The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using s6d microscope

1

Genetic Mosaic Cell Transplantation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mosaic embryos were obtained using erbb2 control or mutant Tg(myl7:mKateCAAX); Tg(myl7:Cypher-EGFP) and Tg(myl7:ras-GFP);Tg(myl7:Cypher-EGFP) double transgenic lines. Cells were removed from donor embryos and transplanted into the marginal zone of stage-matched host embryos. Embryos were visualized using a Leica S6D microscope. Cells were transplanted using borosilicate thin wall capillary glass tubing needles (Warner Instruments) and a CellTram vario (Eppendorf) apparatus that allowed for precise control of pressure transmission with oil. Host embryos with mKateCAAX-expressing cells were allowed to develop until 5 dpf. Donor embryos from in-crossing erbb2st61 heterozygotes were kept to determine genotype of donor cells as previously described38 (link). Embryos were mounted for imaging, as previously described17 (link), for observing compact myocardial wall and sarcomere measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phenotypic Analysis of P4 Dermal Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure cell proliferation, a standard growth curve assay was performed on P4 ventral dermal fibroblasts between passage 4–6 as described above. 30,000 cells were plated in duplicate into a 12 well plate, with cell number being assessed using Trypan blue (Invitrogen/Gibco Cat. No. 1520061) exclusion on the Cell Countess (Invitrogen Cat. No. C10281). Collective cell migration was assessed using a qualitative scratch assay (Liang et al., 2007 (link)). Briefly, a 200 μL pipet tip was used to scratch the monolayer and create a 400 μm gap. Images of cells were taken at time (T) 0, 15, and 22 h. Images were taken on Leica S6D microscope with MC120 HD camera with Leica software. Cell contraction was assessed using the Cell Contraction Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs Inc., CBA-201), following manufacturer instruction. Images of cells were taken with Olympus IX71 microscope with Olympus BX60 camera using Olympus DP controller software. All images were analyzed in Image J software (Schneider et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Skeletal Analysis in Postnatal Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were euthanized, skinned, and eviscerated on postnatal day 40. Overnight fixation in 70% ethanol was followed by 2 days in acetone. Animals were stained in a solution of 0.05% alizarin red, 0.015% Alcian blue, and 5% glacial acetic acid in 70% ethanol for 10–12 days, with clearing of extraskeletal tissues using a graded series of 2–0.5% KOH (31 (link)). Long bones (femur, tibia, humerus, radius, and ulna) were measured using Leica Application Suite software (v3.8.0) on images obtained using a Leica EC3 camera and a Leica S6-D microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ischemia-Reperfusion Retinal Injury Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The animals were anaesthetized intraperitoneally with Xylazine (50 mg/ml)/Ketamine (50 mg/ml). The I/R retinal injury was induced as described earlier [1 (link),2 (link),22 (link)]. Briefly, mice were fixed in a supine position and approximately 1.5 cm midline incision was made under a stereozoom microscope (Leica S6D microscope + EC3 Camera). The muscles were retracted and the right CCA was exposed. The bifurcation was traced and the ECA was ligated with a suture (Ethicon; 7.0). Upon ligation of ECA, bifurcation of internal carotid artery (ICA) was traced and PPA was ligated with the suture (Ethicon; 7.0). Ischemic condition was maintained for 2 h. After 2 h, the ligated sutures were removed and the blood circulation was allowed to reperfuse. After 7, 14, and 28 days of reperfusion, the animals were sacrificed, and the ipsilateral eyes were enucleated and stored for retina isolation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated Worm Tracking Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Automated worm tracking was performed essentially as previously described [30 (link)]. Briefly, 5–10 IJs from three replicate batches were placed on a chemotaxis plate and allowed to acclimate to room temperature for 1 hour. To measure average speed, IJ movement was recorded using an Olympus E-PM1 digital camera attached to a Leica S6 D microscope for 60 s. Recordings were analyzed using WormTracker and WormAnalyzer software (Miriam Goodman lab, Stanford University) [108 (link)]. Analysis was conducted as previously described [30 (link)], except that the following WormTracker settings were adjusted: sample rate = 15 frames/s; auto-thresholding correction factor = 0.20. The average speed of IJs that did not move during the assay period but were confirmed to be alive