The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Synapt hdms qtof mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Synapt HDMS QTOF mass spectrometer is a high-resolution, quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer designed for advanced analytical applications. It features a high-definition mass spectrometry (HDMS) system that provides enhanced sensitivity and resolution for accurate mass measurements and in-depth structural analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using synapt hdms qtof mass spectrometer

1

Intact Mass Analysis of PLpro Inhibitor Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Waters Synapt HDMS QTOF mass spectrometer was used to measure the intact protein mass of PLpro with and without preincubation with inhibitors to detect covalent adduct formation. To prepare the samples, 2 μL of 20 mM inhibitor stocks in DMSO were added to 100 μL PLpro at 1 mg/mL concentration and incubated 1 h at room temperature. Previously described protocols for ultrafiltration and denaturing direct infusion63 (link) were implemented as follows. Samples were processed by ultrafiltration with a Vivaspin 500 10 kDa PES membrane by diluting the sample to 0.5 mL with 10 mM LC-MS grade ammonium acetate and reducing volume to 50 μL twice, followed by the same procedure with 2.5 mM ammonium acetate. Protein concentrations were estimated by A280 with a NanoDrop 2000, and samples were diluted to 2 mg/mL in 2.5 mM ammonium acetate, and then 10 μL were further diluted into 90 μL 50:50 acetonitrile:water with 0.1% formic acid. Sample was introduced into the electrospray ionization source by syringe pump at a flow rate of 10 μL/min and MS1 spectra were collected for m/z 400–1500, 5 s/scan, for 1 min. The protein monoisotopic mass was determined from the averaged spectra using mMass 5.564 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolomic Analysis by UPLC-QTOF-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolomic analyses were performed in a Waters Acquity UPLC chromatograph hyphenated to a Waters Synapt HDMS Q-ToF mass spectrometer (Waters, UK). Cells were processed and analyzed by following a previously optimized analytical strategy20 21 (link). In summary, different metabolome extractions were combined to obtain polar and nonpolar fractions, which were then analyzed separately by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and reversed-phase (RP) liquid chromatographic techniques (see Supplementary Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UPLC-HDMS-QTOF Glycosylated Precursor Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Acquity UPLC system interfaced with a Waters Synapt HDMS-QTOF mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization system (ESI) (Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK) was used to perform LC–HDMS analysis of glycosylated precursors. All samples were analyzed on a reversed phase (RP) ACQUITY UPLC 1.8 m 2.1 × 150 mm HSS T3 column (Waters) protected with an Acquity UPLC® BEH HSS T3 1.8 m, 2.1 × 5 mm precolumn (Waters), at 40 °C and with a mobile phase flow rate of 0.28 mL min−1. Water was used as the weak eluting solvent (A) and methanol as the strong eluting solvent (B); formic acid 0.1% v/v was added in both eluents. The multistep linear gradient used was as follows: 0–1 min, 100% A isocratic; 1–3 min, 100–90% A; 3–18 min, 90–60% A; 18–21 min, 60–0% A; 21–25.5 min, 0% A isocratic; 25.5–25.6 min, 0–100% A; 25.6–28 min 100% isocratic. The injection volume was 2 µL. Mass spectrometric data were collected in positive ESI mode over a mass range of 50–2000 m/z, with a scan duration of 0.3 s in centroid mode [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Conformational Analysis of α-LA by IM-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The conformation of α-LA forms was investigated by IM-MS performed on a Synapt HDMS Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Manchester, U.K.) using a nano-electrospray ionisation source. Samples were prepared in 100 mM ammonium acetate (pH 7.0) to a final concentration of 25 μM. DTT α-LA was formed by the addition of DTT (2 mM) and RCM α-LA was incubated in the presence of β-CN (1 : 0.5 molar ratio; RCM α-LA : β-CN). Samples were loaded into platinum-coated borosilicate glass capillaries prepared in-house. Gentle source conditions were applied to minimise gas-phase structural changes prior to detection, with instrument parameters as follows: capillary voltage, 1.60 kV; sampling cone, 30 V; extraction cone, 1.5 V; trap/transfer collision energy, 10/15 V; trap gas, 5.5 l/h; backing gas, ∼4.5 mbar. The parameters for IM were as follows: IM cell wave height, 8 V; IM cell wave velocity, 350 m/s; transfer t-wave height, 8 V; transfer t-wave velocity, 250 m/s. Mass spectra and arrival time distributions (ATDs) were viewed using MassLynx (v4.1) and DriftScope (v2.1), respectively (Waters Corporation, Manchester, U.K.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Untargeted Bile Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bile samples were separated and analyzed using a Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled to a Waters Synapt HDMS Q-TOF mass spectrometer under the following conditions: capillary volts 3kV, sample cone 40V, source temperature 150°C, desolvation temperature 400°C, cone and desolvation gas flow 50 and 900 L/h, respectively. Data was acquired in centroid mode in both positive and negative electrospray ionization modes, using sulfadimethoxine as the Lock Mass. Mass range acquired was 50 – 900 Amu at 0.3 second scans. Chromatography was carried out using a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1x50 mm) under acidic conditions using a water (A) and acetonitrile (B) containing 0.1% formic acid. The following gradient was used: initial conditions 98% (A) for 0.5 min, to 80% (A) at 6.5 minutes, to 70% (A) at 8.0 min, to 1% (A) at 8.5 min, held for one min, returning to initial conditions for two min for column equilibration. Total run time was 11.5 min. Column temperature was maintained at 40°C. All samples were injected at 5 μL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Cyanobacterial Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Accurate LC-MS data of cyanobacterial extracts were recorded with a Waters Acquity I-Class UPLC system and a Waters Synapt G2 HDMS mass spectrometer. High-resolution electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (HRESI-MS) data for synthetic compounds and cyanobacterial extracts were obtained by direct infusion of methanolic solutions on a Waters Synapt HDMS QTOF mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA). HPLC analyses for synthetic intermediates were performed using a Shimadzu LC-20-AT Series separations module equipped with Shimadzu SPD-M20A PDA (photo diode array) multiple wavelength detectors (180 nm-800 nm). For indole-isonitrile compounds, UV detector was set at 310 nm with a 5 nm slit-width. The overall system, CBM-20 was controlled using LC Solutions software. Raw data was plotted using Origin® software program after exporting absorbance data as an ASCII-formatted file. Analytical separations of stereoisomers (of cis and trans) mixtures were carried out on Daicel® (normal phase) AS chiral column. A 10% isopropanol/ 90% hexanes mixture was used as elution medium with a flow rate of 1 mL/min in an isocratic mode. Individual retention times for indole-isonitriles are reported along with analytical data for each isomer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gram-scale Synthesis of Compound 7

