SPSS ver. 12.0J was used for data input and statistical calculations (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences in age, BMI, degenerative score, SMI, and muscle strength results between men and women were assessed by the Mann–Whitney U test, and differences in exercise habits and the prevalence of smoking were analyzed by the Chi-square test. Correlations between the degenerative score and age, SMI, or muscle strength were analyzed by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were conducted using the degenerative score as the dependent variable. The independent variables used were age, BMI, and a muscle-strength parameter, for each gender. For all analyses, a P value < .05 was considered significant.
Spss ver 12.0j
Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States
SPSS version 12.0J is a software application designed for statistical analysis. It provides tools for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization. The software is capable of handling a wide range of data types and supports various statistical techniques, including regression, correlation, and hypothesis testing.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
7 protocols using spss ver 12.0j
1
Muscle Degeneration and Age
2
Trunk Sarcopenia Prevalence Across Ages
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The reference interval for trunk muscle torque was estimated based on the mean and standard deviation values for healthy young adults aged 18–39 years (81 males and 105 females) and calculated by mean ± (2 × standard deviation) according to the general definition of sarcopenia [27 (link),28 (link)]. Trunk sarcopenia was defined as a lower muscle torque than the lower limit of the reference interval. The prevalence of trunk sarcopenia was calculated among age groups: 40–49 (48 males and 73 females), 50–59 (49 males and 105 females), 60–69 (86 males and 132 females), 70–79 (46 males and 69 females), and 80 and older (80+) (7 males and 15 females)) in males and females. The age-related reduction was described as the torque percentage compared with the healthy young adult reference value. The values of trunk muscle torque among age groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test. Data input and calculation were performed with SPSS ver. 12.0J (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Data input and calculations were performed with SPSS ver. 12.0 J (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All experiments were performed at least three times. Values are reported as means ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were analyzed using unpaired t-test. P value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4
Comparison of Atypical Femoral Fractures
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Data input and calculation were performed with the SPSS ver.12.0 J (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The comparison of age, height, body weight, BMI, follow-up period, and neck-shaft angle between the M group and C group was performed using the Student’s t test for parametric data and Mann–Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Correlations of treatment duration of antiresorptive drugs and beaking or AFF were investigated with Spearman’s correlation. In all analyses, P values <0.05 were considered significant.
5
Cervical Spine Alignment and Symptoms
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Data input and calculations were performed using SPSS ver.12.0J (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons of the characteristics, the sagittal alignment of C2–C7, and the degenerative index between males and females was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. The prevalence rate of neck pain or stiff shoulder was analyzed using a χ2 test. The relationships between the sagittal alignment of C2–C7 or the degenerative index and age, or the VAS for neck pain or stiff shoulder in males and females were analyzed by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and partial correlation analysis was performed to adjust the data for age. The VAS results for neck pain and stiff shoulder among the straight, lordotic, and kyphotic groups were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and the Bonferroni method after adjusting for age in females. In all analyses, P values <0.05 were considered significant.
6
Comparative Assessment of Patient Evaluation
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The number of patient assessment statements completed by the RPs and support team was counted for each category of consciousness, circulation, and respiration. A chi-square test was performed to compare the number of assessment counts between the RPs and the support team. Significance was set at <5%. SPSS ver. 12.0 J was used as the statistical analysis software.
7
Spinal Cord Compression Evaluation Protocol
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
SPSS ver.12.0J (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data input and statistical calculations. We compared the Groups A and B using the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative data and the chi-squared test for qualitative data. We compared the cases with and without radiculopathy using the Mann-Whitney U test for the JOA recovery rate. We used the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to analyze correlations between the PSSC, including the amount of shift and the level of greatest shift (C5 or C6), and the PBG and AOL in both groups. Values were expressed as mean ± S.D. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!