The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sensimix sybr no rox

Manufactured by Meridian Bioscience
Sourced in United States

SensiMix SYBR No-ROX is a master mix solution for real-time PCR applications. It contains all the necessary components, including SYBR Green I dye, for efficient DNA amplification and detection without the need for a reference dye.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using sensimix sybr no rox

1

Quantitative RT-PCR for Srrm2 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using 10 U/μl of Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, 18064-022), 50 ng of random primers (Promega, C118A), 0.5 mM dNTPs (NEB, N0447L), 5 mM RNAseOUT (Invitrogen, 10777-019) in a 20 μl solution with 10 mM DTT and Superscript buffer, according with the manufacturer's instructions. RNA-DNA hybrids were removed with 2 U of RNase H (NEB, M0297S). The synthesised DNA was diluted 1:4 and 1 μl was used for qRT-PCR, using SensiMix™ SYBR® No-ROX (Meridian Bioscience, QT650-05), 250 nM of each primer in a final volume of 20 μl. The primers sequences are reported from 5′ to 3′: Srrm2 Exon 11 FW AGTCTCTCGTAGAAGCCGGT, Srrm2 Exon 11 RV CTTCTGCGTCTTGGTGGAGT, Actb FW TCTTTGCAGCTCCTTCGTTG and Actb RV ACGATGGAGGGGAATACAGC. Srrm2 expression was measured from three biological replicates per condition and were assessed according to the 2–ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)), and normalised to Actb. The relative RNA expression for each condition was estimated by calculating the ΔCT average per replicate. The mean and standard deviation (s.d.) were then determined from the replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis of PC12 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was prepared from the differentiated PC12 cells using Trizol reagent (15596026, InvitrogenTM, USA). The RNA integrity and concentration were measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer. All RNA samples with an OD260/OD280 between 1.8 and 2.0 were used for quantitative real-time PCR. Total RNA was reverse-transcribed with the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (1708890, Bio-Rad, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed in the LightCycler ® 480 System (Roche) using the SensiMix™ SYBR® No-ROX (QT650-20, Meridian Bioscience, USA) according to the instructions provided. The run PCR program was as follows: 1 cycle at 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 15 s. Relative gene expression levels were calculated according to the 2−∆∆CT method. The mRNA levels were quantified using GAPDH as a housekeeping gene for normalization. Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Isolation and Real-Time RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared from cultured cells using the ReliaPrep™ RNA Cell Miniprep System kit from Promega according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Two micrograms of RNA was used for reverse transcription with Rotor-Gene SYBR Green RT-PCR(QIAGEN) or The SensiMix™ SYBR® No-ROX(BioLine) protocols for Real TimeOne-Step RT-PCR using the Real Time Rotor-GeneRG-3000™ light cycler from Corbett Research using primers listed in Supplementary Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Total RNA Extraction and RT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared from cultured cells using the ReliaPrep™ RNA Cell Miniprep System kit from Promega according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Two micrograms of RNA was used for reverse transcription with Rotor-Gene SYBR Green RT-PCR(QIAGEN) or The SensiMix™ SYBR® No-ROX(BioLine) protocols for Real TimeOne-Step RT-PCR using the Real Time Rotor-GeneRG-3000™ light cycler from Corbett Research using primers listed in Supplementary Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and RT-qPCR Analysis of Total RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared from cultured cells using the ReliaPrep™ RNA Cell Miniprep System kit from Promega according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Two micrograms of RNA was used for reverse transcription with Rotor-Gene SYBR Green RT-PCR (QIAGEN) or The SensiMix™ SYBR® No-ROX (BioLine) protocols for Real TimeOne-Step RT-PCR using the Real Time Rotor-GeneRG-3000™ light cycler from Corbett Research using primers listed in Supplementary Table IV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gene Expression Analysis in Murine Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extraction and genomic DNA removal were performed using the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (Qiagen). First-strand cDNA was generated from total RNA using iScript™ Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Expression of Gapdh (Forward: TACCCCCAATGTGTCCGTC; Reverse: AAGAGTGGGAGTTGCTGTTGAAG), Gata2 (Forward: GAATGGACAGAACCGGCC; Reverse: AGGTGGTGGTTGTCGTCTGA), Epx (Forward: TCACTTGACCGAGTGTCACC; Reverse: CTCCTGACTAACCGCTCTGC), Ear1 (Forward: AATGCTGTTGGTGTGTGTGGAAAT; Reverse: CACTGGATACATGGGACTGTCCTG) and Ear2 (Forward: TCTGTAACATCACCAGTCGGAGGA; Reverse: CACTGGAGCTAAAATGTCCCATCC) (all from Integrated DNA Technologies) were analysed using 2× SensiMix SYBR No-ROX (Bioline) on a CFX384 Real-Time PCR detection System (Bio-Rad). Quantitative gene expression data were normalized to the expression levels of the housekeeping gene Gapdh by means of the 2−ΔCq method multiplied by 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gene Expression Analysis in Murine Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extraction and genomic DNA removal were performed using the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (Qiagen). First-strand cDNA was generated from total RNA using iScript™ Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Expression of Gapdh (Forward: TACCCCCAATGTGTCCGTC; Reverse: AAGAGTGGGAGTTGCTGTTGAAG), Gata2 (Forward: GAATGGACAGAACCGGCC; Reverse: AGGTGGTGGTTGTCGTCTGA), Epx (Forward: TCACTTGACCGAGTGTCACC; Reverse: CTCCTGACTAACCGCTCTGC), Ear1 (Forward: AATGCTGTTGGTGTGTGTGGAAAT; Reverse: CACTGGATACATGGGACTGTCCTG) and Ear2 (Forward: TCTGTAACATCACCAGTCGGAGGA; Reverse: CACTGGAGCTAAAATGTCCCATCC) (all from Integrated DNA Technologies) were analysed using 2× SensiMix SYBR No-ROX (Bioline) on a CFX384 Real-Time PCR detection System (Bio-Rad). Quantitative gene expression data were normalized to the expression levels of the housekeeping gene Gapdh by means of the 2−ΔCq method multiplied by 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

