The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Opalescence boost

Manufactured by Ultradent
Sourced in United States

Opalescence Boost is a professional in-office whitening system. It is designed to effectively whiten teeth through the use of a hydrogen peroxide-based formula.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using opalescence boost

1

In-office tooth bleaching protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bleaching agent used in this study was Opalescence Boost, with a 38% concentration of hydrogen peroxide (Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, UT, USA). This product is commercially available in 2 syringes, one containing hydrogen peroxide and the other containing the thickening agent. These syringes were coupled together, and the plunger was alternated 8 times to correctly mix the product.
The desensitizing treatment prior to bleaching was carried out using Desensibilize KF 2% (FGM Dental Products, Joinville, SC, Brazil). This product contains 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride and is commercially available as a gel contained in a single syringe. Ibuprofen (in the form of drops of a suspension) was used at a concentration of 40 mg/kg body weight and administered by gavage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparison of Office Bleaching Agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, Perfect Bleach Office+ (VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) with 35% HP and Opalescence Boost (Ultradent Products Inc., South Jordan, UT, USA) with 40% HP were used as the office bleaching agents. At the end of the 14th day of staining, all of the specimens were taken out of the distilled water and dried by using blotting paper and air flow. Following the color measurements, the bleaching agents were applied approximately 1 mm to the one surface of each specimen. While Perfect Bleach Office+ (PBO) was applied for 15 min, Opalescence Boost (OB) was applied for 20 min and they were activated by a microbrush at every 5 min according to the manufacturers' instructions. At the end of the time required for the bleaching procedure, the specimens were washed with a high pressure water flow and dried with blotting paper and air flow.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Enamel Bleaching with Hydrogen Peroxide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the specimens were bleached using 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence® Boost, Ultradent, USA) on the enamel surfaces according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The thickness of the bleaching agent that was applied on each tooth’s enamel surface was 0.5 - 1 mm. After 20 minutes, it was washed with distilled water and dried using air syringe for 30 s. The bleaching procedure was applied twice, as recommended by the manufacturer’s instruction manual, for optimal results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In-Office and Combined Bleaching Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients included in the study were subjected to one in-office bleaching session in their first appointment. The gingival tissue of the teeth to be bleached was isolated using a light-cured resin dam and 38% hydrogen peroxide gel (Opalescence Boost, Ultradent, Indaiatuba, SP, Brazil) was applied over the buccal tooth surfaces. Peroxide was maintained undisturbed for 45 min in a single application, according to prior clinical trial (17) that did not find difference between the protocol used in the present study and three consecutive 15-minutes applications (manufacturer`s recommendation). Thereafter, based on the randomized list, the patients allocated to the combined technique received a customized tray and a bleaching agent (10% carbamide peroxide, Opalescence PF 10%) (Ultradent) to be inserted into the tray before at-home bleaching. These participants were instructed to perform the at-home bleaching procedure using the filled tray for at least 4 h every day during 7 consecutive days. The other participants, allocated to the in-office technique only, returned after 1 week for a second in-office tooth bleaching session following the same protocol described previously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Whitening Effectiveness on Resin Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Table 1 presents a list of tested materials. The resin composites tested have different indications and compositions: a micro hybrid, indicated to be used in anterior (G-aenial anterior [G-Ant], GC, Tokyo, Japan); a micro hybrid (G-aenial posterior [G-Post]), suggested to be used in posterior; GC, Tokyo, Japan) and a universal nano hybrid resin composite (G-aenial A’chord [G-ACH], GC, Tokyo, Japan) used both in anterior and posterior teeth. A2 shade was selected in all groups for standardization of the color.
The selection criteria for the whitening procedures were: different compositions of the materials; including in-office whitening (40% Hydrogen Peroxide [HP], Opalescence Boost, Ultradent, South Jordan, USA [IOW]); at-home whitening (Opalescence,10% Carbamide Peroxide [CP], Ultradent, South Jordan, USA [AHW]) and four different OTC products, namely a prefilled tray (Opalescence Go, 6%HP Ultradent, South Jordan, USA [PT]); a whitening pen (6% HP, Cavex Bite&White, Cavex, Haarlem, Nederland [WP]); a whitening toothpaste (Opalescence, Ultradent, South Jordan, USA [WT]) and a whitening mouth rinse (2% HP, Listerine Advanced White, Johnson & Johnson, New Jersey, USA [WMR]), (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tooth Bleaching Techniques Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All surfaces of the specimens, expect one long surface, were covered with nail varnish. All the specimens were divided into four groups (N = 20) as follows:
C: Immersed only in distilled water (37°C) as the control group
Home bleaching (HB): Bleached by DayWhite ACP (Discus dental, Stamford, CT, USA) [Table 1], as home-bleaching agent, which was applied on the surfaces for 30 min per day.
In-office bleaching (IB): Bleached by Opalescence Boost (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) [Table 1], as IB agent, for 20 min each 4 days.
HIB: Bleached by a combination of previous agents by means of 30 min per day for the HB agent and 20 min each 4 days for the IB agent.
The bleaching procedure was accomplished in 14 consecutive days. After each bleaching interval, the specimens were rinsed by distilled water (37°C) to wash away any bleaching agent remnants in 1 min, and immersed in distilled water (37°C) which was renewed daily.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bleaching Agent Manipulation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bleaching agent (Ultradent Opalescence Boost, USA) was manipulated according to the manufacturer’s recommendations [Table 1]. Postbleaching, the gel was then removed from the samples, rinsed with distilled water, blot-dried, and kept in salivary substitute for 2 weeks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Whitening Effectiveness Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
• G1 (HP3), 35% HP (Whiteness HP; FGM Produtos Odontológicos Ltda., Joinville, SC, Brazil) associated with RC (Whiteness HP; FGM Produtos Odontológicos Ltda., Joinville, SC, Brazil), 3:1 ratio; • G2 (HP1), 35% HP (Whiteness HP; FGM Produtos Odontológicos Ltda., Joinville, SC, Brazil) associated with RC (Whiteness HP; FGM Produtos Odontológicos Ltda., Joinville, SC, Brazil), 1:1 ratio; • G3 (positive control), 38% HP (Opalescence Boost;
Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA); • G4 (negative control), the tooth was immediately restored after the endodontic treatment, using etchand-rinse adhesive system and composite resin, without bleaching protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Dental Pulp Stem Cell Response to Bleaching

