The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rq dnase

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States

RQ DNase is a recombinant DNase I enzyme used to remove genomic DNA contamination from RNA preparations. It is an effective tool for eliminating DNA from RNA samples prior to downstream applications such as RT-PCR and Northern blotting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using rq dnase

1

Transcriptome Analysis of roxS Mutant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains CCB281 (wild-type) and CCB282 ΔroxS (S3 Table) were used for transcriptome analysis. Cells were grown in 2×YT medium to OD600 ∼0.6. 20 mL aliquots were centrifuged and RNA was prepared by the glass beads method [60 (link)], with an additional RQ DNase (Promega) step (0.01 units/μL, 37°C for 30 mins) after the second phenol extraction. RNA concentrations were measured and duplicate samples sent to Roche/Nimblegen for labeling and analysis on second-generation (T2) tiling arrays according to the BaSysBio protocol described in [28 (link)]. The data were quantile normalized and moderated t-test p-values were computed for the difference between the ΔroxS and WT genetic backgrounds (R package limma [62 (link)]). The p-values were converted to q-values to account for multiple testing via control of the False Discovery Rate (FDR) (R package fdrtool [63 (link)]). The cut-off value chosen for significant effects was ≥ 2, with a Q-value of ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cerebellar Protein Extraction and Immunodetection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen cerebellar cortex was homogenized in a series of extraction buffers intermixed with pelleting of insoluble material by ultracentrifugation at 135,000×g for 30 min. The extraction buffers included RIPA buffer (5 ml buffer per gram tissue; 50 mM Tris pH 7.3, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % SDS, 0.5 % sodium deoxycholate, 1 % NP-40 with protease inhibitors), myelin floatation buffer (5 ml buffer per gram tissue; 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 30 % sucrose with protease inhibitors), DNAse buffer containing (Promega, 1 unit of RQ DNAse per 10 mg tissue in 1× reaction buffer, incubated at 37° for 30 min) and sarkosyl buffer (5 ml buffer per gram tissue with sonication; 1 % sarkosyl, 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10 % sucrose with protease inhibitors). The remaining insoluble material was pelleted and sonicated in SDS buffer (1 ml per gram tissue; 2 % SDS, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6). Five μl of SDS lysates was dot blotted onto nitrocellulose using a Biorad Bio-Dot apparatus and washed with 300 μl of SDS buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol. Dot blots were blocked with 5 % milk, blotted with RANT-specific antibodies and visualized by film using enhanced chemiluminescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Synthesis of Labeled tRNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Labeled tRNAs were prepared by in vitro transcription of PCR templates containing an integrated T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence. The template for E. coli tRNATrp was made by PCR amplification of chromosomal DNA from strain MG1655 with the primers CC2556 and CC2557 (CC2591 for tRNATrp without CCA) (table S1). The oligos for M. tuberculosis tRNAs are given in table S1. The T7 RNA polymerase in vitro transcription reactions were performed in 25-μl total volume, with a 5-μl nucleotide mix of 2.5 mM ATP, 2.5 mM CTP, 2.5 mM GTP, and 60 μM UTP and 2 to 4 μl of 10 mCi ml−1 of radiolabeled UTP [α-P32]. Template (0.1 to 0.2 μg) was used per reaction with 1.5 μl of rRNasin (40 U ml−1) (Promega), 5 μl of 5× optimized transcription buffer (Promega), 2 μl of T7 RNA polymerase (20 U ml−1), and 2.5 μl of 100 mM DTT. Template DNA was removed by the addition of 2 μl of RQ DNase (1 U ml−1) (Promega). Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by G50 spin columns (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, in a final volume of 30 μl. For E. coli tRNATrp, the transcript reaction was gel-purified on a denaturing 5% acrylamide gel and eluted in 0.3 M sodium acetate for 4 hours overnight at 4°C. The supernatant was removed, ethanol-precipitated, and resuspended in 20 to 30 μl of nuclease-free H2O.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transcriptional analysis of Acanthamoeba zinc transporters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from A. castellanii infected with C. gattii WT and Δzip1 after 3 and 24 h of interaction using Trizol® reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. RNA integrity was assessed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and RNA concentration was measured by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific). The samples were treated with RQ DNase (Promega) to purify RNA. Reverse transcription and cDNA synthesis were performed with ImProm-II Reverse transcriptase (Promega) using oligo-dT. The relative expression of genes identified as zinc transporters by the conserved domain (PF02535 and PF01545) of their coding products in A. castellanii were determined by qRT-PCR (StepOne Real-Time PCR System) with an initial step of 95°C for 10 min, followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 55°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 60 s. All experiments were performed in biological triplicate and each cDNA sample was also analyzed in technical triplicate for each primer pair. A melting curve analysis was performed at the end of the reaction to confirm the presence of a single PCR product. The results were processed according to the 2-ΔCt method (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008 (link)) and relative transcript levels were normalized with actin transcript levels. The primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Arabidopsis Embryo RNA Extraction and Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were isolated (at bent cotyledon stage) from developing siliques of Arabidopsis39 (link). Frozen (−80°C) samples were homogenized for 1 min at 30 s−1 (Retsch mixer mill MM301; Retsch, Haan, Germany) in 2 mL tubes containing one tungsten bead (2.5 mm diameter). Total RNA was extracted from homogenized tissues by using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Three micrograms of RQ DNase (Promega, Madison, WI) digested total RNA was used to prepare cDNA by reverse transcription with M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega) and Gene expression was determined by quantitative real-time PCR (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) using LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche Diagnostics). Expression levels of NPF5.5 (F: GTACATTCTACTCGGTTCAATCACA and R: ACTCCCACGTTTAATAGAACCA) were normalized to expression levels of the CLATHRIN (At4g24550 F, AGCATACACTGCGTGCAAAG and R: TCGCCTGTGTCACATATCTC) and ACTIN (At3g18780.1 F: CTGAGGCTGATGATATTCAACC and R: ACACTGGGAAAAACAGCCC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific primers were designed using Primer3 software (Elixir, Narva maantee, Estonia) [41 (link)]. Primers for the various genes were designed to amplify a region containing more than one exon, so that genomic DNA would not be amplified. A total of 2.5 µg RNA from each sample was treated with RQ DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and reverse-transcribed using random hexamer primers (Promega). Real-time PCR was carried out using the SYBR green amplification kit (ABgene, Blenheim Road, Epsom, UK) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Each reaction contained 1 µL cDNA and 1 µM of each primer from the relevant primer pair in a final volume of 10 µL. Quantification of real-time PCR products was carried out by detection of SYBR green fluorescence on a StepOnePlus™ system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Dilution series of cDNA were created for each set of and a standard curve was established for each gene. Triplicate of cDNA were used and each reaction was subjected to melting-point analysis to confirm single amplified products. At least two biological repeats were carried out for each gene. Transcript levels were estimated using a standard curve for each gene, and these levels were normalized against the amount of OeACTIN transcript level in each sample. The sequences of the primers used are listed in the Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Total RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted according to Jaakola et al. (2001) (link). The RNA concentration was determined in a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer, and its integrity was checked by running 1 μl in a 1% (w/v) agarose gel stained with Bromophenol Blue. Total RNA was digested with RQ-DNase (Promega). Complementary DNA was synthesized, using Oligo-dT primers, using a VERSO cDNA kit (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Fungal PHO Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fungal cells were pelleted by centrifugation and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The cells were homogenized by bead beating in the presence of glass beads (425 µm to 600 µm) and TRIzol (Ambion), and RNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s instructions. Residual DNA in RNA samples was removed by treatment with RQ DNase (Promega). cDNA was synthesized using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega). Expression of PHO genes (listed in Table 1) was quantified by quantitative PCR (qPCR) on a Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett Research) using Platinum SYBR green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Life Technologies, Inc.). Primers used for qPCR are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. The expression of each gene was quantified using the 2−ΔΔCT method, where actin (ACT1 [CNAG_00483]) served as a reference (housekeeping) gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptomic Analysis of Transgenic Tobacco

