The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hoechst

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

Hoechst is a laboratory equipment product offered by Agilent Technologies. It is designed for conducting specific assays and experiments in a controlled laboratory environment. The core function of Hoechst is to provide a reliable and precise tool for researchers and scientists to carry out their work. No further details about the intended use or interpretation of the product's capabilities are provided.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using hoechst

1

Measuring Oxidative Stress in HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine if H2O2 treatment was effective in producing oxidative stress on treated HUVECs, ROS production was assessed using specific dyes. Intracellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide radical (O2) were determined using 2,7-Dichlorofluorescein Diacetate (DCFHDA) and Dihydroethidium (DHE), respectively. Immediately after H2O2 treatment, cells were washed with PBS, and incubated with DCFHDA (50 μM) (Ref. D6883-50MG Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), DHE (50 μM) (Ref. D1168 ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and Hoechst (30 nM) (Ref. H3570 ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) diluted in fresh supplemented DMEM w/o phenol red for 60 min. All procedures were performed in darkness. Fluorescence was read with a Synergy HTX Multi-Mode microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc.,Winooski, VT, USA) at the following excitation/emission wavelengths: 518/606 nm for DHE; 495/520 nm for DCFHDA; and 350/461 nm for Hoechst. Microscopic visualization of fluorescent dyes was used as an internal control to verify the coherence of the data obtained with the spectrophotometer. DCFHDA and DHE fluorescence were normalized by Hoechst fluorescence, and data were reported as fold change of fluorescence relative to non-H2O2 treated cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mitochondrial Superoxide Measurement in Aβ42-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated with 10 μM Aβ42O for 24 h following preincubation with or without 30 μM PL171 for 4 h. At the end of treatment, cells were costained with 2.5 μM MitoSOX Red mitochondrial superoxide indicator (Invitrogen, M36008) and 3 μg/mL the nuclear staining dye Hoechst (Beyotime, C1022) for 20 min at 37°C. The fluorescent signals were recorded using BioTek SynergyNEO at 510/580 nm (excitation/emission) for MitoSOX and 350/461 nm for Hoechst. The MitoSOX fluorescence signal was normalized to the Hoechst.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescent Microscopy of Mitochondria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WT and LRRC8A‐KO HAP‐1 cells were plated as described above. Following a 24‐hr incubation, cells were stained with 1 µg/ml Hoechst (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the number of cells was quantified using the Lionheart Fx (BioTek). Cellular mitochondria were stained with 200 nM Mitotracker Deep Red (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 20 min; cells were then fixed and permeabilized with 0.1% triton X and stained with Phalloidin for 30 min. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst, and cells were imaged at 60× under oil using the Lionheart Fx (BioTek).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Tumor Debris Uptake by Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EpCAM+ JAR cells and MB49 CEA-expressing cells were labeled with the fluorescent dye PKH26 (Sigma-Aldrich) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Labeled JAR cells, MB49 wt or MB49-CEA cells were heat-shocked at 45°C for 10 min to induce necrosis, followed by incubation at 37°C overnight. The heat-shocked cells were then centrifuged and the supernatant containing necrotic tumor cell line debris was collected. Raji cells were labeled with the nuclear dye Hoechst 33,342 (Thermo Scientific) and cultured with necrotic debris and titrated antibodies (CD40×EpCAM, CD40×CEA or anti-CD40 mAb). Images were captured using a Cytation 5 live cell imager (BioTek) and the number of PKH26-stained tumor debris co-localized with Hoechst-stained Raji cells was quantified using Gen5 software (BioTek).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Targeting Necrotic Tumor Debris

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 13

Materials and Methods

MB49 CEA overexpressing cells were labeled with the fluorescent dye PKH26 (Sigma-Aldrich) according to manufacturer's instructions. Labeled MB49-CEA cells were heat-shocked at 45° C. for 10 min to induce necrosis, followed by incubation at 37° C. over night. The heat-shocked cells were then centrifuged and the supernatant containing necrotic tumor cell line debris was collected. Raji cells were labeled with the nuclear dye Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Scientific) and cultured with necrotic debris and titrated antibodies (ffAC_05337 or 1132). Images were captured using a Cytation 5 live cell imager (BioTek) and the number of PKH26-stained tumor debris co-localized with Hoechst-stained Raji cells was quantified using Gen5 software (BioTek).

