The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using discovery ct750

1

Multimodal MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural and functional MRI data were acquired on a 3-T GE scanner (Discovery CT750, Willowick, OH, USA) at the Radiology Department of Remin Hospital of Wuhan University. Functional data were collected using echo planar imaging (EPI) utilizing the following parameters: TR = 2000 ms; TE = 30 ms; flip angle = 90°; matrix = 64 × 64; FOV = 220 mm. A total of 99 volumes (including 4 dummy scans) were obtained, and each volume consisted of 32 interleaved axial slices (slice thickness = 4 mm; gap = 0.6 mm). For anatomical reference, high-resolution structural imaging was also applied with the following parameters: TE = 3 ms; flip angle = 7°; matrix = 256 × 256; FOV = 256 mm; slice thickness = 1 mm; and no gap in 188 sagittal slices.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whole-Body Low-Dose CT Imaging Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT examinations were performed without administration of intravenous or oral contrast medium on one of our six multidetector CT scanners (SOMATOM Force, SOMATOM Definition Flash, SOMATOM Definition Edge; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany; GE Discovery, GE Revolution; VCT, Boston, MA, USA; IQon Spectral, Philips, Best, the Netherlands). Patients were scanned in supine position, with head first and the arms straight beside the body and hands placed over the upper thighs. The field of view was adapted to the patient’s circumference.
WBLDCT imaging parameters per used device are depicted in Table 1.

Whole-body CT imaging parameters per device

DeviceNo. of slices per rotationTube voltage (kVp)Tube current modulation parametersCollimation widthRotation time (s)Pitch
Revolution CT, GE25612020 (noise index)80 mm0.50.992
Discovery CT750, GE6412020 (noise index)40 mm0.50.984
Definition Edge, Siemens12812070 (quality reference mAs)38.4 mm0.51
Definition Flash, Siemens12812070 (quality reference mAs)38.4 mm0.51
SOMATOM Force, Siemens19212070 (quality reference mAs)57.6 mm0.51
IQon, Philips12812012 (dose right index)40 mm0.51.171
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Postoperative CT Assessment of DBS Surgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Postoperative CT (Discovery CT750, GE Healthcare), with spiral scanning, 100 KV, 350 mA, and 2.0 mm slice thickness, was performed both 2 h and 1 week after surgery to assess the electrode position, pneumocephalus volume, and complications such as intracranial hemorrhage or electrode offset. The electrode fusion error compared with preoperative planning was defined as the Euclidean difference between the intended and actual trajectories of electrodes on the axial plane of the intended target. The deviation in X- and Y- coordinate vectors of the DBS lead on the intended target Z-plane were measured on each side of the fused images both 2 h and 1 week after surgery, and the total deviation (D) of the electrodes between the intended and actual trajectories was calculated as D =  X2+Y2 . The Tao’s DBS surgery scale, including electrode implantation duration, postoperative pneumocephalus volume, and electrode fusion error, was used to assess the DBS surgery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT images were obtained with the following parameters: (field of view, 30 to 36 cm; beam pitch, 1.35 or 1.375; gantry speed, 0.5 or 0.6 second per rotation; 120 kVp; 150–200 mA; and reconstruction interval, 1–2 mm). Various CT scanners manufactured by different vendors were used, including 16‐, 40‐, and 64‐MDCT scanners and a second‐generation dual‐source scanner. A total of 165 CT scans were performed: a second‐generation dual‐source system (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare [25 studies]; or Discovery CT 750, GE Healthcare [20 studies]), a 64‐MDCT scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba Medical Systems [eight studies]; LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare [72 studies]; Brilliance 64, Philips Healthcare [1 studies]), a 40‐MDCT scanner (Brilliance 40, Philips Healthcare [36 studies]), and a 16‐MDCT scanner (Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens Healthcare [3 studies]).
Scanning was performed from the thoracic inlet to the middle portion of the kidneys. All CT data were reconstructed using high‐spatial‐frequency and soft‐tissue algorithms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CT Imaging Protocol for Contrast-Enhanced Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT examinations were performed using 2 scanners with intravenous contrast media. The volume of the contrast media was determined by multiplying the body weight (in kilograms) by 2 to a maximum of 100 mL. The concentration of the iodinated contrast media was 350 mg/mL with an injection rate of 2 mL/s. The scanning parameters of the 2 scanners were as follows: (1) The 128-channel CT scanner (Discovery CT750, GE Healthcare, US): field of view, 25 cm; matrix, 512 × 512; tube voltage, 120 kVp; tube current, 200–400 mA; reconstructed thickness, 5 mm; (2) The 128-channel CT scanners (Somatom Definition or Definition AS + , Siemens Healthcare, US): field of view, 35 cm; matrix, 512 × 512; tube voltage, 80–120 kVp; tube current, 248–578 mA; reconstructed thickness, 5 mm. Finally, the arterial phase images of the CT examination were anonymized and assigned a research code for the assessment of general imaging features and the extraction of texture features.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Dual-Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty-eight patients underwent CT from the diaphragm to the iliac crest. Unenhanced CT and dual-phase contrast enhancement spectral spiral CT scans were performed using a spectral CT scanner (Discovery CT 750, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). Contrast medium containing 350 mg of iodine per ml (Omnipaque™; GE Healthcare, Cork, Ireland) was injected at a flow rate of 3 ml/s via the elbow vein. The dose of the contrast medium was calculated as 1.5 ml per kg body weight. Scanning was triggered when the CT value of the aortic arch reached 100 HU. Contrast-enhanced CT images were acquired with a scanning delay of 30 s in the arterial phase and 70 s in the portal venous phase after the start of intravenous contrast medium injection [11 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Automated CT Image Segmentation and Reconstruction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The average HU in each fragment was determined by computing the mean in a region of interest generated with an automatic segmentation algorithm. The algorithm combines thresholding [32 ] and hole filling [33 ] to generate the region of interest. A more complete explanation of the algorithm can be found in [17 ].
CT images were acquired on two scanners with a variety of x-ray energies and reconstruction algorithms. On a Discovery CT750 [GE, Waukesha, WI] images were acquired using both a soft tissue and bone reconstruction kernel at 80, 100, 120, and 140 kVp. Dual energy images were also acquired and effective monoenergetic reconstructions were obtained at 60, 80, 100, 120, and 140 keV. The 60 and 140 keV reconstructions were used to generate bone mineral density (BMD) estimates [34 (link)]. Images were also acquired using the system’s iterative reconstruction algorithm (commercially know as Veo) at 80, 120, and 140 kVp.
Images from a Somatom Force [Siemens, Erlangen, Germany] were acquired at 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, and 150 kVp using both a soft tissue and bone reconstruction kernel. At 120 and 140 kVp, a series of images reconstructed with kernels ranging from broad to narrow were acquired and, at 150 kVP, some images were acquired using an x-ray tin filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Volumetric CT Lung Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-lung volumetric multidetector CT was acquired for all 89 subjects on a GE Discovery CT750 scanner at inspiration (i.e. total lung capacity (TLC)) and full expiration (i.e. residual volume (RV)) using the SPIROMICS imaging protocol of 120 kVP with the current adjusted to meet CT dose index volume targets for expiration and inspiration using three settings, large (BMI>30), medium (BMI 20–30), and small (BMI<20) with vendor-specific reconstruction kernels (Standard, B, B35, FC03) (30 ). CT data reconstructed using the “standard” kernel was analyzed in this study. Quantitative CT data were presented in Hounsfield units (HU), where stability of CT measurement for each scanner was monitored monthly by use of the COPDGene phantom (32 (link)). For reference, ideal air and water attenuation values should be −1000 and 0 HU, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke CT Scan Dataset

