The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using cp bu new

1

Western Blot Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell lysates were prepared using PRO-PREP™ protein extraction solution (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea) in the presence of a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Set V; Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany). The protein content of each cell lysate was quantified using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay system (Bio-Rad Laboratories), then lysates containing equivalent quantities of protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (EMD Millipore Corporation, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% nonfat dry milk (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) in TBS-T (TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20) and hybridized with the indicated primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Membranes were then washed three times with TBS-T and incubated with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using Clarity™ Western ECL Blotting Substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories), followed by exposure to X-ray film (CP-BU new; AGFA, Mortsel, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were lysed on ice for 10 min with RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycolate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM EGTA) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340; Sigma-Aldrich) and centrifuged with 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatants were mixed with 4×SDS sample buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl at pH 6.8, 8% SDS, 40% glycerol, and 0.04% bromophenol blue) and 10 mM DTT (0281-25G; Amresco). Mixtures were boiled for 5 min. The protein samples were loaded in SDS polyacrylamide gels (3% stacking gel and 4–10% separating gel), electrophoresed, and transferred to Protran BA85 nitrocellulose membranes (10401196; GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The membranes were blocked with blocking solution (5% nonfat milk in 0.1% Tween 20 in TBS or 5% bovine serum albumin in 0.1% Tween 20 in TBS) for 2 h, incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution for 16 h at 4°C, washed four times with TBST (0.1% Tween 20 in TBS), incubated with secondary antibodies in blocking solution for 30 min, and washed again. To detect the signals of secondary antibodies, the ECL reagent (ABfrontier, LF-QC0101) and x-ray films (Agfa, CP-BU NEW) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All protein fractions were assayed using the Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad) and then boiled in Laemmli sample buffer, resolved by SDS–PAGE, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare) and analysed by western blotting. Dot-blot filter retardation assays were performed in a 96-well BioDot microfiltration unit (Bio-Rad) using a 0.22 µm cellulose acetate membrane (Dutscher). After treatment, the samples were resuspended in 2% SDS, loaded onto the membrane, filtered and washed twice with 0.1% SDS. The list of primary antibodies is in Supplementary file 6. Secondary horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (anti-mouse and anti-rabbit) were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories; anti-rat antibodies were purchased from Bethyl Laboratories. The membranes were incubated with commercially available (Pierce) or homemade enhanced chemiluminescence substrate as described in (Bertolin et al., 2016 (link)). Chemiluminescence signals were captured on film (CP-BU new, Agfa Healthcare), developed using CURIX 60 developer (Agfa Healthcare) and quantified with ImageJ software (NIH). The relative abundance of specific bands of interest was calculated by normalising it towards the abundance of loading controls and indicated in each graph.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of BAT Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BAT and primary brown adipocytes were lysed using tissue extraction reagent I (Invitrogen, FNN0071) or NP40 cell lysis buffer (Invitrogen, FNN0021) containing protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 04693132001) and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma-Aldrich, P7626). Soluble proteins (10 μg per lane) were separated on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel and blotted on a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, 1060004). Membranes were incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody at RT for 1 h in 5% skim milk (Carl Roth, T145.2) with TBST, visualized using an chemiluminescence detection system (NLRP3: GeneDepot, W3680-010; CASP1: Biomax, BWD0100; UCP1 and ACTB: Biomax, BWP0200), and exposed to film (Agfa, CP-BU NEW). To determine the available linear range of western blots, the exposure time was collected in every experiment.