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA extractions were performed on three biological replicates of T1 generation transgenic tobaccos expanding leaves using the TRIzol® (Invitrogen, USA), while RNA extractions for Kalanchoe daigremontiana were performed44 . All samples were treated using RQ DNAse (Promega, USA) and were ethanol precipitated. cDNA synthesis was performed using GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription Systemfor RT-PCR (Promega, USA) with 2 µg RNA and using the oligo (dT) primer. RT-qPCR was performed using the TransStart® Tip Green qPCR SuperMix (TransGenBiotech, China), following the manufacturer instructions and an ABI Step One PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, USA) was used. 200 ng cDNA was used for each reaction. The results were calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method45 (link). The KdActin were used as housekeeping gene and the primers used in RT-qPCR were listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Primer Extension Analysis of A. thaliana TIS and P Sites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs from A. thaliana WT and nuc1.2 plant mutants were extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), according to manufacturer's instructions. Then, all samples were then treated with RQ-DNase (Promega) to eliminate contaminant genomic DNA. Primer extension analysis to detect TIS and P sites was done using 5–10 μg of RNAs and specific 5′end labeled primers, as previously described (Sáez-Vasquez et al., 2004b (link); Pontvianne et al., 2007 (link)). Products of the reaction were analyzed on 8% polyacrylamide/ 7 M urea sequencing gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!