at the end of the assay was manually zeroed. We note that one Ste. carpocapsae IJ in the 25 °C to 15 °C temperature-swapped population crawled at a speed that was approximately 10 times faster than that of the other IJs tested, suggesting it was a “sprinter” [109 (link)]. Sprinters, which comprise less than 5 % of the IJ population, disperse farther than other IJs and are thought to facilitate long-range population dispersal in the absence of a host [109 (link)]. This IJ was not included in our population analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Automated Tracking of Nematode Locomotion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Automated tracking was performed as described [22 (link)]. Briefly, recordings of iL3 movement were obtained with an Olympus E-PM1 digital camera attached to a Leica S6 D microscope. To quantify movement, 3–5 iL3s were placed in the center of a chemotaxis plate in a 5 μL drop of dH2O. Once the drop dried, the iL3s were allowed to acclimate to the plate for 10 min. 20-s recordings were then obtained from each iL3, ensuring that each iL3 was only recorded once. Worm movement was quantified using WormTracker and WormAnalyzer software (Miriam Goodman lab, Stanford University) [21 (link)]. The following WormTracker settings were used: minimum single worm area = 20 pixels; maximum size change by worm between successive frames = 250 pixels; shortest valid track = 30 frames; auto-thresholding correction factor = 0.001. F2 or F3 wild-type (paralyzed) or unc (twitching) iL3s were recovered from 1% nicotine treatment overnight on chemotaxis plates and tested for crawling behavior the next day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Worm Crawling Speed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Automated tracking was performed as described [18 (link)]. For each recording session, 10–15 iL3s were placed on a chemotaxis plate and allowed to acclimate for 10 minutes. iL3 movement was then captured for 20 seconds using an Olympus E-PM1 digital camera attached to a Leica S6 D microscope. WormTracker and WormAnalyzer [35 (link)] were used to quantify crawling speed. WormTracker and WormAnalyzer settings were previously described [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Dynamic Light Scattering of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dynamic light-scattering (DLS) measurements were performed using a NaBiTec GmbH setup comprising a SpectroSize 302 (Molecular Dimensions) in combination with an S6D microscope (Leica). The purified protein sample was concentrated to 10 mg/mL as described earlier was illuminated in a 2 μl hanging drop using a 24-well crystallization plate (VDX Greased Plate, Hampton Research) covered with siliconized-glass circular cover slides (22 mm; Hampton Research). The well itself was filled with 400 μl SEC running buffer. Prior to the measurement, the protein solution was centrifuged at 18000 ×g, 30 min, 4°C to remove possible dust and other suspended particles. All measurements were done at 20°C. Ten consecutive measurements, each with an integration time of 20 s, were averaged. Hydrodynamic size of the particles was estimated with the instrument software using the following parameters: refractive index 1.33, viscosity 1.006, shape factor 1.0 and hydrated shell 0.2 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Dynamic Light Scattering of Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dynamic light-scattering (DLS) measurements were performed using a NaBiTec GmbH setup comprising a SpectroSize 302 (Molecular Dimensions) in combination with an S6D microscope (Leica). The purified protein sample (concentrated to 8 mg ml−1 as described above) was illuminated in a 3 µl hanging drop using a 24-well crystallization plate (VDX Greased Plate, Hampton Research) covered with siliconized-glass circular cover slides (22 mm; Hampton Research). The well itself was filled with 600 µl SEC running buffer. Prior to the measurement, the protein solution was centrifuged (1000g, 30 min, 4°C) to remove possible dust particles. During the measurement, the temperature was set to 20°C. Ten consecutive measurements, each with an integration time of 20 s, were averaged. An estimate of the hydrodynamic size was obtained with the instrument software using the following parameters: refractive index 1.33, viscosity 1.006, shape factor 1.0, hydrated shell 0.2 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Crystalline Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Thermo Quattro S field-emission
environmental
scanning electron microscope (FE-ESEM) was utilized to obtain the
SEM images. Optical images of crystals were captured on a Leica S6D
microscope with a Leica EC4 digital camera attachment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!