The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using arecoline

1

Synergistic Effects of NNK and Arecoline in HNSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NNK was obtained from ChemSyn Laboratories (Lenexa, KS). Arecoline was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and dissolved in DMSO to a concentration of 100 mM. Parental SCC25 and FaDu cells were plated at a density of 5 × 104 live cells/10-cm dish and treated with Arecoline at a final concentration of 0, 10, 50, 100, or 150 nM for 3 months. Then the cells were harvested and cultured with NNK (50 nM) and/or Arecoline (130 nM), with the medium being changed every other day. Arecoline (130 nM) and NNK (50 nM) were tested and found to be the most optimal dose for further analysis. Three experimental groups were prepared to examine the effects of NNK and Arecoline, alone or in combination. The first and second groups of HNSCC cells were treated with NNK and Arecoline separately, and the third group was treated with both NNK and Arecoline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Arecoline Treatment of Oral Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Smulow–Glickman (S-G) human gingival epithelial and FaDu OSCC cell lines were used in this study. The cultivation of these cells was following the protocols previously used.
Arecoline was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and was dissolved in ddH2O as a stock solution of 100 mM. Just before use, Arecoline was further diluted in culture medium to appropriate final concentrations [41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fibroblast Morphology and Arecoline/Collagenase Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The third passage was taken into consideration for the morphological assessment of the fibroblasts and the effects of arecoline (Sigma-Aldrich) and collagenase (HiMedia) on a concentration in a dose-dependent manner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dulbecco’s modified Eagles’ medium (DMEM), penicillin/streptomycin, trypsin/EDTA, fetal bovine serum (FBS), KGM-SFM medium, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were from Gibco (Life Technologies, USA). Arecoline, melatonin and MTT were from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA). ELISA kits for MMP-9 were from PeproTech (PeproTech, Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Catalase, SB431542, 5Z-7-Oxozeaenol, PD153035, AG490, U0126, LY294002, and aspirin were purchased from Tocris. Phospho-TAK1 (p-TAK1) antibody was from Abcam (ab79583). Antibodies for TGF-β1, and GAPDH were from Santa Cruz. P-Smad2 antibody was from Cell Signaling Technology. PBL extract and ANE were prepared as before [8 (link), 12 (link), 13 (link), 21 (link)]. HC was synthesized as previously [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mouse Oral Mucosa Pathogenesis Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty-four pathogen-free female mice (BALB/c, six weeks old) were purchased from the State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University. After two weeks of normal feeding in the animal laboratory of the West China Hospital of Stomatology, the mice were equally divided into four groups. The three groups of mice were treated with saline (PBS, 1 mg/ml), arecoline (ARE, Sigma-Aldrich, 31593, 1 mg/ml), and bleomycin (BLE, 1 mg/ml). Every 2 days, we used a 29-gauge insulin syringe (Ultra-Fine, BD) to administer 50 μl of drug treatment to the bilateral buccal mucosa of the mouse for 14 weeks. After the mice were sacrificed, the obtained buccal mucosa of the oral cavity was fixed (4% paraformaldehyde), dehydrated, and embedded for subsequent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Arecoline and Bovine Collagen Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arecoline and collagen solution from bovine skin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Areca Quid Chewers' Oral Fibrosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arecoline and collagen solution from bovine skin were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). TGFβ type I receptor inhibitor, SB431542, was purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). Human TGFβ1 was obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). All methods applied in this study were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines from the Institutional Review Board of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and informed written consent was obtained from each individual prior to commencing the study. Tissue specimens from areca quid chewers were collected from Department of Dentistry, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. Biopsy specimens were taken from the histologically normal oral mucosa and fibrotic mucosa at the time of surgical third molar extraction. Fibroblast cultures were grown and maintained by using the explant method as described previously.28 Cell cultures between the third and eighth passages were used in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cytotoxicity and Proliferation of Arecoline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine cytotoxicity of arecoline, 4 x 104 cells of ORL-48(T) or ORL-136(T) cells were seeded into each well of 96-well tissue culture plates, and maintained in complete medium for 24 hours. The cells were treated with arecoline (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1,200 μg/ml in triplicate for 24 hours. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay.
To determine the effect of arecoline on cell proliferation, 5 x 103 cells of ORL-48(T) and ORL-136(T) cells in serum-starved DMEM/F12 medium were seeded into each well of 96-well tissue culture plates for 24 hours. The cells were treated with arecoline at 0, 0.025, 0.25, 2.5 and 25 μg/ml in serum-starved DMEM/F12 medium in triplicate for a further 24 hours. Cell proliferation was determined by the MTT assay.
By MTT assay, 10 μl MTT (5 mg/ml) was added to each well. After 4 hours, the medium was removed and the water-insoluble purple formazan particles were dissolved in 100 μl DMSO solution. The absorbance was read at 570 nm with a Microplate Reader (TECAN, Salzburg, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Arecoline-Induced Myofibroblast Transdifferentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arecoline, SB431542 (a specific inhibitor of the TGF-β type I receptor), and collagen solution from bovine skin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Arecoline stimulation was applied for the induction of myofibroblast transdifferentiation [2 (link)] and a collagen solution was used for collagen gel contraction analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Arecoline and Resveratrol Effects on Oral Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arecoline, resveratrol and collagen solution from bovine skin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All procedures were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines from the Institutional Review Board of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and informed written consent was granted from each individual prior to commencing the study. As previously indicated, primary cultures of BMFs were grown, and the third and eighth passages were employed in the OSF investigation.35 BMFs were treated with 20 μg/mL Arecoline for 24 h and were furtherly treated with varied doses of resveratrol for 48 h for functional study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!