The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

311 protocols using jmp version 13

1

Multifactorial Analysis of Cytokine Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using JMP version 13.2, and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute; Cary, NC). Variables were analyzed using three-way analyses of variance (diet × exposure × time). Relevant pair-wise comparisons were generated using Fisher’s LSD test. For cytokine analysis, all values below the lower limit of detection (LLOD) were replaced with the LLOD/sqrt(2). LDF data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, and data from the time series were analyzed using 3-way ANOVAs. All differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Analysis of Treatment Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Differences among groups were analyzed by un-paired t-test. Statistical significance was assessed at P<0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted by JMP version 13.2 (SAS Institute, NA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Metabolic Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean ± standard error. Normality was determined by Shapiro-Wilk test. Differences among groups were analyzed by unpaired t-test and one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey–Kramer test, for normally-distributed data and Steel-Dwass test for non-normally distributed data. A two-tailed P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the JMP version 13.2 software program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NA, USA).
Detailed methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Handgrip Strength and Cognitive Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 13.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States). The data were expressed as mean (SD) for normally distributed continuous values (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test), and median (interquartile range [IQR]) for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Demographic and clinical data were presented according to the respective distribution type. Differences between groups were determined using an unpaired t-test for normally distributed values, and the Mann–Whitney U-test and c2 test, followed by Fisher’s exact test, for clinical characteristics, biochemical parameters, and handgrip strength.
Correlation coefficients were analyzed to establish the association with MCI, while multivariate linear regression analyses were used to clarify the relationship between MoCA-J scores and handgrip strength, clinical characteristics, and biochemical parameters; statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Normality Assessment and Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mean and standard deviations are shown for normally distributed variables and the median and interquartile range are shown for non-normally distributed variables. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Numeric, and nonparametric numeric variables were compared using the Fisher exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Inter-rater agreement for T.F. and M.H. on the presence or absence of hyperintensity on ASL and DWI data was assessed with linear kappa (κ) coefficients. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP version 13.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA), with p < 0.05 considered to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison: MV, MS, and Combination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The median and IQR were used when calculating the diagnostic agreement rate for all images. McNemar tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity among diagnoses made based on MV alone, MS alone, and the combination of MS and MV. Fisher’s exact tests with 95% CIs were used to compare the PPV and NPV among the three diagnostic methods. Fleiss’ kappa statistic was used to assess the diagnostic agreement between images.
Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05/3 using the Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons (MV alone vs. MS alone, MV alone vs. the combination of MS and MV, and MS alone vs. the combination of MS and MV). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare lesion characteristics between patients correctly diagnosed based on MV alone and those correctly diagnosed based on the combination of MS and MV, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. JMP version 13.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used to perform the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Analysis of Megafauna and Coral

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data for each transect were standardized as number of observations of fauna divided by number of images included from that transect. A two-way crossed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare Recovering and Still Trawled sites at depths of 350, 450, and 600 m for two groups: Total Megafauna, including all of the morphotypes listed above, and Coral, which included all cnidarians except soft substrate–associated sea pens, fast-growing wire corals, and encrusting species that were difficult to accurately quantify by count methods. All statistical comparisons were performed in JMP version 13.2 (SAS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fisher’s exact probability test was used to compare data between the two groups. The mean values and standard deviations for age and tumour diameter were calculated and analysed by the t-test and F-test. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyse non-parametric variables, which are expressed as median, interquartile range, and overall range. Multivariate analysis was performed for the comparison of the accurate surgical indication group and overtreatment group. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed on items that showed significant differences in univariate analysis, and the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 for both univariate and multivariate analyses. JMP version 13.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cytokine Analysis and Pathology Scoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using JMP version 13.2, and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute; Cary NC). Variables were analyzed using three-way analyses of variance (diet × treatment × time). Relevant pair-wise comparisons were generated using Fisher’s LSD test. For cytokine analysis, all values below the lower limit of detection (LLOD) were replaced with the LLOD/sqrt(2). Pathology scores were analyzed using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Wilcoxon Rank-sum test for pairwise comparisons. All differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Tumor Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fisher’s exact probability test was employed for comparison between the two groups. For tumour diameter and age, the F-test was performed to determine whether distributions exhibited equal variance between the two groups. If the F-test showed significance, the median, interquartile range, and overall range were calculated and analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test by tumour diameter and age. If the F-test showed no significance, the mean ± standard deviation was calculated and analysed using the t-test by tumour diameter and age. Statistical significance was set at p-value of <0.05 for both univariate and multivariate analyses. JMP version 13.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!