The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Em50 data logger

Manufactured by METER Group
Sourced in United States

The EM50 data logger is a compact, battery-powered device designed to collect and record environmental data. It features multiple sensor ports to accommodate a variety of environmental sensors, allowing users to capture and monitor various parameters such as soil moisture, temperature, and more. The EM50 data logger is a versatile tool for collecting and managing environmental data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using em50 data logger

1

Quantifying Microclimate Impacts of Solar Arrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two atmospheric profiling stations were installed 70 meters apart: one in the control area and one near the center of the solar panel area. Micrometeorological variables were collected at four levels (0.5, 1.2, 2.0 and 2.7 m aboveground) in 1 minute intervals. The gathered variables were (1) air temperature (VP-3 Decagon Devices), (2) wind speed and directions (DS-2 Decagon Devices), (3) relative humidity (VP-3 Decagon Devices) and (4) net radiation (PYR Decagon Devices). Data were logged on EM50 data loggers (Decagon Devices). Temperature and humidity devices were calibrated in a chamber, and wind sensors were calibrated in a wind tunnel prior to installation. A Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to detect differences in distributions of temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction, and down welling radiation between the solar array area and the control area. A two tailed t-test was used to detect differences in the mean temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction, and down welling radiation between the solar array area and the control area and standard deviation results was measured to quantify the amount of dispersion of a set of data values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Continuous Environmental Monitoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Air temperature (Ta) and RH (relative humidity) were continuously measured using EHT sensors with radiation shields (Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, WA). Water VPD (vapor pressure deficit) was calculated from the temperature and humidity data according to Goudriaan and van Laar (1994). PPFD (Photosynthetic photon flux density) was continuously measured using a QSO‐S PAR sensor (Decagon Devices Inc.). Volumetric soil water content (θv), at a depth of 5 cm, was continuously measured in each of the experimental plots using EC‐5 soil moisture sensors (Decagon Devices Inc.). All above‐mentioned sensors were connected to EM‐50 data loggers (Decagon Devices Inc.), recording half‐hourly means. Precipitation was measured with a RG2 rain gauge (Delta‐T Devices, Burwell, Cambridge, U.K.), and stored as half‐hourly means on a DL2 data logger (Delta‐T Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Soil Moisture Monitoring during Corn Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soil water content was measured at three depths within the profile (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 m) using 5TM soil moisture sensors (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA, USA). The sensors were connected to Em50 dataloggers (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA, USA) and measurements were recorded every 30 min during the corn growing season. The soil moisture sensors (blue triangles in Figure 1c) were installed on 30 May 2014.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Soil Sensor Monitoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In November 2014, eight 5TE sensors (Decagon Devices, Pullman, Washington, USA) were inserted at 10 cm depth of the soil in the center of each plot to monitor soil temperature, soil water content, and soil salt content. Data were automatically recorded at 2-h intervals by EM50 data loggers (Decagon Devices). Daily air temperature (HMP45C; Vaisala, Helsinki, Finland), precipitation (TE525 tipping bucket gauge; Texas Electronics, Dallas, Texas, USA), and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR; LI-190SB; Li-Cor, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA) were recorded automatically with an array of sensors installed 200 m away from the experimental site.