Results

A dose-dependent increase in clusters of necrotic debris from a CEA-transfected MB49 tumor cell line with Raji cells was seen when the CD40×CEA targeting ffAC_05337 bsAb was added, but not with the monospecific CD40 Ab 1132 (as shown in FIG. 24).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Cellular Oxidative Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular ROS production was detected using the ROS Assay Kit (Beyotime, S0033). Briefly, cells were initially seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well and subsequently treated with or without 10 μM Aβ. After completion of the treatment, the cells were co-stained with 10 μM DCFH-DA and 3 μg/mL Hoechst (Beyotime, C1022) at 37 °C for 20 min. Then, cells were washed twice with PBS, and the ROS levels were determined using BioTek SynergyNEO (BioTek, Winusky, VT, USA) at excitation/emission wavelengths of 488/525 nm for DCFH-DA and 350/461 nm for Hoechst. Alternatively, the cells in the 96-well black plate were observed using a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Operetta, Perkin Eimer, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of Lipid Droplet Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HepG2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 4 × 103 cells/well and adhered overnight. The medium was changed to DMEM supplemented with 62 µM sodium oleate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to induce the presence of lipid droplets [42 (link)] and two different concentrations of plant extracts (final concentration of 30, 10 µg/mL; dilution 1:200 of stock concentration). After 6 h, cells were stained with 75 ng/mL Nile red (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 µg/mL Hoechst 33342 (Sigma Aldrich) in HBSS. After incubating at 37 °C for 10 min and in the absence of light, cells were washed twice with HBSS. Fluorescence was read in a Synergy HT multi-detection microplate reader (Biotek) at 485/572 nm excitation/emission for Nile red and 360/460 nm for Hoechst. Following this, cells were fixed with ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for 1 h at 4 °C in the dark and then washed four times with ddH2O to remove all the TCA. After being air-dried, the cells were stained with sulforhodamine B (SRB) in 1% acetic acid for 15 min and rinsed quickly with 1% acetic acid five times to remove unbound SRB. Plates were air-dried and bound dyes were solubilized with 150 µL Tris–HCl (10 mmol/L, pH 10.5) before reading the absorbance at 492 nm with the reference at 650 nm in a multi-detection microplate reader (Biotek, Synergy HT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for GluA1 mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digoxigenin (DIG) was used for DIG-labeled RNA probes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using tyramide signal amplification was performed to detect GluA1 mRNA. Mouse hippocampal neurons cultured on a chip were washed in 1× PBS and fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 min at RT. Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at RT. After 1× PBS washing, cells were rehydrated for 5 min at RT, in 2× saline sodium citrate and 50% formamide, and hybridized for 2 hours at 37°C with the DIG-RNA probe denatured in 80°C for 5 min. Cells were washed for 1 hour in 0.1× saline sodium citrate, 50% formamide, and 0.1% NP-40 at 50°C. Cells were blocked with 10% FBS in TN buffer (0.1 M tris and 0.15 M NaCl; pH 7.5) and incubated with anti–hnRNP A2/B1 and anti–PSD-95, and a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated anti-DIG antibody (Roche), at 4°C, overnight. After three washes for 10 min in TNT buffer (0.1 M tris, 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20; pH 7.5), cells were incubated in Cy3-conjugated tyramide signal amplification plus working solution (PerkinElmer) for 5 min at RT. Cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488– or Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated secondary antibodies followed by three washes for 10 min each. Cells were then stained with Hoechst for nuclei visualization and mounted with fluorescent mounting medium (Dako).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Assessment of Islet Implants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were euthanized under anesthesia by exsanguination via cardiac puncture, the right kidney was removed, fixed in 10% formalin (vol/vol) and processed for histology. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on 4 μm kidney paraffin sections.
The expression of human C-peptide and glucagon in the implants were assessed by immunofluorescence using specific antibodies. Sections were dewaxed and hydrated, boiled in citrate buffer (1X) at 100 °C for 20 min and then incubated with PBS-0.1% Tween-0.1% bovine serum albumin (wt/vol) for 30 min at room temperature to block the unspecific reactivity. Subsequently, sections were incubated overnight with the specific antibodies: anti-human C-peptide and anti-human glucagon (1:200; Abcam). In the negative control the primary antibodies were omitted or substituted with non-immune human IgG. Then the sections were incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies (1:500 Goat anti Rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 and Goat anti mouse Texas Red (Invitrogen), subsequently with Hoechst 1:500 (Dako) for 10 min and then mounted with Fluoromount (Sigma). Microscopy analysis was done using a Cell Observer SD-ApoTome laser scanning systems with 20X objective (Carl Zeiss). Analysis was performed in a blinded fashion with AxioVision 4.8 software (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bioenergetic Profile of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A XF96 extracellular flux analyzer (Agilent Technologies) was applied to determine the bioenergetic profile of intact cells. Hematopoietic stem cells were harvested, seeded onto poly-d-lysine–coated XF96 plates (7 × 104 cells per well), and incubated in RPMI medium (Agilent Technologies; supplemented with 5 mM glucose, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 1% FBS) for 1 hour in a CO2-free incubator. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was first measured in basal conditions (named as basal respiration) before cells were sequentially treated with 1.5 μM oligomycin (MilliporeSigma), 1 μM FCCP (MilliporeSigma), and 0.5 μM rotenone/antimycin A (MilliporeSigma) and 8 μM Hoechst (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Recorded OCR after all treatments was defined as non-mitochondrial respiration, which was subtracted from all OCR parameters. ATP production was calculated by the difference between the basal and oligomycin-inhibited respiration; maximal respiratory capacity was obtained as the rate of respiration after uncoupler FCCP treatment. Hoechst-positive cells were counted by a Cytation machine (Agilent). The number of live cells was normalized to individual sample for a final evaluation of sample OCR by Wave software (version 2.6.3, Agilent).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!