The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using ultimate 3000 nano uplc system

1

Shotgun Proteomics Analysis via HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed on a QExactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermofisher Scientific San Jose, CA) coupled with an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system and and EasySpray source. Peptides were separated by reverse phase (RP)-HPLC on Easy-Spray RSLC C18 2 um 75 μm id × 50 cm column at 50 C. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid and mobile phase B of 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile. Peptides were eluted into the mass spectrometer at 300 nL/min with each RP-LC run comprising a 90 minute gradient from 1 to 5% B in 15 min, 5–45% B in 90 min. The mass spectrometer was set to repetitively scan m/z from 300 to 1800 (R = 120,000), followed by data-dependent MS/MS scans (R = 45,000) on the twenty most abundant ions, normalized collision energy (NCE) of 27, dynamic exclusion of 15 s with a repeat count of 1. FTMS full scan AGC target value was 5e5, while MSn AGC was 1e5, respectively. MS and MSn injection time was 120 ms; microscans were set at one. Unassigned, 1, 7, 8, and >8 charge states were excluded from fragmentation. Mass spectrometry data is submitted in proteome exchange. The project Accession is PXD028492.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DIA-Based Peptide Identification Using QExactive HF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were randomized and 2ug of each was analyzed on a QExactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermofisher Scientific San Jose, CA) coupled with an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system and an EasySpray source. The LC settings were the same as what we described in the previous section. Data was acquired using Data Independent Acquisition (DIA). Mass spectrometer settings were: one full MS scan at 120,000 resolution and a scan range of 300–1650 m/z with an AGC target of 3e6 and a maximum inject time of 60ms. This was followed by 22 (DIA) isolation windows with varying sizes at 30,000 resolution. AGC target and injection time were set to 3e6 and auto, respectively. The default charge state was 4, the first mass was fixed at 200 m/z and the normalized collision energy (NCE) for each window was stepped at 25.5, 27 and 30.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Shotgun Proteomics Workflow Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed on a QExactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermofisher Scientific San Jose, CA) coupled with an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system and an EasySpray source. Peptides were separated by reverse phase (RP)-HPLC on Easy-Spray RSLC C18 2um 75 μm id × 50 cm column at 50 C. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid and mobile phase B of 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile. Peptides were eluted into the mass spectrometer at 300 nL/min with each RP-LC run comprising a 95 min gradient from 1 to 3% B in 5 min, 3–45%B in 90 min. The mass spectrometer was set to repetitively scan m/z from 300 to 1400 (R = 120,000) followed by data-dependent MS/MS scans on the twenty most abundant ions, dynamic exclusion with a repeat count of 1, repeat duration of 30 s, (R = 15,000) and a nce of 27. FTMS full scan AGC target value was 3e6, while MSn AGC was 2e5, respectively. MSn injection time was 32 ms; microscans were set at one. Rejection of unassigned, 1, 6-8 and > 8 charge states was set.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Orbitrap Fusion LC-MS/MS Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digested serum samples were first cleaned using a C18 spin plate (Nest Group, Southborough, MA, USA) and then analyzed using an Orbitrap Fusion tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with an Ultimate 3000 nano-UPLC system (Thermo Scientific). Two micrograms of reconstituted peptide (1 µg/mL) was first trapped and washed on a Pepmap100 C18 trap (5 μm, 0.3 × 5 mm) at 20 μL/min using 2% acetonitrile in water (with 0.1% formic acid) for 10 min and then separated on a Pepman100 RSLC C18 column (2.0 μm, 75 μm × 150 mm) using a gradient of 2 to 40% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid over 120 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min and a column temperature of 40 °C. Eluted peptides were introduced into an Orbitrap Fusion MS via nano-electrospray ionization source with a temperature of 300 °C and spray voltage of 2000 V. The peptides were analyzed by data-dependent acquisition in positive mode using an Orbitrap MS analyzer for a precursor scan at 120,000 FWHM from 400 to 2000 m/z and an ion-trap MS analyzer for MS/MS scans in top speed mode (3 s cycle time) with dynamic exclusion settings (repeat count 1 and exclusion duration 15 s). Higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) was used as a fragmentation method with a normalized collision energy of 32%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Peptide Identification by Nano-UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were reconstituted in solvent A (2% ACN/0.1% FA) and approximately, two µg samples (2/12 µL) were injected on a 50 cm long EASY-Spray C18 column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected to an Ultimate 3000 nanoUPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a 90 min long gradient: 4-26% of solvent B (98% ACN/0.1% FA) in 90 min, 26-95% in 5 min, and 95% of solvent B for 5 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. Mass spectra were acquired on a Q Exactive HF hybrid quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) ranging from m/z 375 to 1700 at a resolution of R=120,000 (at m/z 200) targeting 5x106 ions for a maximum injection time of 80 ms, followed by data-dependent higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentations of precursor ions with a charge state 2+ to 8+, using 45 s dynamic exclusion. The tandem mass spectra of the top 18 precursor ions were acquired with a resolution of R=60,000, targeting 2x105 ions for a maximum injection time of 54 ms, setting quadrupole isolation width to 1.4 Th and normalized collision energy to 33%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nano-UPLC-MS/MS Peptide Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were suspended
in 20 μL of loading buffer and analyzed on an Ultimate 3000
nano UPLC system online coupled to a QExactive-HF mass spectrometer
(Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated on a 75 μm ×
50 cm PepMap C18 column using a 1 and 2 h linear gradient from 5 to
35% buffer B in buffer A at a flow rate of 250 nL/min (∼600
bar). Peptides were introduced into the mass spectrometer using a
nano Easy Spray source (Thermo Scientific). Subsequent isolation and
higher energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) was induced on the 20 most
abundant ions per full MS scan with an accumulation time of 128 ms
and an isolation width of 1.0 Da. All fragmented precursor ions were
actively excluded from repeated selection for 8 s. The mass spectrometry
proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium
via the PRIDE21 (link) partner repository with
the data set identifier PXD008151.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

