The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using su 8 2000

1

Evaluating Mechanical Stability of Polymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the evaluation of mechanical stability, a nanoindentation test was conducted using iMicro equipment (KLA). To perform the nano-indentation test, first, epoxy siloxane polymer was spin-coated onto a Si wafer to a thickness of 50 μm. For comparison, 50-μm-thick SU-8 (SU-8 2000, MicroChem) coated on a Si wafer was used. The maximum testing load was 50 mN, and the test was conducted more than 16 times for each sample to ensure accuracy. Representative data from each sample are displayed in the fig. S3. After the test, the surfaces of the epoxy siloxane polymer, SU-8, and the Si wafer itself were specifically inspected using a 3D optical-confocal microscope (VK-X1050, Keyence) and an SEM (SU-5000, Hitachi) to estimate the depth profile.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Culture Media Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), gelatine, and various other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). SU-8 2000 was purchased from MicroChem (Newton, MA, USA). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Grand Island, NE, USA), penicillin G-streptomycin sulphate (Life Technologies Corporation, Chicago, IL USA), and foetal bovine serum (FBS; Hangzhou Sijiqing Biological Engineering Materials Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) were used as the cell culture medium. Trypsin-EDTA (0.25% trypsin-EDTA) was obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fabrication of Multilayer SU-8 Microfluidic Molds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The master mold was microfabricated using SU-8 2075 photoresist (MicroChem, Newton, MA) on a 4-inch Si wafer (ID: 1116, University Wafer, Boston, MA). This mold consisted of 3 layers (see Fig. 1b). The first layer was created by spin-coating a 110 µm thick layer of photoresist onto the wafer, followed by a soft-bake process. The wafer was aligned to the photomask and UV exposed for 18 s at 17 mW/cm2. The photoresist layer was then post-exposure baked to polymerize the exposed pattern. The second and third layers of the device were created via a similar process. The second layer was 300 µm thick using an exposure time of 28 s, while the third layer was 110 µm thick with 34 s exposure time. Each subsequent exposure during the UV lithography process crosslinks all polymer in the lower layers, creating solid structures down to the silicon wafer substrate. After the final post-exposure bake, SU-8 developer solution (MicroChem) with sonication was used to dissolve unexposed photoresist. The SU-8 mold surfaces were exposed to trichloro(methyl)silane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) vapor to later aid the release of PDMS from the mold. All times and temperatures used for soft-bake and post-exposure bake were according to the MicroChem SU-8 2000 processing guidelines for the cumulative thickness (see Table S1 in the ESM for specific used temperatures and times).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fabrication of Microfluidic Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microfluidic chips were designed
using AutoCAD (Autodesk) and printed out on a high-resolution film
photomask (Micro Lithography Services). The mask designs are published
on dropbase (https://openwetware.org/wiki/Dropbase:_Double-emulsion-02). The master molds of microfluidic devices were fabricated following
standard hard lithography protocols. First, 15-μm-high microfluidic
structures were patterned on 3 in. silicon wafers (Microchemicals)
using high-resolution film masks and SU-8 2015 photoresist (Kayaku
Advanced Materials) according to the guidelines of the manufacturer
(SU-8 2000, Micro Chem). A MJB4 mask aligner (SÜSS MicroTec)
was used to UV expose all of the SU-8 spin-coated wafers. The thickness
of the structures (corresponding to the depth of channels in the final
microfluidic devices) was confirmed by measurement with a Dektat stylus
profilometer (Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microfluidic Biofilm Growth and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microfluidic channels (Figure 1) were fabricated using standard soft lithography.58 (link) A high resolution transparency mask (CAD/ART Services Inc) was used to fabricate SU-8 (Su-8 2000, Microchem) molds on silicon wafers. The mask was printed emulsion side down and placed directly on the Su-8. The Su-8 was exposed with a UV flood exposure (Dymax, 2000-EC series) using a 380nm filter. Channels were fabricated by pouring polydimethylsiloxane (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) over the molds, followed by degassing and crosslinking in a vacuum chamber overnight. The channels were removed from the mold and access ports were punched with a 0.75mm hole punch. The channel bottoms, made by spinning polydimethylsiloxane onto a glass slide, were bonded to channels using air plasma (Plasma Cleaner, Harrick Plasma), left overnight in an 80°C oven, and stored at 20°C until use.
To inoculate the channels, 1μL of diluted bacterial culture was added to 50μL of biofilm growth medium; 25μL of this resulting suspension was injected into the channels using a syringe. After inoculation, the inlets and outlets were sealed to prevent evaporation. These channels were kept inside the incubator at 37°C in static conditions to allow for biofilm growth. The biofilms were examined at 24 hour & 48 hour after the microchannels were inoculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fabrication of PDMS Microfluidic Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A two-step photolithographic process was used to fabricate the master used for casting PDMS devices. A 500-nm-thick negative photoresist (SU-8 2000.5, MicroChem) was spin-coated onto a silicon wafer. This, in turn, was soft-baked for 2 min at 95°C. The chrome mask in Fig. 1B was then placed onto the wafer, exposed under ultraviolet (UV) light to induce polymerization, and then post-baked at 95°C for 3 min. A second 25-μm-thick layer (SU-8 3025, MicroChem) was then spin-coated onto the wafer and soft-baked for 5 min 95°C. The second mask (shown in Fig. 1C) was aligned with respect to the patterns formed from the first mask. This was, in turn, exposed to UV light and post-baked for 15 min at 95°C. Last, to remove uncross-linked photoresist, the master was developed in propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (Sigma-Aldrich).