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Greenhouse Cultivation with Soil Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiment was carried out for 60 days under greenhouse conditions (25/21 °C; 50/60% relative humidity, 14/10 h day/night photoperiod) at the greenhouses of the Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile. The watering regimes were applied 5 days post-transplantation via irrigation with the respective amount of tap water. Soil water content in the substrate of pots was measured in situ using GS3 sensors and EM 50 data loggers (Decagon® Devices, Pullman, WA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soil Moisture and Temperature Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MPS-2 sensors and EM-50 data loggers (Decagon Devices, United States) for continuously recording soil temperature and soil water potential (Ψsoil) were installed at each study site in spring 2014. Two to three MPS-2 sensors per soil depth were embedded in the front wall of the soil pit at 20, 80, and 140 cm depth (at 180–200 cm depth only in Chamoson and Saillon). Measurements of Ψsoil were temperature corrected to 22°C according to Walthert and Schleppi (2018) (link). Soil temperature and soil water potential (Ψsoil) have been recorded from spring 2014 onward in hourly intervals. In order to characterize the forest sites, daily data from year 2015 were calculated and divided into four annual quarters (January–March, April–June, July–September, October–December).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Soil Temperature and Moisture Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soil temperature and volumetric water content of topsoil horizon were recorded every minute in each mesocosm, using Em50 data-loggers (Decagon Devices, Inc., USA) and ECH2O EC-TM probes inserted at 3 cm depth. Soil temperature and moisture data used here (Nov. 2012 -Oct. 2013 ) are daily averages.
Author-produced version of the article published in : Soil biology and biochemistry, vol 80, p.296-305
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Monitoring Greenhouse and Field Microclimate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The meteorological factors, solar radiation (Rs, W m−2), relative humidity (RH, %), air temperature (Ta, °C), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD, kPa), for field and greenhouse experiments are shown in Figure 1. In the field experiment of 2016, meteorological data were recorded every 15 min from a weather station (Weather Hawk, Campbell Scientific, USA) 50 m away from the experiment field. In the greenhouse experiment of 2017, an automatic weather station (HOBO, Onset Computer Corp., USA) was installed in the middle of the greenhouse and data were collected every 15 min. VPD was calculated from RH and Ta (Norman, 1998 ). To measure soil water content (SWC, cm3 cm−3), one 5TE sensor (Decagon Devices, Inc., USA) was installed at the depth of 15 cm in three randomly selected containers in each treatment in both experiments. The data were collected every 30 min by an EM50 data logger (Decagon Devices, Inc., USA). Sensors were calibrated by optimizing gravimetrically and sensor-measured volumetric water contents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Paramo Microclimate Measurements in Colombia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements were taken on 21 paramo species from the Parque Ecológico Matarredonda (4°33’38.1” N and 74°0’7.3” W) located in the oriental range of the Colombian Andes. Elevation at this park ranges from 3,100 to 3,600 m.a.s.l. The mean annual temperature (MAT) at the study site is 8.8°C [26 (link)]; mean annual precipitation is 1,178 mm and the mean relative humidity is 88% [45 (link)]. To better describe the actual climate experienced by plants (microclimate) at the study site, we recorded air temperature at 30 cm above the soil surface every 30 minutes from December 2017 to December 2018 using an automatic recording system consisting of an EM-50 data logger (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA) connected to a VP-4 humidity and temperature sensor with a radiation shield installed (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Leaf Water Content Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the experiments were performed in September 2015 on 2 year old vines. Six plants were pruned as a single-cordon and grafted onto SO4 (V. berlandieri ×
V. riparia) rootstock. Vitis vinifera L. (cv “Colorino”) were used for the trials. The plants were arranged to 2 L pots filled with a peat:sand mix (2:1). The vines were acclimated to the same environmental condition (24 °C; 45.5% of relative humidity; approximately 660μmolm-2s-1 P.A.R.) inside the laboratory of the Department of physics at the University of Pisa, Italy. The measurements were performed under the same environmental conditions. Photon Flux measurements were conducted using em50 data logger (Decagon Devices, Inc.) equipped with a calibrated QSO-S PAR Photon Flux sensor. The environmental conditions, temperature and humidity, were measured with a calibrated usb temperature and humidity data logger (model IMD 100, Imagintronix Inc.). During the experiments, the photoperiod was 13 h 15 min day and 10 h 45 min night. For each of six plants all leaves fully extended and developed were sampled from the main shoot and, according to Kapos [29 (link)], the water content of leaves was determined by weighing the leaves immediately after sampling, drying at 105 °C, and reweighing 24 h later.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!