The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using clone rb6 8c5

1

Flow Cytometry and Immunohistochemistry Antibody Sources

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sources of the antibodies for flow cytometry analysis are listed as follow: mouse Fc Block (1:100; 553142; BD Biosciences), mouse CD45 (1:100; clone 30-F11; Biolegend), mouse Gr1 (1:100; clone RB6-8C5; Biolegend), mouse CD11b (1:100; clone M1/70; eBiosciences), mouse CD11c (1:100; clone N418; Biolegend), mouse F4/80 (1:100; clone MB8; Biolegend), mouse Ly6G (1:100; clone 1A8; Biolegend), mouse Ly6C (1:100; clone HK1.4; Biolegend), human ENTPD2 (1:25; PA5-26333; Sigma-Aldrich), mouse Entpd2 (1:25; ab150503; Abcam), human ENTPD1 (1:100; clone A1; Biolegend), and mouse Entpd1 (1:100; clone Duha59; Biolegend). Sources of the antibodies for immunohistochemistry are listed as follow: human ENTPD2 (1:200; ab150503; Abcam), human GLUT1 (1:1000; ab15309Abcam), and human CA9 (1:500; ab1508L; Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation of Murine Immune Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pancreata and spleens were harvested at indicated time points and mechanically disrupted in RPMI. Pancreata were then subjected to enzymatic digestion using RPMI + 10%FBS + 3.6 mg/mL collagenase D (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Red blood cells from both pancreata and spleens were lysed using red blood cell lysing solution (eBioscience) and the resultant suspension was filtered using a 70-µm cell strainer to remove any resultant debris. Cells were then stained for intracellular and surface antigens as previously described (Surana et al 2014 (link)). The following antibodies were used for surface antigen staining:CD45 (Biolegend; clone 30-F11), CD4 (eBioscience; clone RM4-5), CD8a (Biolegend; clone 53-6.7), CD3 (Biolegend; clone 145-2C11), F4/80 (Biolegend; clone BM8), MHCII (Biolegend; cloneM5/114.15.2), Gr1(Biolegend; clone RB6-8C5), CD11b (Biolegend; clone M1/70), CD11c (Biolegend; clone N418), CD19 (BD Bioscience; clone1D3). In order to isolate CD45+CD3+CD8+ CTLs and CD45+CD3F4/80+ macrophages, CD45+ leukocytes were first divided into CD3+ or CD3 fractions, and the CD8+CD4 subpopulation among CD45+CD3+ cells and the F4/80+ subpopulation within CD45+CD3 cells were collected using BD FACSAria II (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages from Glioblastoma Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total TAMs (CD45+/Gr1/CD11b+/DAPI) were sorted from GBM xenografts through the fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Briefly, GBM xenografts were resected and mechanically dissociated and then digested in HBSS buffer containing DNase I (10 μg/mL, Sigma Aldrich, 10104159001) and Liberase (25 μg/mL, Roche, 5401020001) for 45 min at 37°C, and mixed by pipetting every 10 min. After digestion, cell suspensions were passed through a 70 μm filter, washed with cold PBS, and spun down (800 rpm) for 10 min at 4°C. Red blood cells in the samples were removed with the specific lysis buffer (BioLegend, 420301). The dissociated cells were re-suspended in RPMI 1640 medium and blocked with rat IgG (Santa Cruz, sc-2026) for 15 minutes before staining with specific antibodies for sorting. Antibodies used for FACS include: anti-CD45 (Biolegend, 103127, Clone 30-F11), anti-Gr1 (Biolegend, 108405, Clone RB6-8C5), and anti-CD11b (Biolegend, 101207, clone M1/70). The sorted TAMs (CD45+/Gr1/CD11b+/DAPI) were then used for RNA-seq analyses or the flow cytometric analyses to quantify macrophage phagocytosis of glioma cells in vivo as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages from Glioblastoma Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total TAMs (CD45+/Gr1/CD11b+/DAPI) were sorted from GBM xenografts through the fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Briefly, GBM xenografts were resected and mechanically dissociated and then digested in HBSS buffer containing DNase I (10 μg/mL, Sigma Aldrich, 10104159001) and Liberase (25 μg/mL, Roche, 5401020001) for 45 min at 37°C, and mixed by pipetting every 10 min. After digestion, cell suspensions were passed through a 70 μm filter, washed with cold PBS, and spun down (800 rpm) for 10 min at 4°C. Red blood cells in the samples were removed with the specific lysis buffer (BioLegend, 420301). The dissociated cells were re-suspended in RPMI 1640 medium and blocked with rat IgG (Santa Cruz, sc-2026) for 15 minutes before staining with specific antibodies for sorting. Antibodies used for FACS include: anti-CD45 (Biolegend, 103127, Clone 30-F11), anti-Gr1 (Biolegend, 108405, Clone RB6-8C5), and anti-CD11b (Biolegend, 101207, clone M1/70). The sorted TAMs (CD45+/Gr1/CD11b+/DAPI) were then used for RNA-seq analyses or the flow cytometric analyses to quantify macrophage phagocytosis of glioma cells in vivo as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analysis of IL-22 and IL-17 Production in ILCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD4+ T cells-depleted splenic cells were cultured with IL-23 (20 ng/ml, Biolegend) with or without butyrate (0.5 mM) for 16 h, and then stimulated with ionomycin (750 ng/ml) and phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/ml) for 2 h, followed by addition of brefeldin (BD Biosciences) for another 3 h. After Fc blocking, cells were stained with surface markers (PE/Cy7-anti-Thy1, 1:200, Clone#30-H12, Cat#105326; FITC-lineage (CD3, Clone#145-2C11, Cat#100306; CD11b, Clone#M1/70, Cat#101206; CD11c, Clone#N418, Cat#117306; B220, Clone#RA3-6B2, Cat#103206; F4/80, Clone#BM8, Cat#123108; NK1.1, Clone#PK136, Cat#108706; and Gr1, Clone#RB6-8C5, Cat#108419), 1:100), which were purchased from Biolegend. Cells were permeabilized using Foxp3/Transcription Factor Fixation/Permeabilization set (Cat#00-5523-00, ThermoFisher), followed by intracellular staining (anti-IL-22, 1:200, Clone#1H8PWSR, Cat#12-7221-82, Invitrogen; anti-IL-17, 1:200, Clone#TC11-18H10.1, Cat#506916, Biolegend). For ILC3, cells were also stained with RORγt (1:200, Clone#B2D, Cat#17-6981-82, Invitrogen).
All the events were collected by BD FACS Diva software. IL-22 and IL-17 production in ILCs (Thy1+ Lineage cells), or in ILC3 (Thy1+ Lineage RORγt+ cells) was analyzed using FlowJo. Gating strategies are included in Supplementary Fig. 15.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immune Cell Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell disassociation and flow cytometry was previously described[18 (link)]. Antibodies used are as follow: Fluor® 700 anti-CD45 (1:125, clone 30-F11, Biolegend), V500 anti-CD11b (1:100, clone M1/70, BD Biosciences), FITC anti-Ly6C (1:100, clone HK.14, Biolegend), PE-Cy7 anti-F4/80 (1:80, clone BM8, Biolegend), APC anti-CD11c (1:80, clone N418, Biolegend), and Pacific Blue™ anti- Ly-6G/Ly-6C (Gr-1) (1:70, clone RB6–8C5, Biolegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Murine Hematopoietic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry experiments were performed using a BD FACS Fortessa. Populations of mature blood cells were identified by staining PB and BM for B220 (BioLegend, clone RA3-6B2), CD3 (Thermo Scientific, clone 145-2C11), Gr1 (BioLegend, clone RB6-8C5) and Mac1 (BioLegend, clone M1/70). Analysis of erythroid precursors in PB and BM was conducted with antibodies against Ter-119 (BioLegend, clone TER-119) and CD71 (BioLegend, clone R17217). Stem and progenitor cells in BM were identified as previously described [5 –7 ] by staining with a cocktail against lineage markers (BioLegend, B220, CD3, Gr1, Mac1 and Ter119) as well as for c-Kit (eBioscience, clone 2B8), Sca1 (BioLegend, clone D7), CD34 (BioLegend, clone MEC14.7), Fc-γ-II/III-R (eBioscience, clone 93), Thy1.1 (BioLegend, clone OX7) and Flt3 (eBioscience, clone A2F10). Gating strategies were determined by fluorescence minus one staining [8 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation of Murine Immune Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pancreata and spleens were harvested at indicated time points and mechanically disrupted in RPMI. Pancreata were then subjected to enzymatic digestion using RPMI + 10%FBS + 3.6 mg/mL collagenase D (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Red blood cells from both pancreata and spleens were lysed using red blood cell lysing solution (eBioscience) and the resultant suspension was filtered using a 70-µm cell strainer to remove any resultant debris. Cells were then stained for intracellular and surface antigens as previously described (Surana et al 2014 (link)). The following antibodies were used for surface antigen staining:CD45 (Biolegend; clone 30-F11), CD4 (eBioscience; clone RM4-5), CD8a (Biolegend; clone 53-6.7), CD3 (Biolegend; clone 145-2C11), F4/80 (Biolegend; clone BM8), MHCII (Biolegend; cloneM5/114.15.2), Gr1(Biolegend; clone RB6-8C5), CD11b (Biolegend; clone M1/70), CD11c (Biolegend; clone N418), CD19 (BD Bioscience; clone1D3). In order to isolate CD45+CD3+CD8+ CTLs and CD45+CD3F4/80+ macrophages, CD45+ leukocytes were first divided into CD3+ or CD3 fractions, and the CD8+CD4 subpopulation among CD45+CD3+ cells and the F4/80+ subpopulation within CD45+CD3 cells were collected using BD FACSAria II (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tumor Dissociation and Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse tumor samples were excised and incubated with 10 ml RPMI supplemented with 10 μg/ml DNase I (Sigma Aldrich) and 25 μg/ml Liberase (Roche) for 10–15 min at 37 °C. Tumors were homogenized by pipetting and filtering through a 100-μm nylon filter. Following the dissociation, 5 × 106 cells were pelleted and resuspended in FACS buffer and blocked with monoclonal antibody to CD16/32 (Trustain fcX, Biolegend) for 10 min before staining. All tumors were stained with anti-CD45 (Biolegend, Clone 30-F11), anti-TCRβ(BD, Clone H57-97), anti-NK1.1 (eBioscience, Clone PK136), anti-CD11b (Biolegend, Clone M1/70), anti-F4/80 (Biolegend, Clone BM8), anti-Ly6C (BD, Clone AL-21), anti-CD11c (Biolegened, Blone N418) and anti-Gr-1 (Biolegend, Clone RB6-8C5). Dead cells were eliminated from analysis by excluding Hoechst+ cells. All samples were assayed using a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences), and channel compensations were performed using single-stained UltraComp eBeads (Affymetrix) or cells. Data were analyzed using FlowJo, and outliers in each group were removed using Prism Outlier Calculator (http://graphpad.com/quickcalcs/Grubbs1.cfm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens were dissociated to a single-cell suspension and then filtered using a 70 µm nylon mesh. Cells were counted using trypan blue exclusion assay. A number of 1 × 106 cells were plated and stained with anti-F4/80 (1:100, cloneBM8; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD169 (1:100, clone 3D6.112; BioLegend), CD115 (1:100, clone 3D6.112; BioLegend), Gr1 (1:500, clone RB6-8C5; BioLegend), CD19 (1:100, clone CD5, BioLegend), CD4 (1:100, BM4-5, BD Horizon, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), CD8 (1:200, clone 53-6.7, BioLegend), and NK1.1 (1:100, clone Pk136 BioLegend) for 30 min, at 4 °C. Then, cells were washed and fixed with 2% PFA for 10 min at room temperature (RT). Cells were washed and analyzed using a BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer and FlowJo (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!