The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using axis ultra x ray photoelectron spectrometer

1

Evaluating Paper Morphology and Mechanics After HPEC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To explore the effect of HPEC on the paper, the morphology, composition as well as mechanical performances of the papers before and after HPEC treatment were measured. The morphology was observed on a scanning electron microscope (Quanta 200, FEI), and the composition was characterized by a Rigaku D/Max-2500 X-ray diffractometer, a Perkin Elmer FT-IR spectrophotometer with ATR mode, and a Kratos Axis Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. The degree of polymerization of paper cellulose was estimated by the determination of intrinsic viscosity as described in the literature27 (link). Tensile tests were performed on a universal testing machine equipped with a 100 N load cell at a deformation rate of 20 mm/min. Before testing, all samples were dried in air for 24 h and then stored for at least 48 h in a desiccator with a RH of 58% to achieve a complete equilibrium. For comparison, the paper samples treated by the only rGPM5.0 hydrogel for 6 min and dipped in water for 6 min were also used for the tensile test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electrochemical Analysis of Modified Carbon Fiber Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cyclic voltammetric studies, electrochemical oxidation behavior of bare CFP, NCS/CFP and MnO2–Pi–NCS/CFP electrodes, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were conducted using an electrochemical analyzer. The SEM (Zeiss Gemini, model Ultra 55) clubbed with EDAX was used to capture microscopic images and elemental composition, respectively. XRD patterns were captured using Bruker AXS D8 Advance X-ray Diffractometer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies (Kratos Axis Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer) employed polychromatic MgKα X-rays ( = 1253.6 eV). The surface analysis of bare and modified CFP electrodes was conducted using ZETA-20, Z10002-1-1 optical profilometer (KLA-Tencor, US-CA). Images were taken using 50× and 20× lens, with a working distance of 1.00 mm, and analysis of the images was done using Zeta 3D software. The roughness of the surfaces was analyzed at 12 different areas on CFP and the average value with the standard deviation was reported. ATR- FTIR spectra (Shimadzu, IR spirit-00107) were recorded in the frequency range of 400–4000 cm−1. The product formed was analyzed using 1H NMR spectroscopy (Bruker 400 MHz).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the samples were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JEOL JSM-6390) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM-2100F). The crystal structures of the products were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8-Advance X-ray diffractometer, Cu-Kα source, λ = 1.5406 Å). N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were obtained using a Micromeritics Tristar 3000 surface-area and pore-size analyzer. A Kratos Axis Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Al-Kα source) was used to record X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Polymer Composition Analysis via XPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymer samples at various stages of the synthesis process were analyzed using x-ray photoelectron spectrophotometer to detect changes in the surface elemental composition. Samples included unmodified SR, aminated SR, Hep-SR, NO-SR, and Hep-NO-SR. XPS analysis was performed using a Kratos Axis Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Kratos, Ltd., UK) with a monochromatic Al Kα X-rays source (1486.6 eV). The pressure in the sample chamber was ca. 1 x 10−9 Torr. Binding energies of all the elements were calibrated relative to the carbon with C1s at 284.8 eV. The data analysis was performed with CasaXPS software associated with the instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stock solutions were characterized in MilliQ water by placing a drop on copper grids (Cu, 3 mm, 250 mesh square, SPI-grids) and letting it dry for 1 h before analysing it with TEM (Valeta CM 100 Phillips, operating voltage 100 kV). FT-IR spectroscopy was performed on powder samples using a Nicolet Magna 750 IR spectrophotometer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was acquired in energy spectrum mode at 210 W, using a Kratos Axis Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. Samples were prepared as films drop-cast from solution onto a copper foil substrate.
Size of Au NP in Elendt M7 was determined by Dynamic Light Scattering using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS at 20 °C. A backscattering angle of 173° was used to determine the observed light. Each agglomeration experiment was run with three replicates using 30 measurement runs of 1 mL sample solution in 1 × 1 cm plastic cuvettes. Stokes–Einstein equation was used to calculate the hydrodynamic diameter of the Au NP using the cumulant method for fitting the autocorrelation function (Kretzschmar et al. 1998 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XPS experiments were performed using a Kratos axis ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer, which uses monochromated Al Kα radiation as the X-ray source and the total energy resolution is ~0.5 eV. All spectra were acquired at a normal takeoff angle at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of TiO2 Nanotube Arrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A JEOL JSM6301FXV scanning electron microscope (SEM) with a field emission electron source running a 5 KV was used for the microstructure characterization of the TiO2 nanotubular arrays with and without the peptide coating. Chemical state analysis of the samples was carried out with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a Kratos AXIS Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. A monochromatic Al source, operating at 210 W with a pass energy of 20 eV and a step of 0.1 eV, was utilized. All XPS spectra were obtained using the C1s line at 284.6 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Nanoparticle Characterization Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoparticles were characterized by UV–VIS spectroscopy for their extinction properties (Agilent Technologies: Cary 60, Malaysia), and by X-ray diffraction for their compositional information (X'Pert Pro XRD). They were further characterized with high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), scanning tunnelling electron microscopy (STEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using JEOL 2010 FEG STEM with Oxford EDS and JEOL Neo ARM 200CF TEM equipped with aberration correlation and Oxford Aztec EDS. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were taken using a Kratos AXIS ULTRA X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer. XPS samples were prepared by drying the samples at 90 °C for 1 h and being collected in a powdered form. The samples were scanned, resulting in a full range scan as well as a high-resolution scan for Nitrogen, Oxygen, Titanium, and Nickel. Raw response data from the XPS were normalized via an assumption of summations between normal distributions and matched to existing libraries of binding energies. The Ni loadings on TiN were determined by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using Agilent ICP-MS 7900. The samples for ICP-MS were prepared by drying the sample at 70 °C for 8 h under vacuum, the collected dry powder sample was then dispersed in 1% nitric acid solution at the concentration of 1 mg/L.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Material Characterization Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) measurements were detected by a Prodigy ICP from Teledyne Leeman Labs. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on an Axis Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer from Kratos Analytical with an exciting source of Al Kα = 1486.7 eV. The binding energies obtained in the XPS spectral analysis were corrected for specimen charging by referencing C 1 s to 284.8 eV, and Powder X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) was performed on a Philips X’Pert Pro Super diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) were carried out on a FEI TECNAI F20 field emission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The inductively coupled plasma mass spectrum (ICP-MS) was detected by an ELEMENTAL XR ICP-MS from Thermo Fisher.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Photoanodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology and elemental analysis of the samples were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (FE-SEM/EDX, Hitachi SU8030). TEM and HRTEM analyses were conducted using a transmission electron microscope (JEOL2100 Plus, Japan). The crystalline phases of photoanodes were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Bruker, D2 Phaser) using the Cu Kα1 radiation in a 2θ range of 20°–80°. The light absorption spectrum and photocatalytic activity were investigated with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (JASCO V-630). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were measured with a Kratos Axis ULTRA X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. Furthermore, electrochemical impedance spectra were measured in an AC potential frequency range of 100 000–0.1 Hz with an amplitude of 10 mV. Z-view software was used to fit the Nyquist spectrum to obtain the equivalent circuit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!