The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using nicotine tartrate

1

Chronic Nicotine Administration via Osmotic Pumps

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(-)-Nicotine tartrate (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH.) was dissolved in 0.9% saline. Nicotine was administered subcutaneously via osmotic minipumps (Alzet model 2002, Cupertino, CA) at a dose of 18 mg/kg/d for 14 days. This dose, reported as freebase weight and based off of previous work [16 (link), 21 (link)–23 (link)], corresponds to plasma levels of ~0.3 μM [24 (link)], a concentration similar to that observed in human smokers consuming an average of 17 cigarettes a day (plasma levels between 0.06 and 0.31 μM) [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pharmacological Reagents and Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nicotine tartrate (MP Biomedicals, LLC, Solon, OH, USA) was dissolved in 0.9% saline and the pH adjusted to 7.4. Nicotine doses were calculated based on free base weight. NAC (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 27 mg/mL sodium hydroxide in saline to physiological pH immediately before injection. Vivo-morpholinos (Gene Tools, LLC, Philomath, OR, USA) were dissolved in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NACl, and 2.7 mM KCl) and stored at room temperature. The GLT-1 antisense (i.e., AS) vivo-morpholino sequence is 5’-TGTTGGCACCCTCGGTTGATGCCAT-3’ and the reverse sequence was used as a control (i.e., CTRL; Reissner et al., 2015 (link), 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pharmacological Evaluation of Nicotinic Agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Drugs used in this study included nicotine tartrate (MP Biomedicals, LLC, Solon, OH), RO5263397 (synthesized at Research Triangle Institute, purity > 98%) and mecamylamine hydrochloride (Sigma). nicotine tartrate was dissolved in 0.9% physiological saline, and the pH was adjusted to 7.2–7.4 prior to injection. RO5263397 was dissolved in a mixture of 1 part absolute ethanol, 1 part Emulphor-620 (Rhodia) and 18 parts physiologic saline.36 (link) The dose of RO5263397 (intraperitoneally, i.p.; 5.6 mg/kg) used in these experiments was selected based on our previous findings in which there was no effect on general locomotor activity.30 (link),37 (link) Mecamylamine hydrochloride was dissolved in saline and administered i.p. (1.5 mg/kg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Psychostimulant and Nicotine Injection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
d-Amphetamine sulfate salt at 0.1 and 0.3 mg/mL (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO) and (−)-nicotine tartrate at 0.4 mg/mL (MP Biomedicals; Irvine, CA) were dissolved in 0.9% saline and injected at a volume of 1 mL of solution/kg of body weight. d-Amphetamine was injected intraperitoneally (IP) using a 15-minute injection-to-placement interval (IPI) and nicotine was injected subcutaneously (SC) using a 5-minute IPI. The IPI is defined as the length of time between the injection and the start of the session. Rats were returned to the home cage after each injection. Before the session, rats were transported to the experimental room in a transport cart and placed in the conditioning chamber within 1-minute of the session starting. Nicotine was brought to a pH of 7.0 ± 0.2 with a dilute NaOH solution. d-Amphetamine doses are reported in salt form while nicotine doses are in base form — per field standards. All doses, IPIs, and routes of administration were based on published research (Huynh et al., 2020; Palmatier et al., 2005 (link); Slezak et al., 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Vivo Nicotine Consumption Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in vivo administration, −(−) nicotine tartrate (MP Biomedicals, Cat# 0215355491) was added to tap water to create a concentration of free base nicotine at 200 μg per milliliter. Dilutions also contained 2% saccharin sodium salt hydrate (Oakwood Chemical, Cat# 098769). Control animals received only 2% saccharin. Nicotine dilutions were given in light protective bottles and made fresh 3 times a week. After 3 weeks of treatment mice were sacrificed and their tissues were analyzed. Mice were 3 months of age at the start of treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nicotine and Estrogen Receptor Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(-)Nicotine tartrate (MP Biomedicals) was dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline, and pH was adjusted to 7.2–7.4 using 1 m NaOH. E2 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and diluted to 3 μg/0.1 ml in sesame oil (Sigma-Aldrich). E1 was purchased from Sigma and was diluted to 10 μg/0.1 ml in 3 μg/0.1 ml E2 in sesame oil (Sigma-Aldrich). 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3(1H,4H)-dione (DNQX) was purchased from Tocris Biotechne and diluted to a stock concentration of 20 mm in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Before recordings, DNQX was diluted to a working concentration of 20 μm in recording aCSF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dose-Dependent Effects of Amphetamine and Nicotine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
d-Amphetamine sulfate at 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.0 mg/mL (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in 0.9% saline and injected intraperitoneally using a 15-minute injection-to-placement interval. The injection-to-placement interval was considered the time from injection to the start of the experimental session. d-Amphetamine (AMP) doses are reported in salt form. (−)-Nicotine tartrate at 0.03, 0.06, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/mL (MP Biomedicals; Irvine, CA) was dissolved in 0.9% saline and injected subcutaneously using a 5-minute injection-to-placement interval. Nicotine (NIC) doses are reported in base form per field standards. NIC solution was brought to a pH of 7.0 ± 0.2 using a dilute NaOH solution. In all cases, injections were given at 1 mL of solution/kg of body weight from the home cage. Before the session, and after their last injection, rats were moved the short distance to the experimental room using a transport cart. Doses, injection-to-placement intervals, and routes of administration were based on published research (Barrett et al., 2020 (link); Huynh et al., 2020 (link); Slezak et al., 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nicotine and Mecamylamine Injection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(−)-Nicotine tartrate (MP Biomedical, Solon, OH) was dissolved in isotonic saline, and the pH was adjusted to 7 with NaOH solution. Mecamylamine hydrochloride (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in isotonic saline. All injections were given subcutaneously (s.c.) into the flank at a volume of 1 ml/kg. All doses are expressed as those of the base.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nicotine and Galantamine Injection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(−)-Nicotine tartrate (MP Biomedical, Solon, OH) was dissolved in isotonic saline, and the pH was adjusted to 7 with NaOH solution. Galantamine hydrobromide (TCI America, Portland, OR) was dissolved in isotonic saline. All doses are expressed as those of the base. Injections were given s.c. into the flank at a volume of 1 ml/kg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anesthetic Preparation and Administration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nicotine tartrate (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) was dissolved in 0.9% sterile saline and the pH was adjusted to 7.2. Ketamine (Ketavet, St. Joseph, MO), xylazine (Akorn; Lake Forest, IL), cefazolin, meloxicam, and heparin (all from Henry Schein, Melville, NY) were administered at doses listed previously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!