The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using mz apo

1

Aquatic Insect Sampling via Surber Net

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After eDNA sampling but within the same day, traditional aquatic insect collection was conducted using the Surber net survey method. A Surber net of 250-µm mesh size in a 30 × 30-cm quadrat at randomly selected riffle and pool habitats at each site (total collection area: 0.18 m2/reach) was used. Collected invertebrates were placed in 99.5% ethanol and morphologically identified using a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ APO; Leica, Germany) by referring to the identification key for the aquatic insects of Japan (Kawai & Tanida, 2018 ). Because morphological identification was difficult for some aquatic insects, particularly Chironomidae and some Baetidae individuals, population abundance and richness were summarized at the family level.
At the same time as aquatic insect sampling, environmental parameters such as water temperature, electrical conductivity (EC; TOA-DKK CM-21P; Japan), and pH (TOA-DKK HM-20P; Japan) were measured in the field. River water samples of 50 ml were collected from each site to obtain the concentrations of total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) measured in our laboratory using a QuAAtro-2HR (BLTEC Corporation, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whole Mount In Situ Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole mount in situ hybridization and plastic sectioning were performed as previously described [18 (link)]. The antisense riboprobes were as follows: dct and mitfa of medaka [18 (link)] and sox10 of zebrafish [30 (link)]; and sox10a, sox10b and ltk were synthesized from the plasmid described above using SP6 polymerase (Promega) after restriction enzyme digestion: sox10a and sox10b; EcoRI, ltk; XhoI (NEB). For double fluorescent in situ hybridization, the probes were labeled with digoxigenin or fluorescein, and signals were detected with anti-DIG or anti-Fluor POD-conjugated antibodies with using Tyramide Signal Amplification system (Invitrogen). For sectioning, the stained samples were embedded in Technovit 8100 (Heraeus Kulzer) and sectioned at 10μm thickness. Images of stained embryos were taken using Leica MZ APO with attached AxioCam camera (Zeiss) or Zeiss AXIOImager.M2 with attached Orca-frash 4.0 camera. Images of sections were taken using Zeiss AxioPlan2 with an AxioCam camera. Confocal images were obtained with a Zeiss LSM880 laser-scanning confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

New Rovno Amber Pleasing Fungus Beetle Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The new Rovno amber pleasing fungus beetle specimen was purchased from an amber dealer, who obtained the amber mostly in the Varash district of the Rovno region, the most important source of the new Rovno amber taxa in the last few years [30 (link),32 (link),33 (link),38 (link),40 (link),41 (link),45 (link),50 (link),51 (link),52 (link),56 (link),57 (link),58 (link),59 (link)]. It was included in the clear piece of amber, weighting 7.6 g after the primary treatment. The specimen was cut and polished by Anatoly P. Vlaskin (SIZK) for the best visibility of the fossil to the subrectangular piece 10 × 6.5 × 1.6 mm.
Morphological terminology for the body parts of the beetles is following the work of Leschen [2 ].
Photographs were taken at the Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kiev, SIZK) using the microscope Leica Z16 APO stereomicroscope equipped with a Leica DFC 450 camera. Dimensions were measured by 10 × 23 Leica 10450023Widefield Adjustable Eyepiece on Leica MZ APO.
Eleven extant specimens cited in the text were collected by late Alexey Yu. Isaev (Ulyanovsk State University, Russia) and are deposited in the Zoological Museum of Lomonosov State University (Moscow, ZMSU).
The holotype is deposited in collection of Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Geometric Morphometrics of Rhodnius Headshapes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the geometric morphometrics, images of the head of 15 specimens were
captured by means of a stereo microscope Leica MZ APO with an increase of 20x
through the New Capture 2.0 program. Using the CLIC 98 program, eight anatomical
landmarks selected from Gurgel-Gonçalves et al.12 were applied to each image. The analysis of the collected coordinates
was also made using the CLIC program 98 through an orthogonal method of
projections called Procrustes to adjust the figures to common points, i.e.,
translation to a common centroid, scaling to the same centroid size, and
rotation to minimize summed squared distances between the corresponding
landmarks.The discriminant analysis was performed using the major components of Procrustes.
A factorial map was built with the first two principal components (“eigenvalues”
CP1 and CP2) to observe the existence of differences between R.
neglectus
and R. prolixus (Figure 1).
<i>Rhodnius neglectus</i> head showing the eight landmarks<br/>selected for geometric morphometrics. Points 1, 2, 5 and 6 are Type<br/>I (tissue juxtaposition) and points 3, 4, 7 and 8 are Type II<br/>(maximum curvature)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11"><sup>11</sup></xref>.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Taxonomy and Identification of Schizoprymnus Wasps

