The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using biocoat growth factor reduced matrigel invasion chamber

1

Ovarian Cancer Cell Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion assay was carried out in a BioCoat Growth Factor Reduced Matrigel Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences, Cat# 354483) using ovarian cancer cells carrying nonspecific or SHMT1 shRNAs. Briefly 5×104 cells/insert were seeded in triplicate in low-serum medium after 6 hours of serum starvation. The cells were allowed to migrate towards serum-rich medium in the bottom well for 20 hours. The number of cells migrating through the Matrigel was quantified by imaging after DAPI staining; 8–12 fields per membrane were counted, and quantification of nuclei was performed using Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PON2 Regulates Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the wound healing assay, PANC1 cells carrying PON2 or nonspecific shRNAs were grown in 12-well plates until fully confluent. A scratch was created using a sterile 20-μl pipette tip, and the migration of cells into the wound was monitored by light microscopy at 0, 4, and 12 hours. The invasion assay was carried out in a BioCoat Growth Factor Reduced Matrigel Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences, Cat# 354483) using PANC1 cells carrying nonspecific or PON2 shRNAs. Briefly 5×104 cells/insert were seeded in triplicate in low-serum medium after 6 hours of serum starvation. The cells were allowed to migrate towards serum-rich medium in the bottom well for 20 hours. The number of cells migrating through the Matrigel was quantified by imaging after DAPI staining; 8–12 fields per membrane were counted, and quantification of nuclei was performed using Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ovarian Cancer Cell Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion assay was carried out in a BioCoat Growth Factor Reduced Matrigel Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA; cat. no. 354483) using ovarian cancer cells carrying nonspecific or SHMT1 shRNAs. Briefly 5 × 104 cells/insert were seeded in triplicate in low-serum medium after 6 h of serum starvation. The cells were allowed to migrate towards serum-rich medium in the bottom well for 20 h. The number of cells migrating through the Matrigel was quantified by imaging after DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining; 8–12 fields per membrane were counted, and quantification of nuclei was performed using the ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chemoinvasion Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemoinvasion assays were carried out using BioCoat growth factor reduced Matrigel Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA). Cells (0,5 × 105) transiently silenced for YAP, TAZ, β-arr1, and p53, were stimulated with serum-free medium alone or with ET-1 and/or macitentan, added to the lower chamber. The cells were left to invade for 12 h at 37 °C. Cells on the upper part of the membrane were scraped using a cotton swab and the invading cells were stained using Diff-Quick kit (Dade Behring, Deerfield, Illinois, USA). The experiments were performed in sextuplicates. From every transwell, several images were taken under a phase-contrast microscope at ×4 magnification and two broad fields were considered for quantification. Cells were counted by using Image J program. The results of the analysis of the individual photos are depicted as dots in the various graphs, normalized to control and shown as fold of control and quantified using NIH image program (Image J).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Matrigel Invasion Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An invasion assay was performed using a BD BioCoat Growth Factor Reduced Matrigel Invasion Chamber (354483, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were starved in 1640 medium without FBS for 24 h and then plated on the upper insert at 2.5×104/well and incubated in 1640 medium with FBS in 20% or 0.1% oxygen cell chambers, respectively. After a 24-h incubation, the non-invading cells remained on the upper surface of the membrane in each insert were gently removed. Cells that had penetrated through to the bottom surface of the membranes were fixed in 100% methanol and stained with 0.05% Toluidine Blue Solution (206-14555, Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.). For each experiment, the number of cells in seven randomly chosen fields of each filter was quantified, and these experiments were independently performed at minimum of three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Invasion Assay Under Hypoxia Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An invasion assay was performed using a BD BioCoat Growth Factor Reduced Matrigel Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. An equivalent number of cells (5×104/well) was resuspended in serum-free medium, with or without CoCl2 (200 µM), and plated in the upper insert. To further examine the effects of autophagy inhibition on invasion under hypoxia, another group of cells were incubated in the presence or absence of chloroquine (CQ; 10 and 20 µM; Sigma-Aldrich) with 200 µM CoCl2. The insert was then placed inside a 24-well plate. The cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C, following which the upper surface of the membrane in each insert was gently wiped with a cotton swab to remove all non-invading cells. The cells on the under surface were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. The insert was subsequently placed in 0.1% crystal violet (Beijing Chemical Industry Group, Co., Ltd.) to stain the cells. The numbers of cells in seven randomly-selected fields of each filter were estimated by manual counting, and each experiment was performed independently at least three times. Leica-DM4000B microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Invasion Assay with Matrigel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The conventional invasion assay was performed using a BD BioCoat Growth Factor Reduced Matrigel Invasion Chamber (354483, BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) as described previously42 (link). In brief, cells, which were plated on the upper insert at 1 × 105/well with or without nanoparticles, were incubated for 24 h. The invaded cells on the under surface of the membrane were fixed after removing the cells on the upper surface of the membrane in each insert. The number of invaded cells, which were stained with 0.05% Toluidine Blue Solution (206-14555, Wako), was manually counted by microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration was evaluated using a modified wound scratch assay. The cells were plated (5 × 104 for HT29; 3 × 104 for HCT116; 4 × 104 for HCT116 p53−/− cells) in a cell culture dish (Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany) and, when cell confluence was approximately 90%, the chambers were removed and the cells were treated with metformin. The images (magnification 10x) were acquired immediately after removing the chambers, and at the complete closure of the gap in the untreated cells using an inverted EVOSmicroscope (Thermofisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
Cell invasion was evaluated by plating 3 × 104 cells per well in a 24-well BDBioCoat growth factor-reduced MATRIGEL invasion chamber (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and treating them with metformin. Inserts were placed in a well containing 750 µl of normal growth medium with 10% FBS. After 72 hours (HCT116 and HCT116 p53−/− cells) or 96 hours (HT29 cells), the cells in the upper compartment were removed, and the invading cells attached to the bottom side were fixed with cold methanol and stained with Crystal Violet (Sigma-Aldrich). Three independent experiments were carried out.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Silencing E-cadherin Modulates Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stable DACT2-expressing or control HCT116 cells were transfected with 50 nM E-cadherin siRNA (sense: 5'-GAUUGCACCGGUCGACAAA dTdT-3') (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) or control siRNA (RiboBio). Forty-eight hours post transfection, cells were collected for western blot and Transwell assays using a BD BioCoat Growth Factor Reduced MATRIGEL Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences) as described previously.38 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Cell Migration and Invasion Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A wound healing assay was employed as follows; a scratch was made on a uniform layer of cells using a sterile micropipette tip and cells were washed to remove debris. Photographs of the same area of the wound were taken after 4, 8, and 24 hours to measure the width of the wound. For the transwell migration assay, cells were resuspended in serum-free medium and seeded into the insert well of a 24-wells plate (8 μm pores, BD biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for 24 hours. The culture medium containing 10% FBS was used as a chemoattractant and placed in the bottom chamber. Cells were fixed in PFA (4%) and stained in crystal violet (0.5% in 20% methanol). Remaining cells in the upper chamber (non-migratory cells) were removed with a cotton swab. Adherent cells on the bottom of the membrane (migratory cells) were counted under a microscope (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA) and Stereologer System (Dissector, Stereology Resource Center, Inc., Chester, MD). The invasion assay was performed under the same conditions using the BD BioCoat™ growth factor reduced MATRIGEL™ invasion chamber (BD biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!