The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

31 protocols using cd11c n418

1

Isolation of Intestinal Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To isolate immune cells from the Lamina propria, we adapted protocols available in the literature, leaving out a gradient step to avoid the possible selective loss of viable cells [21 (link)]. Briefly, the small intestine was resected, washed and cut into small pieces. The pieces were placed for 20 minutes in a solution containing 0.2 mg/ml collagenase and DNAse (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The solution was vigorously vortexed and then filtered through a 100 μm strainer. Cells were washed in medium and counted in trypan blue. Fluorescence was measured on a FACSCanto-II flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). At least 30,000 cells were collected in list mode. Debris, dead cells, and doublets were gated out by staining with Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 506 (eBioscience, Frankfurt/Main, Germany staining. Lymphocytes/leucocytes were gated out according to scatter characteristics. Finally, the frequency of DC was determined in the remaining population by MHCII (M5/114.15.2 BD-Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany), CD11c (N418), and CD103 (2E7, eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Profiling Listeria-Associated Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies specific for CD16/CD32 (93), CD45 (30-F11), CD11c (N418), CD11b (M1/70), Ly6G (1A8-Ly6g), B220 (RA3-6B2), MHC-II (M5/114.15.2), CD3 (145-2C11), F4/80 (BM8), CD19 (eBio1D3) from eBioscience; Ly6C (HK1.4) and CD103 (2E7) from BioLegend were used. Data were acquired using an iCyt Synergy and analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star). The percentage of Listeria-associated (GFP+) cells in each population was determined by using cells from mice infected with L. monocytogenes SD2001 as a negative gating control in each experiment as described previously (18 (link),19 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against mouse CD45 (30-F11), CD3 (145-2C11), CD8 (53-6.7), B220 (RA3-6B2), CD11b (M1/70), CD11c (N418), Gr1 (RB6-8C5), TER119 (TER119), NKp46 (29A1.4), CD4 (RM4-5), Thy1.2 (53-2.1), SCA1 (D7), CCR6 (29-2L17), c-Kit (2B8), IL-7Rα (A7R34), IL-22 (1H8PWSR), IL-17A (TC11-18H10.1), IFNγ (XMG1.2), T-bet (4B10), RORγt (2B2), EpCAM (G8.8) were purchased from eBioscience, BD Pharmingen, or Biolegend. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated with IL-23 (50 ng/ml) in the presence of brefeldin A (10 µg/ml) for 4 hours at 37°C. Cell sorting and flow cytometry were performed using an Influx cell sorter and a LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), respectively. Data were analyzed using FlowJo vX software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Murine Immune Cell Profiling by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were released from culture plates using TrypLE and were stained after Fc-block (Invitrogen) with a panel of directly fluorochrome-conjugated mAbs against the following murine molecules (clone; source): Axl (R&D; Minneapolis, MN); CD4 (L3T4; eBioscience; San Diego, CA); CD8 (CD8b.2; Biolegend; San Diego, CA); CD11b (M1/70; eBioscience); CD11c (N418; eBioscience); CD19 (MCA1439F; AB Serotec); CD44 (IM7; eBioscience); CD45 (30-F11; BD); CD80 (16-10A1; BioLegend); CD206 (C068C2; BioLegend); Ly6C (AL-21; BD); Ly6G (1A8; BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ); Mertk (R&D). Experiments were performed on an LSR II flow cytometer and data were analyzed as previously described (25 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Analysis of Mucosal Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from the colon and small intestine lamina propria were isolated as previously described8 (link). The cells were stimulated and stained as previously described8 (link). The following antibodies were used for surface staining of: CD3 (145-2C11, eBioscience); CD4 (L3T4, BD Difco); CD11b (M1/70, eBioscience); CD11c (N418, eBioscience); F4/80 (BM8, eBioscience); CD103 (M290, BD Difco); major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II (M5/114.15.2, BD Dico); TCR-γδ (eBioGL3, eBioscience); and NKp46 (29A1.4, eBioscience). Intracellular cytokine staining was performed using IL-17A (TC11-18H10, BD Difco) and IL-22 (IL-22JOP, eBioscience) antibodies. All antibodies were used at final concentration of 1 μg/ml. The cells were analyzed using a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Leukocytes were gated using forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC), and within the leukocyte gates, the innate immune cells were identified as macrophages (MHCII+F4/80+CD103CD11b+CD11c) or dendritic cells (MHCII+F4/80 CD103+/−CD11bCD11c+). For the lymphoid compartment, the leukocytes were gated using FSC and SSC. Within the lymphocyte gate, the populations were identified as TH17 cells (CD3+CD4+IL-17+IL-22+), TH22 cells (CD3+CD4+ IL-17IL-22+), NKp46+ ILCs (including ILC3 and NK cells; CD3CD4NKp46+), LTi cells (CD3CD4+NKp46), γδ T cells (CD3+CD4TCRγδ+) or