GST Pull-Down Assay for Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GST pull-down assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was conducted using GST (Proteintech), GST-tagged CC16 (Proteintech), and THP-1 cells. Briefly, 108 differentiated THP-1 cells were treated with 100 ng/mL LPS for 24 h and then homogenized with 1 mL of pull-down lysis buffer. Then 1 mL of cell lysate was mixed with 150 μg of GST or GST-tagged CC16 and separated by glutathione agarose affinity resin, which can capture the GST-tagged protein. Samples were concentrated and separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by silver staining. The samples eluted from glutathione agarose affinity resin and visualized band by silver staining were analyzed by Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid MS (Thermo Scientific) coupled with an Ultimate 3000 nano-UPLC system (Thermo Scientific) in the Proteomics Core Laboratory at Augusta University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Recombinant PKD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
20 μg of recombinant PKD, incubated with and without ATP for 60 min, were precipitated 37 and digested with trypsin (0.4 μg, overnight, 37 °C). The resulting peptide mixture was desalted on C18 Micro Spin Columns (Harvard Apparatus) before being subjected to anti‐pTyr IP (PY99, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) in TBS/1% n‐octyl glucoside (overnight, 4 °C). Beads were eluted with 50% acetonitrile/1% formic acid (10 min, RT). Subsequently, samples were prepared for MS by using C18 ZipTips. The resulting peptide mixture was submitted to high resolution LC‐MS/MS using an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system interfaced with an Orbitrap Q‐Exactive MS via an EASY‐spray (C18, 15 cm) column (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The Q‐Exactive MS was operated in data‐dependent mode selecting the top ten precursors for MS/MS. Protein identifications were obtained from the mascot (Matrix science, version 2.2.2) search engine using UniProt/SwissProt (Homo sapiens, 20202 entries) as a database, allowing up to three missed tryptic cleavages, phosphorylation of STY and oxidation of Met as variable modifications. Peptide abundances were determined using the progenesis qi software package (Nonlinear Dynamics, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Proteomics Using Q-Exactive HF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed on a Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled with an UltiMate 3000 nano UPLC system and an EasySpray source. Peptides were loaded onto an Acclaim PepMap 100 75 µm × 2 cm trap column (Thermo) at 5 µL/min and separated by reverse phased (RP)-HPLC on a nanocapillary column, 75 µm id × 50 cm 2 µm PepMap RSLC C18 column (Thermo). Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid and mobile phase B of 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile. Peptides were eluted into the mass spectrometer at 300 nL/min with each RP-LC run comprising a 90-min gradient from 3% B to 45% B.
The mass spectrometer was set to repetitively scan m/z from 300 to 1,400 (R = 240,000) followed by data-dependent mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (MS/MS) scans on the 20 most abundant ions, minimum automatic gain control (AGC) 1e4, dynamic exclusion with a repeat count of 1, repeat duration of 30 s, and resolution of 15,000. The AGC target value was 3e6 and 1e5, for full and MSn scans, respectively. The MSn injection time was 160 ms. The rejection of unassigned and 1+, 6–8 charge states was set.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomic Analysis of GC B Cells in Itch KO Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry-sorted WT and Itch KO GC B cells from B1-8 mixed chimeras were pelleted and frozen at −80°C prior to proteomics analysis. Proteomics analysis was carried out at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Proteomics Core. Samples were first subject to in-solution digestion: Cell pellets were lysed, solubilized, and digested with the iST kit (PreOmics GmbH, Martinsried, Germany) per manufacturers protocol. The resulting peptides were de-salted, dried by vacuum centrifugation and reconstituted in 0.1% TFA containing iRT peptides (Biognosys Schlieren, Switzerland). Samples were then subject to mass spectrometry acquisition and analysis: Peptides were analyzed on a QExactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermofisher Scientific San Jose, CA) coupled with an Ultimate 3000 nano UPLC system and an EasySpray source using data independent acquisition (DIA). Raw MS data was searched using the direct-DIA mode in Spectronaut software and downstream analyses were performed in Perseus(40 (link)–43 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!