The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Image and signal processing toolboxes

Manufactured by MathWorks
Sourced in United States

The Image and Signal Processing Toolboxes in MATLAB provide a comprehensive set of algorithms and tools for the analysis and processing of image and signal data. These toolboxes offer functions for tasks such as filtering, transformation, feature extraction, and visualization, enabling users to develop and test image and signal processing applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

2 protocols using image and signal processing toolboxes

1

Voltage Imaging Signal Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging data were analyzed using MATLAB (R2014b) with the Image and Signal Processing Toolboxes (Mathworks Inc, USA). The voltage imaging signal was calculated as the ratio of mKate2 (FRET acceptor) to mCitrine (FRET donor) fluorescence, taken after equalization of heartbeat-related fluorescence modulation (Akemann et al., 2012 (link)). Notably this equalization procedure has been to shown to effectively discount vascular artifacts such as heart-beat oscillation and slow (<1 Hz) fluctuation due to hemodynamics in anesthetized (Akemann et al., 2012 (link)) and awake (Carandini et al., 2015 (link)) conditions. The resulting ratiometric sequences of voltage maps were then smoothed spatially (2D gaussian, σ = 49.5 μm) and temporally (Chebyshev Type II band-path filtering 0.5–9 Hz, function imfilter, MATLAB, Mathworks Inc, USA). We excluded the first 10 s of each sequence to remove any effects of sensory stimulation (e.g., shutter noise and excitation light onset) related to the initiation of imaging sequence acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In Vivo Imaging of Neuronal Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were baseline normalized on a pixel-wise level, i.e., each pixel's baseline is the average over its values, for each 60s image sequence. Each 60s dataset was temporally smoothed using a sliding window to average pixel activity across 4 consecutive time points and then spatially smoothed using an 8 × 8 pixel averaging filter. Data were then high-pass filtered at 0.5 Hz in order to reduce the effect of slow trends in the baseline signal that may cause artificial (i.e., non-neural) correlations (Akemann et al. 2012 (link)). The first 10s of each image sequence were discarded to remove possible contribution from environmental cues present at the start of each imaging sequence (e.g., shutter noise and excitation light). Subsequent analyses were constrained to pixels within masks, drawn by hand for each mouse, which defined the extents of the bone window. We refined these masks by excluding regions with poor signal-to-noise ratios, defined as those pixels in which the protein expression (estimated as time-averaged absolute fluorescence intensity) was less than 50% of the maximum level across the field of view for each mouse. Imaging data were analyzed with Matlab using the Image and Signal Processing Toolboxes (Mathworks) and ImagePro 6.2 image processing software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!