The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using iblot semi dry transfer apparatus

1

Western Blotting Protocol for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were prepared and quantified according to established methods. To each well of a 4–12 % or 12 % SDS-polyacrylamide gel, 15–30 μg total protein was applied, electrophoresed, and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane using an iBlot semi-dry transfer apparatus (Life Technologies). Membranes were blocked using Tris-buffered saline with 5 % nonfat milk (pH 7.6; Sigma). Primary antibodies used in this study were SDHA, SDHB, Histone H3 (Abcam), PRODH/POX, NDUFA10, Complex III Rieske FeS (Santa Cruz), Dimethyl Histone H3 (K4), Dimethyl Histone H3 (K36), COX IV (Cell Signaling, Danvers MA), β-actin (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), and subsequently by a secondary anti-mouse/anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). All blots were washed in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (pH 7.6; Sigma). Detection was done using an ECL kit (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA). Signals were quantified using Image Studio Light V5 (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Huntingtin Protein Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE using 3–8% Tris-acetate gels or 4–12% Tris-bis gels (Life Technologies) then transferred to nitrocellulose using iBlot semi-dry transfer apparatus (Life Technologies) or Trans-Blot Turbo (BioRad) and developed using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific). Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel or Prism (GraphPad Software). Pixel intensity quantification was performed using ImageJ (NIH) and signal for Huntingtin was standardized to signal for GAPDH. Some blots were stripped before re-probed using Reblot (Millipore) per manufacturer’s instructions. The stripping buffer is pH 13.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Protein Analysis via SDS-PAGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE using 3–8% Tris-acetate gels or 4–12% Tris-bis gels (Life Technologies); proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose using iBlot semi-dry transfer apparatus (Life Technologies) and developed using ECL or gels were stained using the Silver Stain Plus kit (BioRad). Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel or Prism (GraphPad Software). Pixel intensity quantification of 16-bit images was performed using ImageJ (NIH) and signal intensity for Huntingtin was standardized to signal intensity for β-tubulin or GAPDH. The bands were manually traced in ImageJ and the area and mean gray values of each band were determined. Total signal intensity was calculated by multiplying mean gray value by area to determine the total pixel intensity per band.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!