The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Factorfour capillary column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The FactorFour capillary column is a high-performance gas chromatography column designed for efficient separation and analysis of a wide range of sample components. It features a rugged fused silica construction and proprietary stationary phase coating for reliable and reproducible results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using factorfour capillary column

1

PHA Content Analysis by GC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PHA content was analyzed using gas chromatography according to the method described earlier (Huijberts et al., 1994). Approximately 10 mg of freeze‐dried cells was mixed with 1 mL chloroform, to which was added 1 mL of methanol solution (containing 15% (v/v) sulfuric acid and 0.4% (w/v) benzoic acid) before incubating the mixture at 100 °C for 3 h to convert the PHA monomers formed to their methyl esters. Subsequently, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, and 0.5 mL of distilled water was added and then shaken for 30 s. The chloroform layer was transferred to another tube and 2 µL sample volume was injected into the gas chromatography column (Varian, Factor Four Capillary Column, Varian, 15 m x 0.25 mm), with injection temperature set at 250 °C and detector temperature at 240 °C. The column temperature for the first 5 min was maintained at 60 °C and then increased at a rate of 3 °C/min to 120 °C. Standard PHB was used for calibration. All of the analysis was performed in triplicate. PHA content (wt% of cell dry weight) of the cells and PHA concentration (per liter culture broth, g/L) were determined as reported previously (Quillaguamán et al., 2007).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of DiTMP by GC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative analysis of the reaction component (DiTMP) was performed using gas chromatography (GC, Varian 430-GC, Varian, USA) equipped with FactorFour Capillary column, VF-1ms (Varian, 15M × 0.25mm) and a flame ionization detector. The initial column temperature was increased from 50 °C to 250 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min. The samples, diluted with acetonitrile, to a concentration of 0.01–0.5 mg/mL, were injected in a split injection mode of 10% at 275 °C. About 10 mg of samples was taken from the reactant during time course, and was dissolved at 10 mg/mL concentration in acetonitrile at room temperature for 20 min. After the solution was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 min, the resulting supernatant was injected to measure the remaining monomer to GC (Fig. S2). The residual amount and conversion rate of DTMPC in the reaction were calculated by using standard curves of DTMPC concentration. All the data were obtained from two independent experiments and were provided as the average of the replicates with error bars.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cellular Lipid Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular lipids were extracted twice with hexane/2-propanol (3:2). During the first extraction, β-sitosterol was added as an internal standard for quantification. Dried lipids were resuspended in hexane and separated on a Varian Factor Four capillary column, using a Varian 400 GC/MS/MS system (14). The protein concentration after solubilization with 0.5 M NaOH was determined by the BCA protein assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Analysis by GC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FAMEs were analyzed on a Varian-430 gas chromatograph (Varian, Lake Forest, CA, USA) equipped with a Varian FactorFour capillary column (VF-23 ms; 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness) and a flame-ionization detector. FAMEs were injected in splitless mode. The carrier gas was helium, set to a constant flow rate of 0.7 ml/min. The injector and detector ports were set at 250°C. FAMEs were eluted using a temperature program set initially at 50°C for 2 min, increased at 20°C/min to 170°C held at 170°C for 1 min, increased at 3°C/min to 212°C and held at 212°C for 5 min. Peaks were identified by retention times of authentic FAME standards of known composition (Nu-Chek-Prep, Elysian, MN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lipid Extraction and Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 96 h of treatment, cells were trypsinized, washed twice in PBS and resuspended in fatty acid free medium. Total lipids were extracted as described by Bligh and Dyer [27 (link)] using NaCl, methanol and choloform (Sigma-Alrich) in a 1:2:2 ratio. Thin-layer chromatography was used to separate lipid classes using silica G-plates (EMD Chemical, Gibbstown, NJ, USA) Total phospholipid fatty acids were collected into test tubes and a known amount of 17:0 standard (Avanti, Alabaster, AL, USA) was added. Fatty acids were converted to fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) by incubating for 1 h at 100 °C in hexane and boron trifluoride-methanol (Sigma-Aldrich). FAME were transferred to gas chromatography (GC) vials and samples were analyzed by GC-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) using a Varian-430 GC (Varian, Lake Forest, CA, USA) equipped with a Varian FactorFour capillary column (VF-23 ms; 30 m · 0.25 mm i.d. · 0.25 lm film thickness) and a FID. Samples were injected in splitless mode as previously described [28 (link)]. Fatty acids were identified by comparison to a reference standard consisting of GLC-68 and GLC-455 supplemented with 8:0, 10:0, and 12:0 methyl esters (Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN) and quantified by comparing the area of the peaks to the 17:0 peak. Results are presented as mole percentages of total fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!