Anti-UCP1 (1:10,000 dilution) antibody was purchased from Abcam (ab10983). Anti-NLRP3 (1:1,000 dilution) and anti-CASP1 (1:2,000 dilution) antibodies were purchased from Adipogen (AG-20B-0014-C100, AG-20B-0042-C100). Anti-ACTB (1:20,000 dilution) antibody was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (A5441). The signal intensities of protein bands were quantified with the ImageJ software (NIH) and normalized using the intensity of the loading control ACTB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genomic DNA Extraction and Southern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To extract genomic DNA, Xcg cells grown on TSA medium were subcultured into TSB medium (casein peptone 17 g, soya peptone 3 g, sodium chloride 5 g, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 2.5 g, glucose 2.5 g in 1 liter distilled water) in a 28°C shaking incubator for 24 h. Bacterial DNA was extracted from 1 ml of cells grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.8 to 1.0 using a commercial genomic DNA extraction kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc., Seongnam, Korea) and the protocol for Gram-negative bacteria. The concentration of extracted DNA was estimated using a spectrophotometer (BioDrop Duo, Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge, UK).
For Southern blot analysis, genomic DNA of Xcg was digested with the restriction enzyme BamHI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Electrophoretic separation and transfer to nylon membranes were performed as described (Sambrook et al., 1989 ). For DNA hybridization, a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled avrBs3 gene probe was used; this probe was comprised of a 3.3-kb internal BamHI fragment of avrBs3 cloned into pBlueScript, as described previously (Park et al., 2008 (link)), using a commercial protocol for DIG-labeled probes and membrane hybridization (Roche Diagnostics, Mortsel, Belgium). Detection of hybridization was performed using an anti-DIG antibody (Roche Diagnostics) and subsequent exposure to an X-ray film (Agfa CP-BU new).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Kinase Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples obtained from kinase tests or total protein fractions were boiled in Laemli sample buffer, resolved by SDS–PAGE, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare) and analysed by western blotting. The following primary antibodies were used: monoclonal mouse anti-AURKA clone 35C1, 1:20 (ref. 68 (link)) or rabbit anti-AURKA pThr288 1:2,000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA5-14904); and anti-Histone H3 pSer10, 1:10,000 (Merck Millipore, 06-570) or rat anti-TUBA1A clone YL1/2, 1:5,000 (EMD Millipore, MAB1864). Secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies anti-mouse or -rabbit were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (315-035-045 and 111-035-144), while anti-rat were purchased from Bethyl Laboratories (A110-105P). Membranes were incubated with commercially available (Pierce) or home-made enhanced chemiluminescence substrate composed of 100 mM Tris (pH 8.6), 13 mg ml−1 coumaric acid (Sigma), 44 mg ml−1 luminol (Sigma) and 3% hydrogen peroxide (Sigma). Chemiluminescence signals were captured on a film (CP-BU new, Agfa Healthcare) with a CURIX 60 developer (Agfa Healthcare). Uncropped scans of western blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of WT1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins from the fresh frozen sarcoma tissue were loaded onto each well of the gel, separated by SDS-PAGE, and then transferred onto a membrane (CP-BU new, Agfa). After blocking nonspecific binding, the membrane was immunoblotted with the anti-WT1 mouse monoclonal antibody WLM 04 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), followed by incubation with the appropriate secondary antibody conjugation with alkaline phosphatase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extracts from cultured cells or cell culture supernatants were quantified and electrophoresed as previously described [22 (link)]. Western blotting was performed using the appropriated dilutions of primary and secondary antibodies (usually 1:2000) (Table 1). Detection of α-tubulin with a specific antibody (Sigma) was used as a protein-loading control.
Colorimetric determinations to quantify total protein amounts in cell extracts and culture supernatants were performed with a Plate Reader Axis UVM340 (Biochrom). Western blotting images were obtained by developing exposed films (CP-BU New, Agfa) for 10–30 s (α-tubulin and HA fusion proteins), 1 min (DLK1, DLK2, NOTCH1, and NOTCH2 proteins), or 5 min (NOTCH3 and NOTCH4 proteins) with the Pierce ECL Plus Western blotting substrate kit (Thermo Scientific) in a Curix 60 developing apparatus (AGFA). Films were scanned with an HP Officejet Pro 8600 scanner and signals of the different proteins were quantified using the QuantityOne 4.6.5. (Basic) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!