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This work is mainly based on specimens of Schizoprymnus collected by sweeping net and mostly Malaise traps (MT) set up in China. The key to the Chinese species of the genus Schizoprymnus is updated manually from Chou and Hsu, 1996. The terminology and measurements used follow van Achterberg (1988, 1993). Additional sources for the description of sculpture and setation are from Belokobylskij (1998). The following abbreviations are used: POL—postocellar line; OOL—ocular-ocellar line; OD—maximum diameter of lateral ocellus.
Descriptions and measurements were made under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss Stemi SV 6, ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany). All figures were made by a camera (QImaging, Micropublisher, 3.3 RTV, QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada) attached to a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ APO, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and Auto-Montage Pro version 5.0 software.
Type specimens and other materials are deposited in the Parasitic Hymenoptera Collection of the Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (ZJUH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Parasitic Hymenoptera Collection Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study is based on specimens preserved in the Parasitic Hymenoptera Collection of Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (ZJUH), Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (IZCAS), Shanghai Entomological Museum, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China (SEMS), the Entomological Museum of the China Agricultural University, Beijing, China (CAU) and the Naturalis Biodiversity Center collection, Leiden, The Netherlands (RMNH).
The terminology and measurements used follow van Achterberg (1993) . All descriptions and measurements were made under a Zeiss Stemi 2000-C microscope; figures were made by a digital camera (Q-Imaging, Micropublisher, 3.3 RTV) attached to a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ APO, Germany) and Auto-Montage Pro version 5.0 software. Type specimens are deposited in the Parasitic Hymenoptera Collection of the Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (ZJUH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Coccinellidae Morphological Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The external morphology was observed with a dissecting stereoscope (SteREO Discovery V20, Zeiss and Leica Mz Apo). The following measurements were made with an ocular micrometer: total length, length from apical margin of clypeus to apex of elytra (TL); total width, width across both elytra at widest part (TW=EW); height, from the highest part of the beetle to elytral outer margins (TH); head width in front view, widest part (HW); pronotal length, from the middle of anterior margin to margin of basal foramen (PL); pronotal width at widest part (PW); elytral length, along suture, from the apex to the base including scutellum (EL). Male and female genitalia were dissected, cleared in 10% solution of NaOH by boiling for several minutes, and examined with an Olympus BX51 and Leica compound microscope.
Morphological characters were photographed with digital cameras (AxioCam HRc and Coolsnap–Procf & CRI Micro*Color), connected to the dissecting microscope. The software AxioVision Rel. 4.8 and Image-Pro Plus 5.1 were used to capture images from both cameras, and photos were cleaned up and laid out in plates with Adobe Photoshop CS 8.0.
Coccinellidae morphological terms follow Ślipiński (2007) and Ślipiński and Tomaszewska (2010) . Type specimens designated in the present paper are deposited at SCAU-the Department of Entomology, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, China.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Zebrafish Tumor Transplantation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty-four hpf, wild type zebrafish embryos AB were soaked in embryo medium with 0.2 mM 1-phenyl 2-thiourea and incubated for further 24 h at 28.5 °C. At 48 hpf, embryos were dechorionated and anesthetized with 0.0003% tricaine prior to injection. Anesthetized embryos were positioned on a wet agarose 1% pad. The hindbrain of each embryo was injected with approximately 150–200 cells (ZsGreen-positive cells) using an Eppendorf FemtoJet microinjector, under the observation by stereoscope (MZ APO, Leica). After transplantation, embryos were incubated for 4 h at 32 °C and checked for the presence of fluorescent cells in the correct site. Then embryos were incubated at 32 °C in fresh medium for the following days. For the treatments, screened embryos were transferred in a 48-well plate with 1 mM compound concentration prior to the incubation at 32 °C. Five days post-fertilization (dpf, 3 days after injection), images of the tumors were captured and the relative integrated density, obtained by the product of the fluorescence intensity and the area of the tumor mass, was calculated as the ratio between the final and the initial tumor integrated density using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Ceramic Crown Damages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All crowns were examined for occlusal surface damage associated with the fatigue scar and its surrounding areas using polarized light stereomicroscopy (Leica MZ-APO, Wetzlar, Germany). Failures were designated as chip-off fracture or bulk-fracture through the crown. Crowns that did not present fracture were evaluated for subsurface damage using a sectioning technique [40 (link)] rather than a residual strength measurement using the monotonic load to failure test [41 (link)–43 (link)]. The authors believe that more information can be obtained by identifying surface and subsurface structural changes than from very high load fracture patterns or reduction in initial strength. Therefore the crowns were embedded in the clear epoxy resin, cross-sectioned buccolingually along the direction of the sliding contact and slightly away from the center of the fatigue scar, using a water cooled low speed saw with a diamond wafering blade (Isomet, Buehler, Lake Buff, IL). Cross-sectioned crowns were polished up to the center of the fatigue scar using a sequence of diamond grinding discs of 15, 9, 6, and 3 microns (Apex, Buehler), and analyzed using polarized light stereomicroscopy for the presence of cracks and damages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microscopic Analysis of Fish Scales

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sampled scale, preserved between two microscope slides stuck together by adhesive tape, was observed. Photographs were acquired through a stereomicroscope MZ APO (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Moticam 10+ camera (Motic, Barcelona, Spain) using different magnifications according to the scale size. For M. surmuletus, the magnification was X6.3 (235 pixels/mm), for D. rerio, the magnification was X25 (932 pixels/mm), for all other species the magnification was X10 (371 pixels/mm). All scales were examined keeping the anterior portion leftwards and the dorsal portion upwards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!