The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using transcript first strand synthesis supermix

1

Quantitative RT-PCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from tissues or cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and then treated with DNase I (Promega). Reverse transcription of 1 µg of total RNA was performed using Transcript First Strand Synthesis Supermix (TransGen Biotech, AT301) to obtain complementary DNA (cDNA). qRT-PCR was performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) and SYBR Green Supermix (TaKaRa) as described by the manufacturers. Raw data were normalized to GAPDH as the internal control and are presented as the relative expression levels, which were calculated as relative quantification (RQ) = 2−ΔΔCt. All gene-specific primers for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Expression Analysis of Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA quantity and quality were determined by spectrophotometric measurements and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. Then, total RNA was reverse transcribed using Transcript First-Strand Synthesis Supermix (TransGen Biotech). qRT-PCR was conducted using the TransStart Green Q-PCR SuperMix kit (TransGen Biotech) on a CFX96 system (Biorad) and analysis was performed using the 2-(ΔΔCT) method. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. The primer sequences of GAPDH, POLD2, and E2F1 are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative gene expression analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from cell lines or thymus samples using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcripted using Transcript First Strand Synthesis Supermix (TransGen Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) were conducted using 2X Taq PCR MasterMix (TianGen Biotech).
All quantitative PCR (q-PCR) were performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) in SYBR Premix Ex Taq reaction system (TaKaRa). Each sample was analyzed in triple replication. Relative quantification (RQ) was derived from the difference in cycle threshold (Ct) between the target gene and tubulin (ΔCt) as compared to control cell lines using the equation RQ = 2−ΔΔCt. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD), and statistical significance was calculated using a one-tailed, unpaired t-test. Relative mRNA or miRNA expression was summarized using mean ± SEM. All these results were calculated using student t-tests. p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. All the primers are listed in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Kidney Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from kidneys tissue using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Cat. 15596-018), reverse transcription was performed using Transcript First Strand Synthesis Supermix (TransGen Biotech, Cat. AT301), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All qRT-PCRs were performed using a 7900 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), and SYBR Green PCR Master mix was purchased from Applied Biosystems (Applied Biosystems, Cat. 43-676-59). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate or greater replicates. Relative quantification was derived from the difference in the cycle threshold (Ct) between the target gene and GAPDH (ΔCt) and compared with control cell lines using the equation RQ=2-ΔΔCt. Error bars represented the standard deviation (SD), and the significance of any differences was calculated using a two-tailed, unpaired t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Bcl-3 mRNA Expression in Cell Lines and Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from cell lines or patient samples using TRIzol Reagent
(Invitrogen, 15596-018) according to the manufacturer's protocol. To
obtain cDNA, reverse transcription was performed using Transcript First
Strand Synthesis Supermix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China AT301) according
to the manufacturer's instructions, using 1 μg of
RNA as a template. All qRT-PCRs were performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time
PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and all qRT-PCR reagents
and consumables were purchased from Applied Biosystems. For each reaction,
1 μl of RT product was added to
10 μl of 2X SYBR Green Gene Expression PCR Master Mix
and 1 μl of pre-designed and synthesized forward and
reverse primer/probe mix. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate.
Relative quantification (RQ) was derived from the difference in the cycle
threshold (Ct) between the target gene and GAPDH (ΔCt) compared with
control cell lines using the equation
RQ=2−ΔΔCt. Error bars represent the
standard deviation (SD), and the significance of differences was calculated
using a one-tailed, unpaired t-test. The sequences of the primers
are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The
patients were dichotomized on the basis of the mean value of Bcl-3 mRNA
expression, and their survival curves were later analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Gene and miRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA including miRNAs was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. To obtain cDNA, Transcript First-Strand Synthesis Supermix (TransGen Biotech, AT301) was used to generate cDNA following the manufacturer's instructions using 1 μg RNA as the template. Actin was used as an internal control gene. For miRNA, 500 ng total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a specific miRNA stem loop primer. miR-U6 was used as an internal control miRNA. qRT-PCR reagents purchased from TaKaRa and a 7900 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) were used for quantitative real-time reverse transcription (qRT-PCR). All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD), and statistical significance was calculated using a one-tailed, unpaired t-test. The relative quantification (RQ) was derived from the difference in cycle threshold (Ct) between the target gene and internal control (actin or miR-U6) compared to control cell lines using the formula RQ = 2-ΔΔCt. The mRNA and miRNA levels were assessed by SYBR Green–based quantitative real-time PCR with gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of miRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total miRNAs were isolated from cultured cells or surgically resected from fresh NSCLC tissues with a mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNAs were isolated from cell lines with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, 15596-018) as described in the manufacturer's protocols. To obtain cDNA, we performed a reverse transcription reaction with Transcript First Strand Synthesis Supermix (TransGen Biotech, AT301) according to the manufacturer's instructions, using 1 μg total RNAs as the template. For miRNA, 0.5 μg total RNA from each sample was reverse-transcribed to cDNA by means of specific miRNA stem loop primers. All quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), and all qRT-PCR reagents and consumables were purchased from Applied Biosystems and TaKaRa. The mRNA and miRNA levels were quantitatively assessed by SYBR Green-based qRT-PCR with gene-specific primers. The sequences of primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. GAPDH and U6 were used as internal normalization controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!