The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

74 protocols using sureselect target enrichment system

1

Tethered Conformation Capture of Chromatin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tethered conformation capture (TCC), which is a variation of Hi-C, was performed to detect chromatin interactions. A TCC library was prepared in accordance with the method reported by Kalhor et al. with minor modifications [35 (link)]. The captured DNA fragments corresponding to the target regions were obtained from the TCC library using the SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies). The library was subjected to paired-end sequencing on the Genome Analyzer IIx or MiSeq (Illumina) platform. For further details, see Additional file 2: Supplementary Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whole-Exome Sequencing of Genetically Obese Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples of paired tumor and adjacent normal tissues from genetically obese mice and control lean mice were subjected to whole-exome sequencing. Exome capture was performed using the SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Captured libraries were sequenced by HiSeq2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). An average of 177x sequencing depth of target regions was obtained for each sample (Supplementary Table 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparison of EGFR Mutations in CTCs and Primary Tumor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We recovered single CTC through white blood cell (WBC) depletion on the LCM device and analyzed EGFR mutations in the isolated CTCs in comparison with its primary tumor. Targeted sequencing technology was used to find out the similarity of EGFR mutations in CTCs and primary tissues. KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA) and the SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used following the instructions to prepare sequencing libraries for targeted sequencing analysis. Then, targeted sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the results were analyzed by the Genomics Workbench software (Agilent Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Exome Sequencing and Variant Annotation Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each sample, 3 μg of genomic DNA was sonicated into fragments, and used to construct a paired-end sequencing library with the Agilent SureSelect Target Enrichment System. Exome capture was performed with the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon kit. Each sample was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument. The sequenced reads were aligned to the human genome reference (UCSC hg 19 version) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA). Reads qualities were recalibrated using Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK). Picard 1.14 was used to flag duplicate reads. GATK IndelRealigner was used to realign reads around insertion/deletion sites. The Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (InDels) were generated with GATK Unified Genotyper and in parallel with the SAMtools pipeline. The called SNVs and Indels were annotated with ANNOVAR32 (link)33 (link)34 (link)35 (link)36 (link)37 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Profiling of Monogenic Hypertension

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants provided venous blood samples for genetic testing. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) by standard protocols. Next-generation sequencing of 41 monogenic hypertension-related genes was performed for the proband (Supplementary Table 1). All coding exons were enriched using custom-made SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Captured DNA library were sequenced on Illumina Hiseq X Ten according to standard protocol for paired-end 150bp reads. Paired-end reads were aligned to the reference genome (hg19) using the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner and duplicated reads were marked by Picard.12 (link) SNVs and indels were detected by SAMtools, and Annovar13 (link) was used for annotation. A mutation in γ-ENaC was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using gene-specific primer pairs: SCNN1G: (GenBank accession number NM_001039): forward primer: 5′-CTTGGGAATCAGGGTTCCTGTG-3′, reverse primer: 5′-AAGCAGGCTTTTTGGTCAGAGT-3′.14 (link) The PCR products were sequenced bidirectionally using an ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA Library Construction for Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 100 ng (cell lines and PDX samples) or 200 ng (FFPE samples) of extracted genomic DNA (gDNA) was used as template for library construction and prepared as previously described [22 (link)]. Briefly, gDNA was fragmented to 250 base pairs using Covaris Ultrasonication (LE220 Focused-ultrasonicator, Covaris, Woburn, MA), and fragmented DNA was purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Inc. Indianapolis, IN). Size-selected DNA was then ligated to sequencing adaptors using sample-specific indices (Illumina TruSeq HT, IDT-synthesized TS-96, or IDT dual-matched indices with UMIs), libraries were constructed using Kapa HTP (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA) and quantified using qPCR (Kapa Biosystems). The SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was used to perform hybrid capture using either the SureSelect Human All Exon V5 bait set for whole exome enrichment, or smaller, custom-designed bait sets. For the multiplexing, index-hopping experiments, the libraries were prepared using the IDT dual-matched indexed adapters with the Kapa Hyper Prep kit (Kapa Biosystems), and the xGen AML Cancer Panel was used for capture (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA). Sequencing platforms used (Illumina MiSeq, HiSeq 2500, HiSeq 3000/4000, or NextSeq) are listed along with the experiments (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole Blood DNA Extraction and Targeted Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient DNA was isolated from whole blood (3 mL) using the QIA amp DNA blood kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Three micrograms of high-molecular-weight DNA was sheared using a Covarias ultrasonicator and the genomic DNA library was prepared with an Agilent SureSelect Target Enrichment System. Following enrichment with Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V7, sequencing was performed on an IlluminaHiSeq 2500 System (Illumina, San Diego, USA). Data interpretation and variant calling were performed on SOPHiA DDM® version 5.4.2 (Sophia Genetics, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exome Sequencing Workflow Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The exome sequencing was performed by two laboratories. Of all reports, 95 reports were analysed by Genome Diagnostics Nijmegen (Nijmegen, Netherlands), and nine reports were analysed by Ambry Genetics (Aliso Viejo, CA).
For the WES performed at Genome Diagnostics Nijmegen, the targets were enriched using Agilent SureSelectXT (Agilent Technologies), and the whole-exome sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq platform (BGI, Copenhagen, Denmark), followed by data processing using BWA (read alignment) and GATK (variant calling). The variants were annotated using the external laboratory’s in-house-developed pipeline. The variants were prioritised using an in-house-designed ‘variant interface’ and manual curation.13 (link) For the WES performed at Ambry Genetics, the samples were prepared using a SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies) or SeqCap EZ VCRome 2.0 (Roche NimbleGen) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 or 2500. The initial data processing, base calling, alignments and variant calls were performed using various bioinformatics tools at Ambry Genetics. The variant calls were annotated using the Ambry Variant Analyzer tool (AVA)26 (link) and filtered using laboratory-devised strategies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Exome Sequencing Variant Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exome library preparation, sequencing, and bioinformatics were performed as previously described.15 (link) Briefly, samples were prepared using either the SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), SeqCap EZ VCRome 2.0 (Roche NimbleGen, Massion, WI),16 (link) or the IDT xGen Exome Research Panel V1.0 (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) and sequenced using paired-end, 100- or 150-cycle chemistry on the Illumina HiSeq or NextSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Stepwise filtering included the removal of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms, intergenic and 3′/5′ untranslated region variants, intronic variants outside ±2, and synonymous variants (other than potential splice-related synonymous changes at the first and last positions of exons). However, alterations classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic based on Ambry's variant classification schema as well as alterations with a Human Gene Mutation Database identifier were protected from the aforementioned filtering. Identified candidate alterations were confirmed using automated fluorescence dideoxy sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
830 tumor and 788 matched normal tissues (mainly blood) from 788 cancer patients referred to the Molecular Tumor Board of the University Clinics Tübingen (Bitzer et al., 2020 (link)) were analyzed for therapeutically relevant molecular alterations including MEIs in coding regions, introns or the close vicinity of cancer driver genes. Samples were sequenced between 2017 and 2020 with different versions of a custom targeted cancer gene panel. The different versions were based on the Agilent SureSelect Target Enrichment System and comprised between 337 genes (oldest version) and 708 genes (most recent version). Matched tumor and normal sample pairs were sequenced to an average coverage of 500× and 200×, respectively. Normal tissues were analyzed for germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes, while tumor tissues were used for the analysis of somatic variants. The complete procedure has been described by Hilke et al. (2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!