A 10:1 ratio of elastomer PDMS to curing agent (SYLGARD 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI) was used to fabricate microfluidic devices. The mixture was cured for 3 hours at 65°C. The hardened PDMS was cut and peeled off the master, while holes of 0.75 mm were punched on the PDMS. This was then bonded onto a glass slide by treating with a plasma bonder (Diener Electronic, Ebhausen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scalable Transfer Printing of PI Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PI encapsulated devices (HBT, Schottky diode, inductor and capacitor, and digital electronics) on temporary Si substrates were boiled in acetone at 200 °C for 2 h to remove the underlying sacrificial layer (PMMA). A large PDMS elastomer stamp was used to transfer print the finished devices onto the CNF substrate with a thin layer of polymer (SU8 2000.5, Microchem, 500 nm) as the adhesive layer to ensure good bonding between the CNF substrate and the transferred devices.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Biophotonic Sensing Cells for Dengue Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For this experimental work we used as photonic transducer a Biophotonic Sensing Cell (BICELL) [8 (link)–10 (link)] based on Fabry-Perot interferometers of a square size of 1 cm2 and on SU8 polymeric thin film that exhibits a reliable optical label-free biosensing capability. For the BICELL fabrication we use SU8 2000.5 (MicroChem Corp., Newton, MA, USA) diluted 1:10 in cyclopentanone; this SU8 was deposited by spinning and then soft-baked at 70 °C for 1 min. An exposure to UV light process was then carried out, followed by a post-bake step at 70 °C for 5 min to give a stable thin film. Finally, an acid catalysis step was carried out in order to increase the hydrophilicity of the film. The label-free optical biosensing is carried out by monitoring the changes in the optical mode response provoked by the occurence of both the immobilization of the anti-dengue bioreceptors and the recognition of dengue virus antigen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fabrication of Plasmonic Au Nanoparticles in Polymer Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gold(III) chloride trihydrate (≥99.9% trace metals basis)/Au salt with the chemical formula HAuCl 4 .3H 2 O was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. SU-8 2000.5 (epoxy-based negative photoresist) was purchased from MicroChem Corporation.
Au NPs were fabricated inside a polymer film deposited on a glass substrate following the process shown in Figure 1. The general procedure follows three steps, all of them in air environment conditions: (i) Au salt was mixed with SU-8 2000.5 at different weight ratios (wt.%) by stirring for 20 minutes for complete dissolution. (ii) The nanocomposite metal/resist solution was then deposited on a glass substrate by spin-coating at 500 rpm for 5 s and then at 2000 rpm for 30 s. (iii) After that, thermal annealing treatment was carried out at different temperatures, between room temperature and 240 ° C (accuracy ±1 ° C), using a standard hot plate.
The nanocomposite film thickness was measured using a profilometer in a clean room, and ranged from 500 to 1000 nm. The plasmonic color can be observed by eye and by using a standard camera combined with an optical microscope. The plasmonic properties of the Au NPs in SU-8 resist were characterized by an ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectrometer. To evaluate Au NPs sizes, shapes, and distributions, the nanocomposite was dropped on a carbon-coated Cu grid and examined by a transmission electron microscope (TEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fabrication of Al-coated SU-8 Nanopillars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, a negative resist SU-8 2000.5 (Microchem Corp.) was spun at 3000 rpm on a 100 nm thick Al film, which was previously deposited on a Si substrate, and soft-baked at 110 °C for 1 min on a hot plate. Next, a 600 nm period square lattice of circular solid nanodots was written in the resist film by electron beam lithography (EBL) at 50 kV and 50 pA in a Crestec CABL-9000C high-resolution EBL system [9 ]. After electron beam exposure, the samples were post-baked at 80 °C for 3 min to crosslink the SU-8 irradiated regions. Next, the part of the resist that was not crosslinked was removed by rinsing the samples in MicroChem SU-8 developer at −15 °C for 7 s and then gently dried with nitrogen flow. This resulted in ≈270 nm diameter and ≈320 nm tall SU-8 nanopillars, as shown in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph of Figure 1a. Then, a thin layer of Al was electron-beam evaporated (deposition rate = 1 nm/s) on the SU-8 nanopillar array (Figure 1b). The measured thickness of the deposited Al film on a flat substrate was 40 nm. Finally, the sample was exposed to an oxygen plasma (RF power = 50 W, flow rate = 15 sccm) for 30 min (Figure 1c).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!