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were implanted on the dentin side of the disc. After attachment, the enamel-dentin disc was overturned in the medium to expose the enamel surface above the liquid level with a 1 mm gap; the enamel surface was surrounded by a light cured resin barriers (Opalescence PF; Ultradent Products, South Jordan, Utah [UT], US) to prevent the bleach from spilling into the medium (Fig. S1). After that, approximately 0.5 mL of thickened bleaching gel was daubed on the enamel surface at 37 °C. We tested two concentrations of bleaching gel, 40% H2O2 and 15% carbamide peroxide (Opalescence Boost and Opalescence PF, respectively; Ultradent Products, South Jordan, Utah [UT], US)6 (link). Five groups were created: G1, untreated DPSCs; G2, 15% bleaching gel for 90 min; G3, 15% bleaching gel and 1 μM HC030031 (TRPA1 inhibitor, ApexBio; ApexBio, Houston, Texas [TX], US) for 90 min; G4, 40% bleaching gel for three 15-min periods in a row; and G5, 40% bleaching gel and 1 μM HC030031 for three 15-min periods in a row. As a small molecule drug that inhibits TRPA1, HC030031 can be used as a tool to study the role of TRPA1 channels in pain23 (link). In the inhibition group, HC030031 was dissolved in the culture medium to directly inhibit TRPA1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Hydrogen Peroxide Treatments for Coral Bleaching

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different hydrogen peroxide-based treatments were tested (n = 5 for each treatment, see Table 1). A prototype of an in-situ liquid applicator, consisting of flexible aquaria tubing (2 cm in diameter) cut in half lengthwise to create an open chamber and coated and secured with silicone glue, was created to deliver a direct application of 30% hydrogen peroxide to BBD lesions. A one-way valve was used to allow the injection of hydrogen peroxide from a 60 ml blunt tipped plastic syringe into the chamber and, as the hydrogen peroxide entered, a second valve allowed seawater to escape. The prototype was filled with approximately 30 ml of hydrogen peroxide and held directly on the lesion for approximately one minute (S1A Fig). Additionally, a tooth whitening gel, Opalescence™ Boost™, containing 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence™ Teeth Whitening Systems, Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) was applied directly to the lesion and covered with marine epoxy (All-Fix Epoxy, Lafayette Hill, PA, USA) to help secure the gel to the coral (S1B Fig). In another treatment, the whitening gel was mixed with a delivery vehicle, Base2B (Ocean Alchemists LLC, Tampa FL, USA), which was applied directly to the lesion and anchored approximately every 5 cm with marine epoxy to hold the ointment in place (S1C Fig).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!