The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rotor gene q software

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Germany, Australia, United States

The Rotor-Gene Q software is a real-time PCR analysis software designed for use with the Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR cycler. The software provides tools for data acquisition, analysis, and reporting of real-time PCR experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

51 protocols using rotor gene q software

1

Quantifying Bone-Related Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The difference between the mRNA levels of
important bone-related genes in stem cells was
analyzed using real-time RT-PCR. Total RNA was
extracted and random hexamer primed cDNA synthesis
was carried out using Revert Aid first strand
cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, Burlington, Canada).
The cDNAs were used for 40 cycle PCR in a
Rotor-gene Q real-time analyzer (Corbett, Sydney,
Australia). Real-time RT-PCR was performed using
Maxima™ SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master
Mix (Fermentas) followed by melting curve analysis
to confirm PCR specificity. Each reaction was
repeated twice and threshold cycle average was
used for data analysis by Rotor-gene Q software
(Corbett, Sydney, Australia). Genes and related
specific primers are illustrated in table 1. Relative
expression was quantified using ΔΔCt method.
Target genes were normalized against HPRT and
calibrated to iPSCs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Neural Induction Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the 7th and 14th days of neural induction, MAPK3, β–III–tubulin, NSE, and MAP2 were used to quantify the difference among mRNA levels of key neural genes. Total RNA was extracted from cultured hADSCs using Trizol reagent (Gibco) and cDNA was synthesized using Revert Aid first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea). Real-time PCR was carried out through Maxima TM SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (GeneAll) followed by melting curve analysis to confirm PCR specificity. Each reaction was repeated three times and an average threshold cycle was applied for analysis by Rotor-gene Q software (Corbett, Australia). The PCR primers picked out are listed in Table 1. Target genes were normalized against HPRT1 and calibrated to TCPS.

Primers used in RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR analysis.

