Endnote

Manufactured by Thomson Reuters

Sourced in United States, Canada

EndNote is a reference management software that allows users to collect, organize, and format bibliographic citations and references. It provides a platform to manage research sources, create formatted bibliographies, and integrate citations into manuscripts and documents.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Scopus, by Elsevier (2 mentions) Pubmed, by Elsevier (2 mentions) Sciencedirect, by Elsevier (2 mentions) Endnote x9, by Thomson Reuters (1 mentions) Cochrane library, by Elsevier (1 mentions) Dissertations theses global, by Elsevier (1 mentions) Endnote 5 x7, by Thomson Reuters (1 mentions) Embase, by Elsevier (1 mentions) Endnote x7, by Thomson Reuters (1 mentions) Sas 9.4 for windows, by SAS Institute (1 mentions)

108 protocols using endnote

Systematic Literature Search Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

A search strategy composed of keywords and free terms was used to search for studies in the electronic databases Pubmed, Web of Science, Lilacs, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane, as well as the grey literature search through Google Scholar and OpenGrey (Table S1). After that, a reference manager (EndNote, version X9, Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, USA) was used to exclude duplicate citations.
The first stage of the study selection was carried out by reading the titles and abstracts. The remaining articles were read in full to verify eligibility. From this stage, the papers selected for this review were defined, and a manual search was carried out in the references in order to find other eligible articles. Two independent authors performed the search and selection of studies, and a third reviewer evaluated the data in cases of disagreement.

Né Y.G., Souza-Monteiro D., Frazão D.R., Alvarenga M.O., Aragão W.A., Fagundes N.F., de Souza-Rodrigues R.D, & Lima R.R. (2022). Treatment for dental erosion: a systematic review of in vitro studies. PeerJ, 10, e13864.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Weekend and Weekday Hospital Admission Patterns

Cited 1 time

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Using MEDLINE, CINAHL, HMIC, EMBASE, EThOS, CPCI and the Cochrane Library without language restriction, we limited the search to year 2000 onwards to ensure that evidence reasonably reflected contemporary health organisation and practice. Our iterative search strategy combined terms relating to ‘weekend/weekday’ or ‘out-of-hours’ with terms relating to ‘hospital admissions’. Terminology used in MEDLINE is shown in online supplementary appendix 1 of the published protocol.15 (link)
Records were imported into EndNote (Thomson Reuters) and de-duplicated. The initial search in April 2015 was updated with a MEDLINE search in May 2016 and again in November 2017 as our screening of the initial search identified few (1/28) relevant publications uniquely in other databases. We used reference chaining for completeness. Additional searches were undertaken specifically for framework synthesis, described in the companion paper.

Chen Y.F., Armoiry X., Higenbottam C., Cowley N., Basra R., Watson S.I., Tarrant C., Boyal A., Sutton E., Wu C.W., Aldridge C.P., Gosling A., Lilford R, & Bion J. (2019). Magnitude and modifiers of the weekend effect in hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 9(6), e025764.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Systematic Review of Fecal Incontinence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The results of the search in the literature were combined, and duplicate studies were removed, using End-Note (version X7, Thomson Reuters, 2015) software. In the second phase, during the primary screening, unrelated studies were eliminated. The abstracts of the extracted references were evaluated by 2 independent reviewers and recorded in the data extraction form and, if rejected, the reason would be mentioned. In case of disagreement between the 2 reviewers, the third reviewer studied the data and solved the disagreement by discussing. The extracted data included information regarding study design, sample characteristics, and control group (age, sex, and mechanism of FI), number of samples evaluated, outcome (FI scores and anal sphincter pressures), and probable biases. When the outcomes and studied measures were reported at various times, the last evaluation time was included in the study.

Sarveazad A., Babahajian A., Amini N., Shamseddin J, & Yousefifard M. (2019). Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 10(5), 419-431.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Estimating Unpublished Non-COVID-19 Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

We aimed at estimating the number of non-COVID-19 studies that could have been published during the pandemic period. First, using the LOESS method described above, we extrapolated the publication dynamics observed from January 1st 2019 to the start of the pandemic which was set on the 30th January 2020, following the official declaration of the World Health Organization [24 ]. Based on this trend, we then simulated the number of non-COVID-19 studies that could have been published, from 31st January 2020 to 31st December 2020, if the pandemic had not occurred. We then subtracted the number of non-COVID-19 studies that were actually published to obtain the final, simulated number of unpublished non-COVID-19 studies.
All analyses were performed with Endnote (Endnote X9, Thomson Reuters), NoteExpress (Version 3.2, Beijing Aegean Software Co., Ltd.,) and R (version 3.2.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing) software. Data are available upon reasonable request.

