononitrile), 2 (2-(4-(4-butyloxazolidin-2-ylidene)cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1ylidene)malononitrile) and 3 (2-(4-((hexylamino)(3-hydroxypyrrolidin-1-yl)methylene)cyclohexa2,5-dien-1-ylidene)malononitrile). Synthetic procedures with characterization for 1, 2 and 3 can be found in the SI section.
For exposure to the LB film surfaces, a few non-fluorescent target analytes were judiciously selected and used without further purification and/or manipulation; Human Serum Albumin (HSA) Sigma Aldrich, Humic Acid (HA) Sigma Aldrich, Nickle Oxide (NiO) Sigma Aldrich, Bisphenol A (Bis A) Sigma Aldrich. All the target analytes were dissolved in deionized water to < 1 mM concentrations and deposited in μL volume droplets to pristine LB film surfaces. The LB films were then left to dry before measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!