The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using anti epcam pe

1

Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each 3.75 mL of blood, red blood cell (RBC) lysis was first performed using 1× Pharm Lyse solution (BD Biosciences). The RBC-depleted sample was then incubated with 4 tests of FITC-anti-CD45 (eBiosciences; clone HI30) for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by incubation with anti- EpCAM magnetic beads (Illumina)16 (link) for 30 min at 4 °C. PE-anti-EpCAM (BD Biosciences; clone EBA-1) was then added for 30 min at 4 °C prior to immunomagnetic isolation using the Illumina MagSweeper16 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each 3.75 mL of blood, red blood cell (RBC) lysis was first performed using 1× Pharm Lyse solution (BD Biosciences). The RBC-depleted sample was then incubated with 4 tests of FITC-anti-CD45 (eBiosciences; clone HI30) for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by incubation with anti- EpCAM magnetic beads (Illumina)16 (link) for 30 min at 4 °C. PE-anti-EpCAM (BD Biosciences; clone EBA-1) was then added for 30 min at 4 °C prior to immunomagnetic isolation using the Illumina MagSweeper16 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Immunophenotyping of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell-surface antigens, staining was carried out in PBS with 3% FCS. For intracellular antigens, staining was carried out on cells fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Staining was done in PBS with 3% FCS and 0.5% saponin (Sigma). Cells were stained at a concentration of 2.5 × 106 cells/ml with anti-KDR- APC (R&D Systems; 1:10) and anti-PDGFRA– PE (R&D Systems; 1:20), anti-SIRPA–PE-Cy7 (clone SE5A5; BioLegend; 1:500), anti-Podoplanin-PE (BioLegend, 1:200), anti-CD90-APC (BD Pharmingen, 1:2000), anti-PDGFRβ-PE (BD Pharmingen, 1:200), anti-EPCAM-PE (BD Pharmingen, 1:200), anti-CD31-PE (BD Pharmingen, 1:10), anti-CTNT (clone 13-11; Thermo NeoMarkers; 1:400), goat anti-mouse IgG–APC(BD; 1:200). Cells assayed for Aldefluor (STEMCELL Technologies) were prepared based on manufacturers instructions. Incubation with the Aldefluor reagent was 45 minutes. Stained cells were analyzed on an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For FACS, the cells were sorted at a concentration of 106 cells/ml in IMDM/5% FCS using a FACSAriaTMII (BD Biosciences) cell sorter (SickKids-UHN Flow Cytometry Facility). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of ALDH1high and CD10+/EpCAM+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were exfoliated from culture dish by accutase (Innovative Cell Technology) and filtered through 40μm cell strainers (Greiner) to obtain single cells. The ALDH1high cells were isolated from MDA-MB157 and MDA-MB468 cells by ALDEFLUOR assay kit (Stem Cell Technology) or AldeRed ALDH detection assay kit (MERCK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells (2×106) were incubated with the substrate for ALDH1 (5μL substrate/mL medium) for 30 min at 37°C. As a negative control for the ALDEFLUOR assay and AldeRed assay, cells were incubated with ALDH1 inhibitor, diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB). The ALDH1high cells were sorted by cell sorter (FACS AriaII, BD Bioscience) by taking the negative control into consideration. The analysis of CD10/EpCAM positive cells from MDA-MB157 and MDA-MB468 cells. Suspended MDA-MB468 cells (1×106) were incubated with anti-CD10 (APC) (BD Bioscience) and anti-EpCAM (PE) (BD Bioscience) for 1hr on ice, after which the sample was washed with fresh FACS buffer (2%FBS in 1×PBS (-)). For this experiments, cells were analyzed using a FACS Calibur (BD Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Single-Cell Epithelial Isolation and Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cells from patient P1 were stained with Sytox Blue viability dye (S34857, Life Technologies) and processed on a FACS Aria I instrument. Cells from P2–P16 were stained with anti-EPCAM-PE (347198, BD Biosciences; 1:50 dilution in ice-cold PBS containing 2% FBS) for 30 min with gentle rotation at 4 °C. Mouse lung single cells were similarly stained but with a cocktail of antibodies (1:250 each) against CD45-PE/Cy7 (103114, BioLegend), ICAM2-A647 (A15452, Life Technologies), EPCAM-BV421 (118225, BioLegend) and ECAD-A488 (53-3249-80, eBioscience). Stained cells were then washed, filtered using 40 μm filters, stained with Sytox Blue (human) or Sytox Green (mouse) and processed on a FACS Aria I instrument (gating strategies for epithelial cell sorting are shown in Supplementary Figs. 1 and 4 for human and mouse cells, respectively). Doublets and dead cells were eliminated, and viable (Sytox-negative) epithelial singlets were collected in PBS containing 2% FBS. Cells were washed again to eliminate ambient RNA, and a sample was taken for counting by Trypan Blue exclusion before loading on 10X Genomics Chromium microfluidic chips.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Acoustophoresis-based CTC Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were analyzed with a BD FACS CantoII
(BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) or imaged by the Amnis ImageStream
Mk II image flow cytometer (Millipore, Burlington, MA) and analyzed
by Ideas software. For CTC identification and WBC exclusion, acoustophoresis
isolated cells were stained with a fluorescent antibody cocktail;
anti-EpCAM-PE (BD biosciences) and anti-panCytokeratin (CK)-Alexa
Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher, Gothenburg Sweden), identifying CTCs, and
anti-CD45-APC (BD biosciences) and anti-CD66b-Alexa Fluor 647 (BD
biosciences) to distinguish WBCs. DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) identified
intact cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparametric CTC Identification Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were analyzed with a BD FACS CantoII or imaged by the image flow cytometer Amnis ImageStream Mk II (Millipore, Burlington, MA) and analyzed by the Ideas software. For CTC identification and WBC exclusion, acoustophoresis isolated cells were stained with a fluorescent antibody cocktail; anti-EpCAM-PE (BD biosciences) and anti-panCytokeratin (CK)-Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher, Gothenburg Sweden), identifying CTCs, and anti-CD45-APC (BD biosciences) and antiCD66b-Alexa Fluor 647 (BD biosciences) to distinguish WBCs. DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) identified intact cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Immunophenotyping of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell-surface antigens, staining was carried out in PBS with 3% FCS. For intracellular antigens, staining was carried out on cells fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Staining was done in PBS with 3% FCS and 0.5% saponin (Sigma). Cells were stained at a concentration of 2.5 × 106 cells/ml with anti-KDR- APC (R&D Systems; 1:10) and anti-PDGFRA– PE (R&D Systems; 1:20), anti-SIRPA–PE-Cy7 (clone SE5A5; BioLegend; 1:500), anti-Podoplanin-PE (BioLegend, 1:200), anti-CD90-APC (BD Pharmingen, 1:2000), anti-PDGFRβ-PE (BD Pharmingen, 1:200), anti-EPCAM-PE (BD Pharmingen, 1:200), anti-CD31-PE (BD Pharmingen, 1:10), anti-CTNT (clone 13-11; Thermo NeoMarkers; 1:400), goat anti-mouse IgG–APC(BD; 1:200). Cells assayed for Aldefluor (STEMCELL Technologies) were prepared based on manufacturers instructions. Incubation with the Aldefluor reagent was 45 minutes. Stained cells were analyzed on an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For FACS, the cells were sorted at a concentration of 106 cells/ml in IMDM/5% FCS using a FACSAriaTMII (BD Biosciences) cell sorter (SickKids-UHN Flow Cytometry Facility). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!