The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Clc main workbench v 6

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in United States, Denmark

CLC Main Workbench v. 6.9.2 is a bioinformatics software tool for visualizing and analyzing biological sequence data. The core function of the software is to provide a comprehensive platform for tasks such as DNA/RNA sequence analysis, genome assembly, and comparative genomics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using clc main workbench v 6

1

Phylogenetic Analysis of Badnaviruses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing data were processed and analysed using CLC MAIN WORKBENCH v. 6.9.2 (QIAGEN) and GENEIOUS v. 11.0.2 (Biomatters) computer software. Sequences were compared to all known badnaviruses on the NCBI database using BLAST algorithms available on the NCBI website (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The presence of putative ORFs was predicted using GENEIOUS v. 11.0.2 and SNAPGENE software (GLS Biotech). Virus sequences were further aligned and analysed with the CLUSTALW multiple alignment application using BIOEDIT v. 7.1.9 sequence alignment editor program (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html). Phylogenetic trees were constructed from CLUSTALW-aligned sequences on MEGA v. 7.0 (http://www.megasoftware.net/mega.php), using the maximum-likelihood method and a Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replications. Pairwise sequence comparison (PASC) was carried out on aligned sequences using GENEIOUS v. 11.0.2 computer software. For taxonomic purposes, the 1.2 kb polymerase gene covering the RT/RNase H domains was used to compare sequences from the different genera in the family Caulimoviridae while the core 529 bp sequence of the RT/RNase H-coding region (excluding the BadnaFP/RP primer binding sites) was used to compare sequences from TaBV and TaBCHV isolates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bioinformatic Analysis of Sequencing Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sanger‐derived sequences were trimmed to remove primer‐binding sites and analysed using CLC Main Workbench v6.9.2 (Qiagen, USA) and Geneious v11.0.2 (Biomatters, New Zealand). For RNAseq data, adapter sequences were removed using the fastx_clipper and reads were further trimmed to attain optimum quality using the DynamicTrim function of SolexaQA++ v.3.1.3 software (Cox, Peterson, & Biggs, 2010 (link)) and fastx‐trimmer module of FASTX‐Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). De novo assembly of reads from each sample was performed using Trinity v.2.0.3 (Grabherr et al., 2011 ) and virus contigs were identified by BLASTn analysis against the NCBI‐derived local virus database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/Viruses/) using a blast command line analysis (Altschul, Gish, Miller, Myers, & Lipman, 1990 (link)). Reads were subsequently mapped onto reference sequences using CLC Genomics Workbench v.7.5.1 (https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/) and Geneious Prime 2000 (Biomatters) with default parameters. ORFs were predicted and annotated using Geneious Prime 2000 and sequences were designated ‘complete’ based on comparison with the reference sequence used for mapping. Processed Sanger and NGS data were compared to sequences on the NCBI database using BLAST algorithms available on the NCBI website (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PCR Detection and Sequencing of Eimeria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two PCR fragments representative of each Eimeria species detected were sequenced to confirm amplicon identity and validate PCR detection, resulting in 14 sequences from 31 positive reactions (45 %). Amplicons were purified using a Qiagen PCR purification kit, cloned using pGEM-T Easy (Promega, Madison, USA) in XL1-Blue MRF Escherichia coli (Stratagene, La Jolla, USA), miniprepped (Qiagen) and sequenced (GATC Biotech, Konstanz, Germany) as described by the respective manufacturers. Sequence assembly, annotation and interrogation were undertaken using CLC Main Workbench v6.0.2 (CLC Bio, Katrinebjerg, Denmark) and sequences were identified using BLASTn against the GenBank non-redundant database with default parameters. The sequences have been submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers LT549029-LT549042.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Typing of Eimeria tenella

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard PCR amplification was completed using MyTaq DNA polymerase (Bioline). Briefly, each PCR reaction contained 1 μl template DNA (commonly containing between 10 and 50 ng), 1 μl of each of the relevant forward and reverse primers (10 μM stock) and 12.5 μl of MyTaq ×2 mastermix, made up to a final volume of 25 μl using molecular grade water (Sigma). Negative controls included molecular grade water as template. Positive controls included reference strain genomic DNA representative of each SNP type. Thermal cycler parameters were: 1× initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 35× (denaturation 15 s at 95 °C, annealing 15 s at 56 °C, extension 1 min at 72 °C), followed by a final extension phase of 72 °C for 7 min. All primers used were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys and are shown in Table 1. PCR amplicons were sequenced on both strands using the same primers employed in their original amplification (GATC Biotech). Sequence assembly, annotation, and interrogation were undertaken with CLC Main Workbench v6.0.2 (CLC Bio; (CLCBioinformatics, 2015 )) using BLASTn against the reference E. tenella Houghton genome sequence assembly to confirm identity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!