The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Version 3

Manufactured by Cytoscape
Sourced in United States

Cytoscape version 3.7.1 is a software platform for visualizing complex networks and integrating these with any type of attribute data. It provides a core set of features for network layout, analysis, and visual customization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

160 protocols using version 3

1

Visualizing Molecular Interaction Networks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The small molecule–protein and protein–protein networks were visualized using Cytoscape version 3.7.2 (https://cytoscape.org/), and the topology in this network was analyzed in this program. A node denotes a small molecule/gene interaction, an edge denotes an association interaction or any other well-defined relationship, and the degree indicates the number of edge connections. Thus, nodes with a high degree can be key nodes in a network [35 (link)]. The functional annotation of genes was analyzed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) ver. 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html, updated January 14, 2020). Functional annotation analysis of the selected genes from the PPI network was performed using DAVID. KEGG pathways with p value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant [29 (link),30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Construction of Human PPI Network

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PPI data in human genomes were extracted from version11.0 of STRING (https://string-db.org/cgi/input.pl), a weighted interaction database with physical and functional interactions that are integrated from multiple data sources. To construct a PPI network with high confidence edges, we filtered the STRING with threshold 0.4 and only interactions with weight above the threshold were selected for the newly constructed PPI network.
The visual network graphs were created by Cytoscape (version 3.7.2) (http://www.cytoscape.org/), an open-source software platform for visualizing complex networks [22 (link)]. The target interaction network parameters were calculated by NetworkAnalyzer. Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) of Cytoscape was used to search the highly connected subnetworks in the PPI network.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The online database STRING (https://string‐db.org/) was used to generate a protein‐protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs.43 Cytoscape (version 3.7.2) software was used to construct the molecular interaction networks, with a combined score of >0.4.44 The MCODE clustering algorithm was used to identify highly interconnected regions.45 The following criteria were used to define the regions: degree cutoff = 2, node score cutoff = 0.2, max depth = 100, and K‐score = 2. To screen for specific functional genes, we assessed the overlap between the top 10 genes identified by four different methods (degree, edge‐percolated component, maximal clique centrality, and maximum neighborhood component) based on the Cytoscape plug‐in cytoHubba.46Gene expression levels and survival rates were assessed using the boxplot function and survival analysis function according to Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA).47 The hub genes for subsequent analyses were defined based on the log‐rank test results of the Kaplan‐Meier (KM) estimator (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Resveratrol Pharmacology Network Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pharmacology network is comprised of nodes and edges. The entities that make up the nodes of the networks are resveratrol NDs and related target genes. The Cytoscape version 3.7.2 was used to constructed networks, which is a java based open source software (Demchak et al., 2014 (link)). Functional pathways of resveratrol related to NDs were analyzed using GO enrichment and KEGG pathways analysis based upon the database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) version 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) (Ke et al., 2019 (link)). P < 0.05 suggested the enrichment degree had statistically significant and the pathway results might be essential functional mechanisms of resveratrol in the treatment of NDs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mapping the Therapeutic Networks of Dangshen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The network of active compounds and therapeutic targets was constructed by linking the compounds and therapeutic targets to understand the complex interactions between the compounds of Dangshen and the therapeutic targets of OS. The network of therapeutic targets and organs was established by linking therapeutic targets and their distribution in organs to clarify the relationship between the therapeutic targets and organs with increased expression of the target. The therapeutic targets' PPI network was built by linking the therapeutic targets to their interacting targets. Next, Cytoscape version 3.7.2 (http://www.cytoscape.org/) was used to present the networks mentioned above, which is a software program for network visualization [34 (link)]. Lastly, NetworkAnalyzer [35 (link)] was used to calculate three topological parameters of each node in the network, including the degree, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identifying Lung Cancer Target Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The putative target genes of ADI and lung cancer were overlapped to identify the shared target genes for ADI to treat lung cancer. These common putative target genes were input into the search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes (STRING) 11.0 database (https://string-db.org/) [32 (link)] to construct the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network. To guarantee the robustness of outcomes, the screening threshold in the STRING database was set as interactions score ≥ 0.9. Next, the PPI networks were visualized and analyzed using Cytoscape (version 3.72) [33 (link)]. Degree, betweenness, closeness were three important indexes to describe a protein's topological importance in the network. In the PPI network, nodes met with all the following topology value criteria were considered as hub target genes in the network: (1) with the degree greater than double of the median degree; (2) with betweenness greater than the median betweenness; (3) with closeness greater than the median closeness.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Identification of Protein-Protein Interaction Hub Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The STRING26 (link)
(http://string-db.org) online database was used to determine the interaction genes, and the interaction parameters were set to a maximum confidence of >.4.27 (link)
To fully understand the functional interactions between proteins and select essential hub genes, the PPI network was visualized and analyzed with Cytoscape (version 3.7.2) software (http://www.cytoscape.org/), and hub genes were screened with cytoHubba,28 (link)
a plug-in of Cytoscape software.
cytoHubba was used to rank genes in the PPI network from highest to lowest according to the maximum neighborhood component (MNC), density of maximum neighborhood component (DMNC), maximal clique centrality (MCC), and degree method scores (degree). The top 10 genes were selected in each algorithm, and the common genes were identified as hub genes. Finally, nine hub genes were obtained.29 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Various proteins have numerous reactions in the human body because there are many protein–protein interactions in the human body [11 (link),12 (link)]. PPI analyses were performed using the STRING database (https://string-db.org/, version 11.5, accessed on 14 April 2023) with a medium confidence score (≥0.400). The PPI’s topology was analyzed and visualized using Cytoscape version 3.7.2 (https://cytoscape.org/, accessed on 14 April 2023), with node colors of red (large nodes) and blue (small nodes) [13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ferroptosis-Related Signature for HCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before establishing the model, the ferroptosis-related genes from WGCNA were tested by univariate Cox regression analysis (p <0.001). Furthermore, ferroptosis-related lncRNAs co-expressed with ferroptosis-related genes were screened by Pearson correlation test (correlation coefficient >0.4, and p <0.001). The lncRNAs were further screened by univariate Cox regression analysis (p <0.001). Then, the selected ferroptosis-related genes and lncRNAs were merged to establish the model. A network containing the ferroptosis-related mRNA-lncRNA network was constructed and visualized by Cytoscape (version 3.7.2)
HCC patients from the TCGA liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) cohort were randomly divided into a training group, and another 50% were set as the test group. The LASSO Cox regression algorithm was applied to select the ferroptosis-related signature. Finally, a formula for the risk score was established, and we calculated the risk score for each patient as follows:
Coefi indicates the correlation coefficient of each ferroptosis-related signature, and X indicates the level of gene expression. The median risk score in the training cohort was set as the cutoff value, and the training group and test group were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups according to the cutoff.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identifying Therapeutic Targets in SCI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PPI networks are constructed from protein targets. that interact among themselves to execute certain biological processes such as cell signaling, regulation of gene expressions, metabolic pathways like energy production, and regulation of cell cycle checkpoints [12 (link)]. The STRING database v.11 (https://string-db.org/) was utilized to identify potential therapeutic targets of UA related to SCI pathology within the PPI network, setting the species type to “Homo sapiens” and a high confidence score (0.9) [13 (link)]. Following this, the Cytoscape (version 3.7.2) software (https://cytoscape.org) was used to visually output the PPI network.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!