CD3CD4NKp46 cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multicolor Flow Cytometry for Myeloid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was performed by incubation of lung single-cell suspension (or whole blood for reference of cell identification) with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. The following panel of antibodies for myeloid cell markers was used: CD45 (30-F11; BioLegend); CD11c (N418, eBioscience); CD11b (M1/70; BD Biosciences); F4/80 (CI:A3-1; BioLegend); CD103 (2E7; BioLegend); MHCII (M5/114.15.2; BioLegend); Ly6G (RB6-8C5; BioLegend); Ly6C (AL-21, Becton Dickinson Biosciences). A CD4 antibody (GK1.5, BioLegend) was used for T cell identification. After incubation 4 ml of FWB was added to lung cell suspension or 4 ml BD LyseFix solution to whole blood and samples were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm at 4°C for 5 min. Cells were resuspended in FWB and analyzed with a seven-channel CyAn ADP flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Prior to analysis the addition of AccuCheck counting beads (Invitrogen) enabled cell counts to be calculated. Data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Treestar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunophenotyping of Spleen and LN Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens and popliteal LNs were harvested at indicated times and prepared as previously described57 (link). Briefly, tissues were fixed in periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde buffer and placed in 30% sucrose in PBS. Tissues were then embedded in OCT medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences), frozen in dry-ice cooled isopentane and sections were cut on a cryostat (Leica Microsystems). Sections were blocked in 5% sera and stained with the following antibodies to: CD11b (M1/70, eBioscience), CD11c (N418, eBioscience), B220 (RA3–6B2, eBioscience), CD64 (polyclonal, R&D Systems), MHC II (I-A/I-E, M5/114.15.2, eBioscience), followed by the relevant secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores. Images were acquired using Leica SP8 microscope and analyzed using Imaris software (Bitplane).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunophenotyping of Spleen and LN Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens and popliteal LNs were harvested at indicated times and prepared as previously described57 (link). Briefly, tissues were fixed in periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde buffer and placed in 30% sucrose in PBS. Tissues were then embedded in OCT medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences), frozen in dry-ice cooled isopentane and sections were cut on a cryostat (Leica Microsystems). Sections were blocked in 5% sera and stained with the following antibodies to: CD11b (M1/70, eBioscience), CD11c (N418, eBioscience), B220 (RA3–6B2, eBioscience), CD64 (polyclonal, R&D Systems), MHC II (I-A/I-E, M5/114.15.2, eBioscience), followed by the relevant secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores. Images were acquired using Leica SP8 microscope and analyzed using Imaris software (Bitplane).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used for flow cytometry included B220 (RA3-6B2, Biolegend), CD3 (clone 145-2C11, BD Biosciences), CD4 (RM4-5, Biolegend), CD8 (53-6.7, Biolegend), CD11b (M1/70, eBioscience), CD11c (N418, eBioscience), CD38 (90, eBioscience), CD44 (IM7, eBioscience), F4/80 (BM8, eBioscience), GL7 (GL7, BD Biosciences), Gr-1 (RB6, eBioscience), IgM (eB121-15F9, eBioscience), IL-17A (TC11-18H10, BD Biosciences), IL-17F (18F10, eBioscience), and IL-17RA (PAJ-17R, eBioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In vivo T cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vivo labeling of T cells with fluorescent antibodies was performed as previously described (Turner et al., 2014). Briefly, mice were administered, PE- or Alexa 647-conjugated anti-CD90.2 (anti-Thy1.2; clone 53-2.1, BioLegend), or PE-conjugated anti-CD45.2 antibody (clone 104, Biolegend), intravenously, and 7–10 minutes later lungs were perfused, dissected and digested in RPMI1640 medium with collagenase D, DNAse and Trypsin inhibitor for 1 hour at 37°C. Mediastinal lymph nodes and spleen were dissected and manually disrupted to generate single cell suspensions. Cell suspensions were stained with fluorescent-conjugated antibodies for CD4 (clones RM4-5, BD Biosciences, and GK1.5, eBioscience), CD8 (clone 53-6.7, BioLegend), CD11a (clone M17/4, BioLegend),CD11b (M1/70 eBioscience), CD11c (N418, eBioscience), CD25 (PC61.5, eBioscience), CD45 (30-F11, BioLegend), CD69 (clone H1.2F3, eBioscience), CD86 (GL-1, Biolegend), CD103 (clone 2E7, eBioscience) and Anti-Mouse MHC Class II (I-A/I-E) (clone M5/114.15.2, eBioscience) was performed according to manufacturers’ protocol. Stained cells were analyzed using the BD LSRII flow cytometer and flow-jo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR). Absolute cell numbers were determined by flow cytometry using CountBright Absolute Counting Beads (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!