The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Inspect s50b

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Czechia

The Inspect S50B is a high-performance scanning electron microscope (SEM) designed for advanced materials analysis. It features a stable electron beam and high-resolution imaging capabilities to provide detailed visualization and characterization of a wide range of samples. The core function of the Inspect S50B is to enable users to obtain high-quality, high-magnification images and data about the surface topography and composition of their samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using inspect s50b

1

Characterizing Blood Clotting on Bone Grafts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 4.0 g of bone grafting nanomaterial was weighed and placed in six Petri dishes with a diameter of 6 cm. In order to control the speed of blood clotting, six additional empty Petri dishes were prepared. Whole venous blood (60 mL) was collected from a male volunteer who provided consent for the study. Prior to conducting the study, the Ethics Committee on Medical Research of the Medical Institute of Sumy State University approved the protocol. Next, 5 mL of blood was immediately added to each dish containing the bone grafting nanomaterial. The samples were gently stirred with a glass rod to ensure even distribution of the blood. A timer was started as soon as the blood was added, and it was stopped once a clot had formed. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, bone grafting nanomaterial with coagulated blood weighing approximately 0.5 g was fixed in a 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution and then dehydrated in alcohols of increasing concentration for 24 h. Once dry, the samples were covered with a 30–50 nm layer of silver using a vacuum set-up VUP-5M (SELMI, Sumy, Ukraine). The SEM images of the blood clot on the hydroxyapatite were captured using an FEI Inspect S50B (FEI, Brno, Czech Republic) with an Everhart–Thornley secondary electron detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Biofilm Morphology of ESKAPE Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell morphology and arrangement of ESKAPE pathogens in biofilms were assessed using SEM. Small glass slides (0.5 × 0.5 cm) were placed in 24-well plate wells containing 2 mL Mueller-Hinton broth with bacterial cells at 5 × 105 CFU/mL concentration and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. Then, samples were divided into three groups. The first and second groups were added with AgNPs-1 and AgNPs-2 diluted in Muller-Hinton broth at 20 µg/mL concentration. The third group was added to Muller-Hinton broth. After that, all samples were incubated for 24 h. Then, the media were discarded. Samples were washed three times with PBS, fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 60 min, dehydrated in ethanol-water mixture with increasing ethanol concentrations (65%, 75%, 85%, 95%, and 100%), and air-dried overnight. Dehydrated specimens were coated with a thin film of silver in a sputter coater. Morphological analysis was performed by the examination of the SEM (Inspect S50-B, FEI, Brno, Czech Republic; accelerating voltage −15 kV) images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Morphological Characterization of PEO Coatings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology analysis of the obtained coatings was conducted by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Phenom ProX, Phenom-World BV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, accelerating voltage = 25 kV). The pore size and pore distribution were described by the Trial Version Image-Pro 10.0.7 software. The elemental composition of the oxide coatings was characterized by an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer attached to the SEM.
The oxide layers’ cross-sections were determined to study the morphology and thickness of the PEO coatings. PEO modified samples were embedded in epoxy resin (Eposir F 740 + Ipox EH 2260) and then placed in a vacuum unit for 3 min before drying. Then, all samples were air-dried for 24 h and ground with a grinding machine (Einhell TH-US 400, 1440 rpm) using abrasive papers (Hermes BW114) with 400, 1000, 1200 and 1500 granulation. The morphology and chemical composition of the oxide layer structures were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEO-SEM Inspect S50-B, FEI, Brno, Czech Republic; accelerating voltage-15 kV) paired with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (AZtecOne with X-MaxN20, Oxford Instruments plc, Abingdon, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sponge Ultrastructure Imaging Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sponges were removed from blood, placed in 2% glutaraldehyde for 2 h, then dehydrated samples were placed in ethanol and dried. To avoid surface charge accumulation in the electron-probe, samples were covered with a thin (30–50 nm) layer of silver in the vacuum set-up VUP-5M (SELMI, Sumy, Ukraine). The SEM images of sponges were observed by FEI Inspect S50B (FEI, Brno, Czech Republic) with the Everhart–Thornley secondary electron detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!