The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Li 1600

Manufactured by LI COR
Sourced in United States

The LI-1600 is a portable environmental monitoring device designed for research applications. It is capable of measuring and recording various environmental parameters, such as temperature, humidity, and solar radiation. The LI-1600 is compact, lightweight, and easy to use, making it suitable for field studies and environmental data collection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using li 1600

1

Leaf Physiological Responses to Infestation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chlorophyll content, net photosynthesis, transpiration rate, and leave angle of six shoots of each genotype were measured on the fifth to tenth terminal of mature leaves from the base of the shoot at 30 d after infestation. Chlorophyll content (ChlSPAD value) was estimated using a portable chlorophyll meter (CCM-200, Opti-Sciences, Tyngsboro, MA, USA). Light-saturated net photosynthesis was measured with a portable infrared gas analyzer (LI-6200, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Transpiration rate was measured with a portable porometer (LI-1600, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Leaf angle was measured using an Accupar LP-80 ceptometer (Decagon Devices, NE Hopkins Court, Pullman, WA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Acclimation of Plant Water Relations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the 10-week treatment period, both 24 and 48 h after irrigation, maximum leaf stomatal conductance to water vapour (gL) and transpiration rate (EL) were measured between 1200 and 1400 hours on leaves of at least one plant per module per experimental group and species using a steady-state porometer (LI-1600, LICor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). At the same time, midday diurnal leaf water potential (Ψmidday) was estimated using a portable pressure chamber (3005 Plant Water Status Console, Soilmoisture Equipment Corp.).
In order to quantify eventual acclimation of water relation parameters in terms of leaf water potential at the turgor loss point (Ψtlp), osmotic potential at full turgor (π0) and bulk modulus of elasticity (ɛmax), leaf water potential isotherms of leaves of at least one plant per module per experimental group were determined from pressure–volume (P–V) curves (Tyree and Hammel 1972 (link)). Measurements were performed before starting the treatment and repeated at the end of the 10-week period, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Grapevine Drought Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The physiological response to drought was evaluated over 30 days. To evaluate the effect of water stress thermal images of the grape leaf canopies were elaborated using the software InfReC Analyzer (NS9500LT) (Nippon Avionics Co., Yokohama, Japan). Stomatal conductance was estimated from two different thermal indices: crop water stress index (CSWI) (Eq. 1) [121 (link)] and thermal index (Ig) (Eq. 2) [122 (link)].
CWSI=TcanopyTwetTdryTwet IG=TdryTcanopyTcanopyTwet where Tcanopy (°C) was the temperature deduced from the thermal images of six sun-exposed mature leaves per vine, Tdry (°C) and Twet (°C) were the temperatures detected on the cardboard “reference surfaces”. Stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration were measured with a steady state porometer (Licor Li-1600) in the third experimental year.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Leaf Transpiration and Stomatal Conductance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) of fifth fully expanded leaf from the base of stressed and unstressed plants were determined using a portable steady-state porometer LI-1600 (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) under the following conditions: temperature 22–25 °C; 16 h/8 h (light/dark) photoperiod; relative humidity 80%; and 250 mol m−2 s−1 intensity light. The porometer consists of a cuvette with a broadleaf aperture (2 cm2), which permits the precise measurements of water loss by transpiration (µg cm−2 s−1) and stomatal resistance (s cm−1). Measurements were carried out by attaching the cuvette to the leaf surfaces and simultaneously registered humidity (%) conditions and temperature (°C). Three biological replicates were conducted at each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Leaf Water Dynamics and Hydraulic Conductance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf water potential (Ψ), transpiration rate (Ε), stomatal conductance (gs) and leaf temperature (Tl) were measured on the newest fully developed mature leaves of six different individuals from sun-exposed terminal branches. Using the pressure-bomb technique (PMS, Albany, OR, USA), leaf water potential was measured twice during the day, i.e., at predawn (Ψp) and midday (Ψm). Transpiration rate, gs and Tl were measured using steady state porometer (Li1600, LI-COR Lincoln, NE, USA). Seasonal measurements of Ψp were obtained before sunrise, while the measurements of Ψm, E, and gs were obtained on clear sunny days at around solar noon (12:00–14:30 h), approximately 10–15 days intervals. The presented values, for each of the parameters, are means of six replications per studied shrub.
