The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultimate 3000 rslcnano liquid chromatography system

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano is a liquid chromatography system designed for the separation and analysis of complex samples, with a focus on nano-scale separations. It provides high-performance liquid chromatography capabilities for a wide range of applications, including proteomics, metabolomics, and other analytical techniques that require precise separation and detection of small-volume samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using ultimate 3000 rslcnano liquid chromatography system

1

IgG Glycopeptide Analysis by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The IgG glycopeptide samples were analysed using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS), in a setup described previously41 (link). An amount of 2.5 µL of the samples was injected in an Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano liquid chromatography system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA). The samples were first washed on an Acclaim PepMap100 C18 trap column (5 mm × 300 µm i.d., Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA), and subsequently separated on an Ascentis Express C18 nanoLC column (50 mm × 75 µm i.d., 2.7 µm HALO fused core particles; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) with a flow rate of 0.9 µL/min. The following linear gradient was used, with solvent A consisting of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and B of 95% acetonitrile (ACN): t = 0, 3% solvent B; t = 2, 6%; t = 4.5, 18%; t = 5, 30%; t = 7, 30%; t = 8, 0%; t = 11, 0%.
Via a sheath-flow electrospray (ESI) interface (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), the LC was coupled to a Maxis Impact quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF)-MS system (micrOTOF-Q; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). A sheath-flow consisting of 50% isopropanol, 20% propionic acid (Merck) and 30% MilliQ-purified water was applied at 2 µL/min, and nitrogen gas was applied at 4 L/min. MS1 spectra were acquired with a frequency of 0.5 Hz and within an m/z range of 600-2000. An IgG standard and two blank injections were run in between every 12 runs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel purified samples were analyzed using an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography system (Dionex) connected an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron). Additional details regarding the sample processing are provided in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Characterization via MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel bands were trypsinized overnight following reduction and alkylation with DTT and iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich). Following solid-phase extraction cleanup with Oasis HLB plates (Waters), the resulting samples were analyzed by LC/MS/MS using an Orbitrap Elite or Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography system (Dionex). Peptides were eluted with a gradient 0%–28% buffer B (80% [v/v] ACN, 10% [v/v] trifluoroethanol, and 0.08% formic acid in water) over 60 min.
Raw MS data files were converted to a peak list format and analyzed using the central proteomics facilities pipeline (CPFP), version 2.0.3 (Trudgian et al. 2010 (link); Trudgian and Mirzaei 2012 (link)). Peptide identification was performed using the X!Tandem (Craig and Beavis 2004 (link)) and open MS search algorithm (OMSSA) (Geer et al. 2004 (link)) search engines against the human protein database from Uniprot, with common contaminants and reversed decoy sequences appended (Elias and Gygi 2007 (link)). The detailed proteomics method is provided in the Supplemental Material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Phosphorylated Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide and purified PKR protein mixture was diluted to 1 ug/uL in 2% acetonitrile (ACN), 0.1% formic acid, and analyzed by LC/MS/MS, using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography system (Dionex). Samples were injected onto a 75 μm i.d., 50-cm long EasySpray column (Thermo), and eluted with a gradient from 1%–28% buffer B over 60 min. Buffer A contained 2% (v/v) ACN and 0.1% formic acid in water, and buffer B contained 80% (v/v) ACN, 10% (v/v) trifluoroethanol, and 0.1% formic acid in water. The mass spectrometer operated in positive ion mode with a source voltage of 2.2 kV and an ion transfer tube temperature of 275°C. MS scans were acquired at 120,000 resolution in the Orbitrap and up to 10 MS/MS spectra were obtained in the ion trap for each full spectrum acquired using higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) for ions with charges 2–7. Phosphorylated peptides of interest were observed by generating an extracted ion chromatogram corresponding to a 0.01 Da window around the theoretical m/z of the +3 charged monoisotopic mass of the singly phosphorylated peptide of interest.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histone H2B Immunoprecipitation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB-231 cells expressing FLAG-tagged wild-type or mutant histone H2B were seeded at ~5×106 cells per 15 cm diameter plate and cultured as described above. Nucleosome immunoprecipitation was performed as described above. The immunoprecipitated material was electrophoresed on a precast SDS-PAGE gel and the regions containing histone proteins were excised from the gel. The proteins were digested with trypsin and processed for mass spectrometry as described previously (22 (link)). The resulting peptides were injected onto an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography system (Dionex). The samples were eluted with a gradient from 1–28% Buffer B over 90 minutes. Buffer A contained 2% (v/v) ACN and 0.1% formic acid in water, and Buffer B contained 80% (v/v) ACN, 10% (v/v) trifluoroethanol, and 0.1% formic acid in water. MS scans were acquired at a 120,000 resolution in the Orbitrap and up to 10 MS/MS spectra were obtained in the ion trap for each full spectrum acquired using higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) for ions with charges 2–7. Raw MS data files were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer v2.2 (Thermo), with peptide identification performed using Sequest HT searching against the Homo sapiens database from UniProt.