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This is a secondary use of existing clinical CT scans. Based on the REB approval, 200 patient CT images were obtained: The first non-contrast whole-head CT scans of patients who were newly identified with a primary diagnosis of acute hemorrhagic stroke between January 1st 2011 and January 1st 2018 across Fraser Health, British Columbia. The samples were retrieved using non-probability sampling based on accessibility at the time of data preparation44 (link). Patients with history of hematomas or with hemorrhage due to tissue plasminogen activator administration for treatment of ischemic stroke were excluded. Out of the retrieved data, we randomly selected 55 CT image sets (52.7% male; mean age = 64.1 ± 14.9 years) applying a random data generator. The images were then annotated and pixel-wise labeled for use in the study (i.e., there were 780,894,208 labeled voxels per CT scan). The CT dataset contained images that were acquired using several models of CT scanners, including GE Discovery CT750, GE LightSpeed VCT, and Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Automated Renal Parenchymal Analysis using CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent abdominal and pelvic CT examinations (Discovery CT 750, GE Medical Systems, USA; or Aquilion One, Toshiba, Japan). The imaging parameters were as follows: slice thickness, 0.625 mm; pitch, 0.984; gantry rotation time, 0.5 s; tube voltage, 120 kV; and automatic tube current modulation, 100–200 mA. A 5-mm interval was used for CT image reconstruction.
All patients' CT Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images were transferred to a dedicated image analysis workstation equipped with an open source software (Fire Voxel, New York University, NY, USA), and then processed by an abdominal radiologist in a double-blinded manner. First, renal parenchyma of two sides were drawn on the superior and inferior layers of the axial kidney image. The software automatically filled the entire kidney according to the Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold to obtain a volume of interest (VOI), including the renal cortex and medulla. Second, the VOI was magnified, and the edges were manually modified to ensure that all functional renal parenchyma was contained while hydronephrosis, calculi, and cysts were avoided (Figure 1). Third, RCMs (morphological and CTTA parameters) were automatically calculated based on the final VOI, including RPV, HU, parenchymal voxel, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!