FFPE Mouse Brain RNA Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from FFPE mouse brain tissues using the ReliaPrep™ FFPE Total RNA Miniprep System Kit (Promega) and following manufacturers’ instructions. The concentration of RNA was measured using a NanoPhotometer P300 (Implen). Samples were used for cDNA synthesis using the Superscript™ III First‐Strand Synthesis System for RT‐PCR (Invitrogen), following manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real‐time PCR was performed in a LightCycler® 480 Multiwell Plate 96 (Roche) using SensiMix SYBR No‐Rox (Bioline), in triplicates, as previously described (Althubiti et al., 2016). For the primers used, see Table S4. All primers were supplied by Eurofins Scientific. A melting curve was used to prove the specificity of the primers at the end of the PCR run. Quantification was done with the ∆∆Ct method. Results were analysed on Microsoft Excel, and graphs plotted using GraphPad Prism 7.0 Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using QIAzol Lysis Reagent and isolated using RNAeasy mini kit (both from QIAGEN). cDNA synthesis was performed using the ProtoScript II First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (NEB). Expression levels of target genes were determined by RT-PCR using SensiMix SYBR No-Rox (Bioline) with the primers shown in Supplementary Table 1. Reactions were run on an MX3000P real-time thermal cycler (Agilent Technologies) and Ct values determined using MxPro qPCR software. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2-ΔCt method after normalising to the expression levels of the housekeeping gene, Gapdh. Fold change levels were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method after normalising to the untreated control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Denitrification Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) of nirK, nirS and 16S rRNA genes was carried out using a Lightcycler 480 II (Roche, Applied Science). Standard curves were prepared from serial dilutions of linearized plasmid with the nirK gene from Alcaligenes faecalis LMG 1229T, nirS gene from Paracoccus sp. R-24615 and 16S rRNA gene from Flavobacterium swingsii LMG 25510, containing between 109 to 101 target gene copies calculated directly from the concentration of the extracted plasmid. DNA concentrations were determined using the Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo, Scientific). The qPCR assays were carried out in a 20 μl reaction volume composed of SensiMix SYBR No-ROX (Bioline GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany), 0.4 μM of each primer, 2.5 μl of template DNA (10 ng/μl), 0.1 mg BSA (not used in the nirS assay) and sterilized milliQ water. The same primers as for pyrosequencing were used and the thermal protocol can be found in S2 Table. All reactions per sample were performed in triplicate. Agarose gel electrophoresis, melting curve analysis, cloning and sequencing of the obtained amplicons indicated that the amplification was specific. PCR inhibition was determined by spiking sediment DNA with a known amount of standard DNA and corrected for according to Zaprasis et al. [65 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!