The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using flatbed scanner

1

Root Morphology Analysis via WinRHIZO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After washing with tap water, the intact root system of each seedling from each pot was placed in a Regent’s water-proof plexiglass tray without root overlap and then scanned by an EPSON Flatbed Scanner, Epson Perfection V700 (Seiko Epson Corp, Japan). The root images were analyzed by the WinRHIZO 2007d (Regent Instruments Incorporated, Quebec, Canada) for root morphological variables, including total length, projected area, surface area, average diameter, and volume. Lateral roots grew on the taproot were gradually defined as 1st, 2nd, and 3rd order, and the number of different order lateral roots was counted through placing experimental tables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Mineralized Matrices In Vitro

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monolayers were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and subsequently fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin for 20 min at room temperature. After several washes with PBS, cell layers were stained with aqueous 1% (w/v) alizarin red solution (Sigma) at pH 4.2 for 10 min at room temperature, before washing with 50% ethanol to remove any unbound stain. Culture wells were scanned using an Epson flatbed scanner (Epson, UK) and photomicrographic image of each culture well was captured to record the distribution of mineral staining. The bound stain was subsequently eluted with 10% cetylpyridinium chloride (Sigma), and the optical density of the resultant solution determined at 595 nm (Tecan Sunrise, Mannedorf, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Leaf Gas Exchange Assessments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaf gas exchange assessments were performed on sunny days between 9:00–11:30 just before harvesting using an LI-6400 XT portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). Measurements were performed on the fully expanded leaves of each sample plant (at least three individual plants per treatment in each chamber) under continuous light photosynthetic photon flux density of 1,500 µmol m−2 s−1, 500 µmol s−1 flow rate, and air temperature of 25 °C. Three of the fully expanded leaves per replicate were excised from atop the stolons and were immediately scanned using an Epson flatbed scanner for calculation of total leaf area (LA) and then dried at 75 °C for 48 h until a constant dry weight (DW). The specific leaf area (SLA) was calculated as the ratio of leaf area to dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optogenetic Yeast Growth Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells bearing LOV2GIVe constructs growing exponentially in SDGalactose media were pelleted as described above (‘Yeast Strains and Manipulations’), and resuspended at equal densities. Equal volumes of each strain were spotted on agar plates in four identical sets. Two of the sets were seeded on SDGalactose-TRP-URA plates with histidine and the other two sets were seeded on SDGalactose-TRP-URA-HIS (supplemented with 5 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole). From each one of the two pairs of sets, one of the plates was exposed to a homemade array of blue LED strips positioned approximately 12 cm above the plates (~2,000 Lux as determined by a Trendbox Digital Light Meter HS1010A) whereas the other one was incubated side by side under the same light but tightly wrapped in aluminum foil. Plates were incubated simultaneously under these conditions for 4 days at 30°C and then imaged using an Epson flatbed scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Growth Assay for Diploid Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diploid yeast cultures were grown overnight in CSM media with proper dropout selection. Overnight diploid yeast cultures were analyzed for OD600 with a biophotometer. All cultures were diluted to 1 OD, following this series dilutions of 1/10, 1/100, and 1/1000 were made for all cultures. All serial dilutions of diploid yeast cultures were plates reciprocally on all CSM selection plates in organized rows utilizing reverse pipetting to ensure uniform cultures. Plates were left open to evaporate excess liquid from cultures and incubated at 30°C. After 2 days of growth on control and selection plates, images were taken using a flatbed scanner (Epson America, Long Beach, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Yeast Vacuolar Dynamics Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pulse-chase labeling of log phase yeast with vacuolar fluorescent dye FM4-64 and fluorescence microscopy imaging were performed as described (Nickerson et al. 2012 (link)), except that cells were grown in nonselective YPD prior to labeling and imaging. DNA in agarose gels was stained using ethidium bromide and visualized using ultraviolet light in a BioRad Chemi-doc system with digital camera and Quantity One imaging software (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). All gel images were exported from Quantity One as .TIFF images, except Figure 2B, which was printed to photographic paper and later scanned in .TIFF format using an Epson flatbed scanner. Images were cropped using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA). Fluorescence microscopy images were overlaid using ImageJ (NIH, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Images were arranged as annotated figures using Canvas Draw 4 vector graphics software (Canvas GFX, Boston, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Soft Agar Clonogenic Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
0.5 ml of cell suspension in 0.36% agarose containing culture media was plated into each well on the top of existing 0.6% bottom agarose in 24-well tissue culture plates. 0.5 ml of culture media containing compound or compound combinations at various doses was then loaded into each well. Plates are incubated in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator for a period of 2 – 4 weeks to allow cell colonies to grow large enough to be visualized through MTT tetrazolium dye staining. At the assay endpoint, 0.04 ml of 5 mg/ml MTT solution (Sigma) were added into each well and further incubated at 37°C for 3 h. Cell colony images of each well were acquired using a flatbed scanner (Epson). The number of colonies formed in each well was then quantified using ImageJ software. Percent cell colony formation was calculated relative to DMSO control treated cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction and Western blotting were performed as previously described (31 (link)). Primary antibodies were diluted to 1:100 for CAV1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 1:500 for COL1A2 (Novus Biologicals), 1:200 for THBS2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and 1:5000 for beta actin (Sigma Aldrich). Anti-mouse (beta actin), anti-goat (THBS2), and anti-rabbit (CAV1, COL1A2) secondary antibodies were used at a concentration of 1:300 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Proteins were visualized by xerography on XOMAT™ AR film using an enhanced chemiluminescence system. Xerograms were digitized with an Epson flat-bed scanner and ImageJ software was used to quantify expression. A Student’s T-test was used to compare protein expression between treatment groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Root Growth and Meristem Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After full germination, root growth was captured by scanning plates with an Epson flatbed scanner and a resolution set to 600 ppi. Primary root length of individual seedlings was then measured using Fiji [99 (link)]. Average root elongation rate (mm/d) was calculated as an average of daily root elongation rates following the protocol described in [100 ].
Primary root apical meristems were analyzed to measure meristematic cortical cell length (μm), meristem size (μm), and meristem cell number by performing a propidium iodide (PI) stain following the protocol described in [101 (link)]. Root tips were examined using a Leica SP2 confocal microscope with a 40× oil immersion objective. The resulting image data was processed with semi-automatic image analysis software, Cell-O-Tape [102 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MALDI-TOF Imaging of Acute MI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging experiments were performed using a Bruker Autoflex Speed MALDI/TOF-TOF mass spectrometer. Before matrix deposition, tissues were scanned using an Epson flatbed scanner and collected at 300 dpi for acquisition of a digital baseline image. The mass spectrometer method was set to collect 5000 spectra/spot and images. Intact protein images were collected using linear mode, and trypsin peptide images were collected using reflectron mode. Calibration was conducted using a mixture of angiotensin II, bovine insulin, PEG 600, and ephrinA1-His standard. All control and acute MI samples were imaged at 100 μm spatial resolution. Data was collected in positive ionization mode and a Nd:YAG laser repetition rate of 2000 Hz was used (50 μm laser size) during image collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!