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used as received unless otherwise noted. Anhydrous acetonitrile (MeCN), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2), ethanol (EtOH), dimethylformamide (DMF), tetrahydrofuran (THF), methanol (MeOH), and diethyl ether (Et2O) were purchased from commercial sources and maintained under dry N2 conditions. Amide couplings and reactions with acid chlorides were performed under N2 using standard Schlenk-line techniques. Compound 1 was purchased from commercial sources and used as received. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in the listed deuterated solvent with a Bruker Avance III HD 500 MHz NMR spectrometer at 298 K with chemical shifts referenced to the residual protio signal of the deuterated solvent as previously reported.50 (link) Low-resolution mass data were collected on an Agilent 6470AA Triple Quadrupole LC/MS system. High-resolution mass data were collected on a Waters Synapt HDMS QTOF mass spectrometer. Following the initial synthesis and screening of compounds 2–15, compound 7 was produced on the gram-scale following the same procedures described below. Purity was analyzed by analytical HPLC and Thermo LTQ MS with electrospray ionization in the positive mode with a Waters BEH 130, 5 μm, 4.6 × 150 mm C18 column, linear gradient from 90:10 to 0:100 water/acetonitrile in 10 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. (Supplementary Data File 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Intact Mass Spectrometry of PLpro

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Waters Synapt HDMS QTOF mass spectrometer was used to measure the intact protein mass of PLpro with and without preincubation with inhibitors to detect covalent adduct formation. To prepare the samples, 2 μL of 20 mM inhibitor stocks in DMSO were added to 100 μL PLpro at 1 mg/mL concentration and incubated 1 h at room temperature. Previously described protocols for ultrafiltration and denaturing direct infusion52 (link) were implemented as follows. Samples were processed by ultrafiltration with a Vivaspin 500 10 kDa PES membrane by diluting the sample to 0.5 mL with 10 mM LC-MS grade ammonium acetate and reducing volume to 50 μL twice, followed by the same procedure with 2.5 mM ammonium acetate. Protein concentrations were estimated by A280 with a NanoDrop 2000, and samples were diluted to 2 mg/mL in 2.5 mM ammonium acetate, and then 10 μL were further diluted into 90 μL 50:50 acetonitrile:water with 0.1% formic acid. Sample was introduced into the electrospray ionization source by syringe pump at a flow rate of 10 μL/min and MS1 spectra were collected for m/z 400–1500, 5 s/scan, for 1 min. The protein monoisotopic mass was determined from the averaged spectra using mMass 5.5.53 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!