The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using mouse igg2a

1

Basophil and Mast Cell Detection in Esophageal Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The polymer peroxidase method was used for immunohistochemical staining of oesophageal biopsies. As the primary antibody, human basophil-specific antibody (BB1, antibasogranulin Ab, mouse IgG2a) at 1:10 dilution was used to detect basophils 16 and antitryptase (mouse IgG2a; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., TX, USA) at 1:500 dilution were used to detect mast cells. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections (5 lm) were deparaffined with xylene, dehydrated with ethanol, pre-treated with 0.1% trypsin in 50 mM Tris-HCl containing 0.1% CaCl 2 for 37 °C at 30 min, and followed by additional treatment with 0.1% saponin in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer for 30 min at room temperature. After immersion of the sections in a blocking agent solution (protein block serum free; Dako Japan, Tokyo, Japan) for 10 min, endogenous peroxidase was inactivated by immersion of sections in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min. They were then incubated with BB1 antibody and a peroxidase-labelled anti-mouse polymer secondary antibody (Histofine Simple Stain MAX-PO (M) kit; Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min, stained with a diaminobenzidine chromogen (Nichirei), and counterstained with haematoxylin. 17 Stained slides were dehydrated and coverslipped. Mast cells were stained using the same protocol as described above, but proteinase K (Dako) was used as an antigen retrieval buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescent Staining of MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSCs were fixed in 4% PFA at room temperature for 15 min and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min. The cells were blocked with 2.5% goat serum for 1 h and then stained with 1:200 anti-Ki-67 mouse monoclonal antibody (M7240; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) overnight at 4°C. Antibody binding was visualized by incubation with a FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:200, sc-2010; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at room temperature for 1 h. Mouse IgG2a (1:200, sc-2856; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) was used as the isotype control for Ki-67 antibody and FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:200, sc-2010; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) as a negative control to assess non-specific binding of the secondary antibody. MSCs were then stained with DAPI at room temperature for 3 min and imaged using an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometric Quantification of TCR, CD8, and pMHC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Site densities of TCR, CD8, and pMHC were measured by flow cytometry5 (link) using PE-conjugated antibodies: anti-mouse Vα2 TCR monoclonal antibody (mAb) (B20.1, BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA), anti-mouse CD4 (RM-45, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), anti-mouse CD8 (53–6.7, BD Pharmingen), anti-mouse OVA257–264 bound H2-Kb (25-D1.16, eBioscience), anti-mouse H2-Kb (AF6–88.5, BD Pharmingen), and β2 microglobulin (S19.8, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX). PE-conjugated rat IgG2a κ (eBioscience), mouse IgG2a (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and hamster IgG3 λ1 (BD Pharmingen) were used as isotype controls. Cells and beads were incubated with appropriate antibodies at 10 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS buffer (PBS without calcium and magnesium, 5 mM EDTA, 1% BSA, 25mM HEPES, 0.02% sodium azide) at 4 °C for 30 min; measured the fluorescent intensity by the BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA); and calibrated by the BD QuantiBRITE PE standard beads (BD Biosciences) to determine the site densities using the cell or bead surface area (154 μm2 for a thymocyte; 140 μm2 for a RBC; and 12.6 μm2 for a bead)5 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!