The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statview version 5

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States, Japan

StatView version 5.0 is a statistical analysis software package developed by SAS Institute. It provides users with a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, visualization, and reporting. The core function of StatView is to enable users to perform a wide range of statistical tests and procedures, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, ANOVA, and more. The software is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive, making it accessible to both novice and experienced data analysts.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

164 protocols using statview version 5

1

Statistical Analysis of Cytokine Profiles in Parasitic Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statview Version 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc.) was used for statistical analysis and GraphPad Prism Version 5.03 and Statview Version 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc.) for graphical representations of box plot and scatter column. Cytokine concentrations were transformed to log 10 function for graphical representation. IL-10/TNFα and IL-10/IL-6 ratios were calculated for each sample. The ranges of cytokine cconcentrations, Plasmodium sp., L. loa and M. perstans parasitaemia and eosinophilia did not follow normal distributions and descriptive analyses of these quantitative variables are presented with medians [interquartile ranges, IQR: 25th - 75th quartiles]. Tests for comparison of cytokines and ratios were performed rstly using the Kruskal-Wallis test for a global comparison, then the Mann-Whitney U test for a comparison of medians of two groups with different infection pro les. In order to perform multivariate analysis, R software was used to build and evaluate some models. F-tests were performed to statistically test the equality of means into different groups, according to age, location, parasitaemia. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered signi cant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotype Analysis in Autoimmune Liver Diseases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were carried out using StatView version 5 software (SAS Institute Inc., Carry, NC, USA). The genotype and allelic frequencies were compared using a chi-squared test of association (Pearson). The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each variable were also estimated. Analysis of genotype frequency in regard to the clinical characteristics and HRQoL assessment of PBC and AIH patients was performed using ANOVA with Fisher’s protected least significant difference (PLSD). Data are shown as medians (and ranges) for demographic data, and as means and standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables of assessing HRQoL. p-values of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Anti-IL-17 Biologics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical indices among patients treated with different anti-IL-17 biologics were compared using analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc comparison tests and chi-squared tests. Student’s t-tests and chi-squared tests were performed to compare DIIP group and non DIIP group. A two-sided p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with StatView, version 5 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Radiological and Bacteriological Severity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Student’s t-tests, or Fisher’s exact tests were performed to compare clinical indices of radiologically severe disease (CT score≧10) and milder disease (CT score<10). Clinical indices of bacteriologically severe group (Gaffky score≧5) and milder disease (Gaffky score <5)were also compared. Regression analysis were performed to estimate the relationship between MDE and CT score, MDE and Gaffky scale. A two-sided p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with StatView, version 5 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Post-ESD Bleeding Risk Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are reported as means, standard deviation, and range, and categorical variables as frequency and percentage. Data for each drug-related group (single APT and DAPT groups) were compared with those for the no APT group. Qualitative variables were compared with Fisher’s exact test or the chi-squared test, and quantitative variables with the unpaired Student’s t test. To evaluate the risk for bleeding after ESD, univariate analysis with a log-rank test and multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards regression model were used. To avoid type I statistical error, fewer than three variables with a P value of less than 0.05 in univariate analysis were examined in the Cox hazards model to identify independent factors associated with post-ESD bleeding. Data were analyzed with StatView Version 5 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). Differences were considered significant at a P value of less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PiB Binding in Cortical Regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
No sample size estimates were obtained prior to this exploratory study because no pilot data were available. Statistical analysis was performed using Statview version 5 (SAS Institute). Data are expressed as medians and ranges, unless otherwise stated. Measures of PiB binding were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, with P < .05 after correction for multiple comparisons considered statistically significant for definitive analyses. Comparisons of [11C]PiB binding in cortical and white matter subregions (eAppendix and eTable in the Supplement) were primarily undertaken to explore the regional distribution of [11C]PiB binding; these exploratory analyses are reported with uncorrected P values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genetic Influences on Aggressive Behaviors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using StatView version 5 (SAS Institute Inc.). Two-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the trial-by-trial change of aggressive behaviors in B6 and B6-Chr15 MSM, and to examine the effect of the genotypes of the resident and the intruder in the homogeneous and heterogeneous set tests. One-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the effect of the genotype of residents paired with OBX ICR male intruders, the effect of the genotype of individuals who were the source of urine applied to B6 intruders, and the effect of genotype in the panel of subconsomic strains or sub-subconsomic strains. In the case of a significant F value, Tukey-Kramer’s t-test was conducted in the homogeneous and heterogeneous set tests in order to compare each pair-type. For the analysis of subconsomic strains and sub-subconsomic strains, we conducted Dunnett’s t-test to detect significant strain differences in comparison with B6 in subconsomic strains and sub-subconsomic strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

COVID-19 Risk Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using StatView version 5 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). All values are expressed as the means ± SDs or SEs. A P value of less than .05 indicated statistical significance. The factors associated with patient characteristics were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the Fisher exact test, or the χ2 test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Univariate logistic regression was performed with the following variables as risk factors for COVID-19: sex (male), age, smoking, ACT score, BEC before biologic treatment, inhaled corticosteroid doses, maintenance OCS, and the number of vaccine doses. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to evaluate the variables that achieved a P value of less than .20 in the univariate models.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Associations in Disease Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using StatView version 5 software (SAS Institute Inc., Carry, NC, USA). The differences in allele frequency and genotype distribution between case and control subjects were compared by a chi-square test of association (Pearson) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Associations between genotyped variants and tested variables were analyzed using nonparametric Mann–Whitney test or with ANOVA test, as appropriate. Data were presented as medians (and ranges) for continuous variables, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The genotype frequencies of the SOCS1 polymorphism were tested for consistency with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using exact tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical calculations were carried out using StatView® version 5 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, US). Actuarial survivals were analysed by the Kaplan–Meier method. All variables that revealed a statistically significant difference on univariate analysis were entered into a Cox proportional hazards regression model for multivariate analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!