Table 1
GeneForward(F)Reverse(R)Product size (bp)
NSEF: GGAGAACAGTGAAGCCTTGGR: GGTCAAATGGGTCCTCAATG238
MAP-2F: AGTTCCAGCAGCGTGATGR: CATTCTCTCTTCAGCCTTCTC95
β–III–tubulinF: GATCGGAGCCAAGTTCTGR: GTCCATCGTCCCAGGTTC178
MAPK3F: ATGTCATCGGCATCCGAGACR: GGATCTGGTAGAGGAAGTAGCA198
HPRT1F:CCTGGCGTCGTGATTAGTGR: TCAGTCCTGTCCATAATTAGTCC125
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Osteoblast Transcriptome Analysis on Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific bone-related
genes of transcript mRNA from MG63 osteoblast-like cells cultivated
on the synthesized nanocomposite with a concentration of 10 μg/mL
were tested by real-time qRT-PCR analysis. Full RNA was isolated,
and indiscriminate hexamer-primed cDNA production was executed on
them. A RevertAid first strand cDNA union pack was used. In a 40-cycle
PCR using a Rotor-gene Q analyzer, the cDNA was used as a template
base. To determine the real-time PCR, the Maxima SYBR green/ROX qPCR
master mix was used. It was further followed by softening bend investigation
to verify PCR specificity.39 (link),40 (link) In Rotor-Gene Q software
(Corbett), limit cycle normal was used for calculation and all of
the experiments were repeated twice. ΔCt analysis was used to calculate the relative gene expression.
Each target gene’s comparative expression levels were normalized
besides the general housekeeping gene’s Ct value. The reverse and forward primers of the handpicked
genes are listed in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed and total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA quality and concentration were estimated using denatured gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry respectively. About 500 ng of the total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a reverse transcription kit (Fermentas, USA) with random hexamers for target genes. cDNA synthesis of miRNAs was undertaken using the Reverse Transcription System Kit (Promega, USA) with miR-specific stem-loop primers (Table 2). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in triplicate using a 40 cycle PCR in Rotor-gene Q real-time analyzer (Corbett, Sydney, Australia). Each real-time PCR reaction contained 5 μl of 2×SYBR Premix Dimer EraserTM (TaKaRa, Japan), 3 pmol of forward and reverse primers respectively, 1 μl template of cDNA and dH2O up to the final volume of 10 μl, followed by a melting curve analysis to confirm PCR specificity. The average threshold cycle was used for data analysis by Rotor-gene Q software (Corbett, Sydney, Australia). Gene expression levels were normalized against the expression of β-actin and Snord 47(U47) as internal controls for miRNA expression. The 2 −ΔΔCtmethod was employed to estimate the relative expression level of each gene. All reactions were run in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Gene Expression Analysis of CD34+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evaluating the gene expressions of CD34+ cells was performed 13 days after treatment by real-time PCR analysis, where Trizol was used to extract total RNA, and then the synthesis of cDNA was carried out by M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase and oligo primers. Gene quantification and real-time PCR quantification (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed using a standard SYBR Green PCR kit by Rotor-Gene 6000 instrument. The details of qRT-PCR analysis are described in the previous study. Rotor-Gene Q software (Corbett) was used for data analysis of the threshold cycle average, and the data were normalized to endogenous controls (GAPDH) and calibrated to untreated cultured cells as control. Finally, the relative mRNA expression levels were measured according to the ΔCT method.15 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Real-Time PCR Analysis of Cell Seeded Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Herein, real-time PCR seems to be very applicable to detect the changes about the gene expression of the seeded cell on the scaffolds. The assay was performed at 3rd and 7th days of cell culture. For this aim, the total RNA of the cells were extracted by TRIzol reagent (Sigma, cat. no T9424) and their associated cDNA was synthesized accordance with an optimum protocol. For the cDNA production, M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (RT) and Random Hexamer were bought from Fermentas (cat. no 28025013 and N8080127, respectively). For the real-time PCR reactions (Rotor-gene Q software, Corbett), 0.5 µL of cDNA was used for each test sample and the parameters of temperature and time, were set as 94 °C for 3 minutes for the annealing temperature, the conditions of 35 cycles (94 °C for 30 seconds, 62 °C for 45 seconds, 72 °C for 45 seconds) and the extension time of 7-10 minutes at 72 °C. The relative gene expression values were obtained by the comparative ∆∆Ct method.34 The employed real-time PCR master mix was afforded from Fermentas (cat. no 4309155). Moreover, the primer sequences were collected in Table 1. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as the housekeeping control and the other 2 genes of VEGF-A and TGF-β1 were the experimental genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of miRNA and Target mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The quality and concentration of total RNA were subsequently estimated using denatured gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometer, respectively. According to previous study miR could be amplified with stem-loop realtime PCR using specific stem-loop primers (30 (link)). Expression level of the corresponding predicted mRNA targets (Insr and Vamp2) to the selected miR was also validated by real-time PCR using gene specific primers. The threshold cycle average was used for data analysis by Rotor-gene Q software (Corbett, Australia). Genes and related specific primers are presented in the Table 1. Insr and Vamp2 expressions were normalized against the expression of β-actin. Snord-6 (U6) was also selected as internal control for miR expression. All PCRs were performed in triplicates and run in at least 3 independent experiments. The 2−ΔΔCtalgorithm was employed to evaluate the relative expression level of each gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SARS-CoV-2 Detection via RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens were aliquoted and frozen at −80°C on the day of collection until processing at the Sunnybrook Health Sciences research microbiology laboratory (Toronto, Canada). RNA extractions were performed using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using the Luna Universal Probe One-Step RT-qPCR Kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) was performed to detect the 5’ untranslated region and envelope (E) gene of SARS-CoV-2, with RNaseP as internal control. Cycle thresholds (Cts) were determined using Rotor-Gene Q software (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands); results where all targets had Cts <40 were reported as positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SYBR Green RT-PCR for Horsens Strain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A SYBR green real-time RT-PCR assay specific for the Horsens strain was designed. The primers were designed to target ORF3, spanning the recombination breakpoint resulting in a 251 bp amplicon. The real-time RT-PCR was run on a Rotor-Gene Q machine (QIAGEN) in a total volume of 25 µL using the Qiagen OneStep RT-PCR kit with 2 µL extracted RNA, 1.5 µM of each primer and 2× SYBR green (SYBR Green I Nucleic Acid Gel Stain 10,000×, CAMBREX) final concentrations. The amplification profile was: 50 °C, 30 min; 95 °C, 15 min; 45 cycles (94 °C, 15 s; 60 °C, 15 s; 72 °C, 60 s); 72 °C, 5 min; 50 °C, 1 min, immediately followed by a melting point analysis, ramping from 50 to 99 °C, rising 1 °C per step, holding 5 s at each temperature increase. The fluorescence signal was measured at 72 °C during each PCR cycle and at each temperature increase during melting analysis. The fluorescent signals were analyzed with Rotor-Gene Q software v. 2.3.1 (QIAGEN), setting the NTC threshold at 10% and cycle threshold at 0.01.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative gene expression analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Toal RNA from the treated cells were isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and synthesized to cDNA using MuLV Reverse Transcriptase. Real-time PCR were performed on a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR cycler (Qiagen, Shanghai, China) using SYBR-green PCR master mix kits as described previously [17 (link), 19 (link)]. The primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) and the oligonucleotide sequences were as follows: CHOP: 5’-CCACCACACCTGAAAGCAGAA-3’(forward primer), 5’-GGTGCCCCCAATTTCATCT-3’(reverse primer); GRP78: 5’-ACATGGACCTG TTCCGCTCTA-3’ (forward primer), 5’-TGGCTCCTTGCCATTGAAGA-3’ (reverse primer); β-actin: ’-CGGGGACCTGACTGACTACC-3’ (forward primer), 5’-AGGA AGGCTGGAAGAGTGC-3’ (reverse primer). The data were analyzed using the Rotor- Gene Q software (version 1.7, Qiagen), and then relative mRNA levels were calculated by the 2–△△Ct method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!