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identification of ERG-Interacting Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ERG-V5 was ectopically expressed in HEK293T cells, immunoprecipitated with a V5 antibody, and used as bait for pulldown of ERG-binding proteins from VCaP cell lysates. Eluted proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. For Mass spectrometry, PAGE gel slices were digested with trypsin, and high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) analysis of tryptic peptides was performed with a Thermo Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography systems (Dionex).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of AR Interactome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following treatment of R1-D567 cells with 2Gy RT, cell lysates were incubated with Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen) pre-coupled with AR antibody (Sigma) or an irrelevant IgG control, eluted at 95°C, separated by SDS-PAGE, proteolytically digested overnight with trypsin (Promega) following reduction and alkylation with DTT and iodoacetamide (Sigma–Aldrich). Samples then underwent solid-phase extraction cleanup with Oasis HLB plates (Waters) and were analyzed by LC/MS/MS, using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Electron) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography systems (Dionex). MS operated in positive ion mode with a source voltage of 2.2 kV and capillary temperature of 275°C. MS scans were acquired at 120,000 resolution and up to 10 MS/MS spectra were obtained in the ion trap for each full spectrum acquired using higher- energy collisional dissociation (HCD) for ions with charge 2–7. Dynamic exclusion was set for 25s. Raw MS data files were converted to a peak list format and analyzed using the central proteomics facilities pipeline (CPFP), version 2.0.3(18 (link)). Label-free quantitation of proteins across samples was performed using SINQ normalized spectral index Software (18 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Membrane Protein Extraction and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were subjected to Dounce homogenation on ice in 250 mM sucrose/10 mM Tris pH 7.4 with cOmplete protease inhibitor (Roche). Cell debris was pelleted and the supernatant was spun at 2000 g for 60 min to pellet membrane. Membranes were washed and reconstituted with 4 X Laemmli buffer for SDS-PAGE. Protein bands were excised and digested overnight with trypsin (Pierce) following reduction and alkylation with DTT and iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich). The samples underwent solid-phase extraction cleanup with Oasis HLB plates (Waters) and the resulting samples were analyzed by LC/MS/MS, using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography systems (Dionex). Raw MS data files were converted to a peak list format and analyzed using the central proteomics facilities pipeline (CPFP), version 2.0.343 (link),44 (link). Peptide identification was performed using the X!Tandem45 (link) and open MS search algorithm (OMSSA) search engines against the human protein database from Uniprot, with common contaminants and reversed decoy sequences appended46 (link). Label-free quantitation of proteins across samples was performed using SINQ normalized spectral index Software47 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomic Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neuronal CM samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by in-gel trypsin digestion (Shevchenko et al., 2006 (link)). The extracted peptides were analyzed on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid Mass Spectrometer coupled with the UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano liquid chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were loaded on Acclaim PepMap100 Nano-Trap Column (100 μm × 2 cm, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were resolved at 300-nl/min flow rate using a linear gradient of 10% to 35% solvent B (0.1% formic acid in 95% acetonitrile) over 95 minutes on an EASY-Spray column (50 cm × 75 μm ID, Thermo Fisher Scientific). MaxQuant (v1.5.5.1) software was used for quantitation and identification of proteins from the mass spectrometry data using mouse UniProt database (released on May 2018) with common contaminant proteins (Cox and Mann, 2008 (link)). Search parameters included, a) trypsin as a proteolytic enzyme with up to 2 missed cleavages; b) first search peptide mass error tolerance of 20 ppm and the main search peptide mass error tolerance of 4 ppm; c) fragment mass error tolerance of 20 ppm; d) carbamidomethylation of cysteine (+57.02146 Da) as a fixed modification: e) oxidation of methionine (+15.99492 Da) and protein acetyl (+42.01056 Da) on N terminus as dynamic modifications. Peptides and proteins were filtered at 1% false-discovery rate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Circadian Proteomic Profiling of Fetal SCN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (n = 16) of pooled fetal SCN were processed at Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Biocev (Prague, Czech Republic). Briefly, total proteins were extracted and digested, and peptides were subsequently analyzed on Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid Mass Spectrometer coupled with UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano liquid chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). MaxQuant software package v.1.6.10.43 was used to gain final LFQ intensity values of 3,707 unique proteins in all samples; additional 183 peptides were assigned to 2 or more proteins and ca. 1,940 peptides showed undetectable LFQ in one or more samples; these were excluded from the analysis. Normalized data were then evaluated by Biocycle with P < 0.01 required to report potentially significant circadian change in protein levels across time points.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!