The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti tgf β1

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

Anti-TGF-β1 is a laboratory reagent used to detect and quantify the presence of the transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) protein in biological samples. It is a specific antibody that binds to TGF-β1, allowing for its identification and measurement.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

35 protocols using anti tgf β1

1

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction and Western blotting experiments were performed as described previously [12 (link)]. Primary antibodies used were as follow: anti-TGF-β1, CDK4, c-Myc, CyclinD3, p27, phospho-Akt, Akt, phospho-Erk1/2, Erk1/2, phospho-JNK, JNK, phospho-p38, p38, phospho-Smad 2, Smad 2/3, Smad 4, and Histone H3 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); anti-CD63, CD81, and CD9 (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA); and anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich). HRP-conjugated horse anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling) were used as secondary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Heart Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysates from heart samples were loaded on and separated by a 10–15% SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, MA, United States). The membranes were probed with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C after blocking with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween (TBST). The primary antibodies were anti-TGFβ1, anti-TGFβ receptor I (TGFβRI), anti TGFβ receptor II (TGFβRII), anti-phosphorylated Smad2/3, anti-Smad2/3, and anti-Smad4 (Cell Signaling Technology, shanghai, China), anti-collagen I and III (Col I and III, Proteintech, Wuhan, China), anti-α-SMA, anti-periostin, anti-ACE (Abcam, Shanghai, China) and anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Multi Sciences, Hangzhou, China). Membranes were washed by TBST for three times and then incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. After another three times wash by TBST, the signal was detected on FluorChemE (Protein Simple, CA, United States). The densities of bands were quantified by an ImageJ Analysis System and expressed as ratios to GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis in Kidney Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells and kidney tissues were washed with PBS and lysed in the M-PER mammalian protein extraction reagent with protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Proteins were separated with 8–15% SDS-PAGE and then were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Madrid, Spain) by electroblotting. The membrane was blocked for 1 hour at room temperature and then was incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-Shh, anti-E-cadherin, anti-Smad2, anti-Smo, anti-Gli-1 (1:1000, Santa Cruz biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-fibronectin (R&D system Inc. Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-Bax, anti-Bcl-2, anti-TGF-β1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), and α-SMA (1:1000 Abcam Inc. Cambridge, MA, USA) primary antibodies. Subsequently, the membranes were stained with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or mouse immunoglobulin G (1:2,000, Santa Cruz biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The immunoreactive bands were detected by chemiluminescence (enhanced chemiluminescence; BioFX Laboratories Inc., Owings Mills, Maryland, USA). GAPDH (1:2,000, Santa Cruz biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) was used as an internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Kidney Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot was performed using kidney cortex as described in our previous study [25 (link)]. The primary antibodies were anti-KEAP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; 1:1,000), anti-NRF2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1,000), anti-Histone H3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:500), anti-4-HNE (Alpha Diagnostic, San Antonio, TX, USA; 1:3, 000), anti-3-NT (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA; 1:1,000), anti-TGF-β1 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA; 1:500), anti-COL4 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1:500), anti-FN (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:500), anti-Smad7 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1,000), anti-Smad3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1,000), anti-p-Smad3 (Cell Signaling; 1:500), anti-p-JNK (Cell Signaling; 1:500), anti-PDCD4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1,000), anti-t-JNK (Cell Signaling; 1:1,000), anti-Actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:2,000) and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:3,000). These antibodies were routinely validated when they arrived from suppliers with previous positive tissues that had been defined either based on the knockout or overexpression of the target protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from cells as previously described. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology; China) containing 1% protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) or 20 mM N-ethylmaleimide as appropriate (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, U.S.). The lysates were separated on an 8% or 12% SDS-PAGE gel and then transferred to nitrocellulose filter membranes. After being blocked in 5% non-fat milk, the membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-PML (1:500 dilution; MBL, Nagoya, Japan), SUMO-1 (1:200 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.), SUMO-2/3 (1:500 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.), UBC9 (1:500 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, U.S.); RNF4 (1:500 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.); anti-TGF-β1 (1:500 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, U.S.) and anti-HERG (1:500 dilution; Alomone labs, Jerusalem, Israel). GAPDH (1:10,000 dilution; Research Diagnostics, Concord, MA, U.S.). Goat anti-rabbit (1:10,000 dilution; Alexa Fluor 700 conjugated; Molecular Probes/Life Technologies) served as the secondary antibody. Immunoblots were imaged using an LI-CORE Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, U.S.) and Odyssey software was used for quantification of bands normalized to GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining of TGF-β1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in plates which contained glass coverslips. Then, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes. Subsequently, cells were permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 10 minutes. Cells were then blocked in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hour, followed by incubation with anti-TGF-β1 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.; Boston, MA, USA) overnight. Following cells were incubated with DyLight™ 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Scientific) for 1 hour. Nucleus were stained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 minutes. A confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus FV1000) was used to observe fluorescence intensities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The spinal cords were freshly collected and homogenized in tissue lysis buffer. The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected and stored at − 80 °C. The Bradford method (Bradford, 1976) was performed to quantitate protein concentration. SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was performed by using a 12% polyacrylamide gel and 30 μg/well protein, and separated protein was then transferred for 45 min onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBST (20 mM Tris base, 130 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies: anti-IL-20, anti-TGF-β1 (Cell Signaling), and anti-β-actin (Proteintech®). After primary antibody incubation, the membrane was washed with TBST. Following the wash steps, the membrane was incubated with species-specific horseradish peroxidase-labeled (HRP) secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Following the final wash steps, the membrane was developed with enhanced chemiluminescent substrate and visualized on film (FUJI MEDICAL X-RAY FILM, FUJIFILM, Japan). The protein signals were digitalized by a scanner and analyzed by the Image-pro plus 4.5.1 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of TGF-β1 and SMAD Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime) and quantified using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Subsequently, 30 µg protein sample was separated by 10% SDS‐PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat milk for 2 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies for western blot analysis were as follows: anti‐GAPDH, anti‐TGF‐β1, anti‐SMAD1, anti‐pSMAD1, anti‐SMAD5, and anti‐pSMAD5 (all from Cell Signaling Technology). Membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase‐labeled secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) for 1 h at room temperature. Protein signals were visualized using chemiluminescence reagent (Beyotime) and captured using Invitrogen iBright 1500 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Results were analyzed using ImageLab software (Version 5.0; Bio‐Rad Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of TGF-β Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells and tissues were lysed in prechilled RIPA buffer containing phosphatase inhibitors, protease inhibitors and PMSF. The protein lysates were separated by 10% SDS‐PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The membranes were blocked in 5% skimmed milk in 1× PBS‐T (0.5% Tween‐20) and incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: anti‐EHF (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), anti‐TGF‐β1 (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), anti‐SMAD2 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐SMAD3 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐p‐SMAD2 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐p‐SMAD3 (Cell Signaling Technology) or anti‐SMAD4 (Cell Signaling Technology). Anti‐tubulin (Proteintech Group, Wuhan, China) and anti‐histone3 (Proteintech Group) were used as protein‐loading controls. Blots were incubated with HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, and visualized with ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Immunoblotting signals were detected by densitometry using Quantity One Software (Bio‐Rad, West Berkeley, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histopathological Evaluation of Radiation-Induced Fibrosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were sacrificed for histopathologic evaluation 14 weeks after irradiation. The skin and soft tissue of the irradiated leg was formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, cut into 4 μm sections, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin using standard procedures. To detect collagen accumulation in fibrotic tissues, Masson's trichrome staining was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Diagnostic BioSystems, Pleasanton, CA). For the immunohistochemical analysis, deparaffinized slides were incubated with anti-TGF-β1 (Cell Signaling), anti-PAI-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-SMA (abcam), anti-MMP2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-MMP9 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p300 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CBP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-acetylated p65 (Cell Signaling) primary antibodies, and subsequently with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The DAB+ chromogen were used for signal detection (Dako Real Envision detection kit; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Representative images of the brown staining within fibrotic regions were captured and evaluated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!