Raynaud M., Goutaudier V., Louis K., Al-Awadhi S., Dubourg Q., Truchot A., Brousse R., Saleh N., Giarraputo A., Debiais C., Demir Z., Certain A., Tacafred F., Cortes-Garcia E., Yanes S., Dagobert J., Naser S., Robin B., Bailly É., Jouven X., Reese P.P, & Loupy A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on publication dynamics and non-COVID-19 research production. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21, 255.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Systematic Review of DBS for PD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Two reviewers (ZGT and QZ) independently conducted the initial search. Retrieved literatures were imported into ENDNOTE (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA, USA), with duplication discarded. Unrelated literatures were excluded after careful scanning of titles and abstracts. Full-text articles of the remaining literatures were acquired to identify eligibility. Any discrepancy was resolved by discussion or decided by a third reviewer.
Published RCTs were included by meeting the following criteria: 1) population: patients with advanced PD were responsive to levodopa; 2) intervention: GPi DBS or STN DBS (either bilateral or unilateral); 3) comparison: STN DBS or GPi DBS (either bilateral or unilateral); 4) one or more of the following outcomes: scores of unified PD rating scale III (UPDRS-III), scores of Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), LED, neurocognitive status, and QOL. Literatures were excluded for the following reasons: 1) subjects in each team were <10; 2) maximum follow-up time was <6 months; and (3) data from conference abstracts or literatures that could not be extracted.

Tan Z.G., Zhou Q., Huang T, & Jiang Y. (2016). Efficacies of globus pallidus stimulation and subthalamic nucleus stimulation for advanced Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 11, 777-786.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Systematic Review Screening Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Screening of search results was performed using Covidence systematic review software (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia). Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of studies based on the inclusion criteria. A third author assessed and resolved disagreements on study selection. All irrelevant titles were excluded. For studies that met eligibility criteria, full text articles were obtained and managed using EndNote (version X7·5 2016 Thomson Reuters), a reference management software.

Colt S., Garcia-Casal M.N., Peña-Rosas J.P., Finkelstein J.L., Rayco-Solon P., Weise Prinzo Z.C, & Mehta S. (2017). Transmission of Zika virus through breast milk and other breastfeeding-related bodily-fluids: A systematic review. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 11(4), e0005528.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Systematic Search of Relevant Research Databases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

We identified published studies from BIOSIS Previews (ISI Web of Knowledge), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ClinicalTrials. gov, Cochrane Library (Wiley Interscience), Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest), EMBASE (EMBASE. com), PubMed (National Library of Medicine), ScienceDirect (Elsevier) and Scopus (Elsevier) from inception to January 2017. There were no language restrictions. To optimise search criteria, we developed a detailed and comprehensive search strategy with an information specialist (MM) for each electronic database (online supplementary eMethods). EndNote V.X7 was used for deduplication (EndNote, Thomson Reuters).

Bowen R.C., Zhou A.X., Bondalapati S., Lawyer T.W., Snow K.B., Evans P.R., Bardsley T., McFarland M., Kliethermes M., Shi D., Mamalis C.A., Greene T., Rudnisky C.J, & Ambati B.K. (2018). Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of intracameral cefuroxime, moxifloxacin and vancomycin at the end of cataract surgery: a meta-analysis. The British journal of ophthalmology, 102(9), 1268-1276.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Systematic Review Search Strategy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

A MEDLINE search strategy was designed and underwent peer review by an independent information professional.20 (link) Database searches were conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid). Unpublished or ongoing clinical trials were identified by searching ClinicalTrials.gov. The final search strategy is presented in Appendix 1 (available at canjsurg.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cjs.019721/tab-related-content). The literature was searched from database inception until June 10, 2021. All retrieved records were imported into Endnote (X9, Thomson Reuters) and deduplicated.

Johnson G., Ziegler J., Helewa R., Askin N., Rabbani R, & Abou-Setta A.M. (2023). Preoperative oral fluoroquinolone antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery to prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 66(1), E21-E31.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Systematic Literature Review Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

To identify pertinent articles, the titles and abstracts of those retrieved were exported to Endnote (version X9; Thomson Reuters), wherein duplicates were removed. The remaining titles and abstracts were assessed by two investigators (D.K./Y.J.L.) independently for eligibility, and for the eligible ones, the relevant full-text articles were retrieved. Then, the same two investigators independently assessed those articles for final eligibility. Eligibility classification discrepancies were resolved through discussion, consensus, or, when needed, third-party (Y.K.K.) adjudication.

Lee Y.J., Ha A., Kang D., Shim S.R., Jeoung J.W., Park K.H, & Kim Y.K. (2023). Comparative efficacies of 13 surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma in children: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 109(4), 953-962.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Systematic Review of Hypertension Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The selected studies were investigated more accurately. Those conducted as review or those whose sample had not been chosen from the older adults with hypertension or the studies repeated with previous data were removed from the meta-analysis. Eventually, 76 studies entered the third stage, qualitative assessment. Each article was separately reviewed by two reviewers. If the article was rejected by them, they expressed the reason, and if there was any controversy between the reviewers, the article was reviewed by a third referee whose opinion was considered as the final decision. Duplicate publication and multiple publications from the same population were removed using citation management software EndNote (version X7, for Windows, Thomson Reuters).

Kazeminia M., Daneshkhah A., Jalali R., Vaisi-Raygani A., Salari N, & Mohammadi M. (2020). The Effect of Exercise on the Older Adult's Blood Pressure Suffering Hypertension: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Clinical Trial Studies. International Journal of Hypertension, 2020, 2786120.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!