Leaf hydraulic conductance (KLeaf) was calculating according to Ohm’s law following the formula: KLeaf=E(ΨsoilΨLeaf)=E(ΨpΨm)
It has been assumed that Ψsoil is in equilibrium with Ψp and the lowest diurnal Ψleaf is equal to Ψm [66 ,67 (link),99 (link)]. However, sometimes the first assumption may lead to overestimation of Kplant [100 (link)]. Additionally, values of KLeaf reflect the capacity of evergreen and deciduous plants, grown under ambient conditions, for water exploitation during a period of soil drying.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Leaf Xylem pH, Stomatal Resistance, and Water Use Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH value of leaf xylem or root xylem sap was determined immediately after collection using digital pH meter (Model 60, JENCO, USA). Stomatal resistance of the top fully expanded leaves was measured at 10:00–12:00 am using a steady state porometer (Li-1600, LiCor Inc, NE, USA).
Daily water dissipation by transpiration and the evaporation from soil surface was determined by weighing every day. At the beginning of this measurement, the plant weight per pot was determined to avoid prejudicing the amount of water use per pot. The cumulative amount of water dissipation by transpiration per pot d−1 during the whole experiment was the total water dissipation by transpiration of the potted plants. The water use efficiency of biomass production (WUE) was determined for each potted plant by dividing the total biomass production (above- plus belowground biomass) by cumulative water use throughout the test period (i.e. the total water dissipation by transpiration).
The water potential of top third fully expanded leaf were measured by pressure chamber (Model: 3005, Soil Moisture Equipment Co. U.S.A) as described above. The soil water content per pot was measured by HH2 Moisture Meter (Cambridge, England).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Stomatal Conductance Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stomatal conductance was measured on 19 April (1 d after the first spray treatment application) in 2012 and on 21 and 28 March in 2013 (3 and 10 days after the first treatment) in 2 fully expanded leaves located on opposite sides of each plant (fifth to seventh basipetally located leaves). Measurements were made between 1:00 and 3:00 p.m. with a steady-state porometer (LI-1600, LI-COR Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Leaf Physiological Measurements in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flag leaf area in cm2 was measured using Area Meter (L1-Cor, Model L1 3000A.).
Specific leaf weight (SLW) in g cm−2 was calculated according to Pearce et al. (1968) using the formula: SLW=leafdryweight(g)leafarea(cm2)
Relative water content (RWC %) was calculated based on Gonzalez and Gonzalez (2001) using the formula: RWC=Fw-DwTw-Dw where: FW = the sample fresh weight, TW = the turgid weight & DW = the dry weight.
Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence was measured using chlorophyll fluorometer (OS-30, opti sciences, inc. The USA) to calculate the maximum quantum yield of photo-system ll (PSll) by the formula of Maxwell and Johnson (2000) (link) as follow: FvFm=Fm-FoFm where: Fv/Fm = the maximal quantum efficiency of PSll (MQE), Fm = the maximal chlorophyll fluorescence, and Fo = minimum chlorophyll fluorescence (in the dark).
Leaf temperature (°C): During the mid-day time, and in the absence of cloud cover, a portable steady state the promoter (LI-COR model LI- 1600) was used to measure leaf temperature on a central portion of fully extended flag leaves from three randomly selected plants in each plot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Stomatal Conductance Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A LI-1600 (LI-COR Biosciences) porometer was used to take measurements of the stomatal conductance (mmol H 2 O m 2 s -1 ) under laboratory conditions (17-20 °C, 25-40 % HR), not more than two hours after the samples collection. This parameter was used to estimate stomatal opening under different accumulations of particulate matter but similar conditions of cavitation. Leaf temperature remained relatively homogeneous during the G S measurements (18.4-21.2 °C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Measuring Plant Transpiration and Stomatal Conductance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transpiration and stomatal conductance of plants (n = 5 of each species) was measured midday between 1100 and 1300 h in the greenhouse using a portable gas exchange system (Li-1600, Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Three mature and healthy leaves were selected on each plant, which were treated as subsamples, and were measured repeatedly when plants were 'well-watered' (Ψstem ≥ -0.6 MPa), under drought-stress (Ψstem < -1.0 MPa), and 1 d and 2 d after re-watering (Ψstem > -0.6 MPa). When one of the selected leaves showed severe signs of necrosis or leaf dieback in response to drought stress, it was discarded from the analysis. Ψstem was determined on other mature leaves within 15 to 30 min after completion of gas exchange measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!