The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xl30 feg

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Netherlands

The XL30 FEG is a field emission gun scanning electron microscope (SEM) manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific. It is designed to provide high-resolution imaging and analysis capabilities for a variety of materials. The core function of the XL30 FEG is to generate a high-energy electron beam and scan it across the surface of a sample, allowing for the collection of detailed information about the sample's topography and composition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

31 protocols using xl30 feg

1

Visualizing Bacterial-Epithelial Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MUC2-producing human colonic carcinoma cell line LS174T ATCC CL-188 (ATCC) was grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C and 5% CO2. Approximately 1 × 105 cells were seeded onto Corning Costar 24-well culture plates containing poly-l-lysine-coated coverslips and grown to confluence. B. dentium was incubated with confluent coverslips at 2 × 105 bacteria and incubated for 1 h anaerobically at 37°C. Coverslips were then washed thoroughly with PBS (3 times) and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Coverslips were dehydrated with ethanol and coated in 20 nm of gold using a desktop sputtering system (Denton Desk II). Slides were viewed in a scanning electron microscope (FEI XL-30FEG) at 12 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to identify the phase composition and the valence states of samples, powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, XRD-7000, Shimadzu, Chiba, Japan) with a Cu-Kα radiation source and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB-250, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) with an Al-Kα radiation source were used. Scanning electron microscope (SEM, XL-30 FEG, FEI, Hillsborough, OR, USA.) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, TECNAI F20, FEI, Hillsborough, OR, USA) were used to investigate the structure and morphology of the samples. The specific surface area and pore structure were determined by N2 adsorption/desorption experiment (ASAP 2020 plus HD88, Micromeritics Instrument Corp, Norcross, GA, USA). Chemical bonding information of the studied samples was gathered with Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet iS50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Encapsulated UV Filters via Antisolvent Precipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ECNPs and ZNPs with quercetin, retinol and p-coumaric acid were prepared via an antisolvent precipitation technique. Briefly, 0.275 g of EC (for ECNPs) or 0.35 g zein (for ZNPs) and 7 wt% quercetin (thus 0.020 g for ECNPs and 0.025 g for ZNPs), 1.5 wt% p-coumaric acid and 1.5 wt% retinol (0.004 g for ECNPs and 0.005 g for ZNPs) were dissolved together in 50 mL ethanol (for ECNPs) or 50 mL of an ethanol/water mixture (80 (v/v)% EtOH) (for ZNPs). This solution was then poured into water (150 mL) under fast magnetic stirring, resulting in the spontaneous formation of ECNPs/ZNPs with encapsulated UV filters. Rotary evaporation removed ethanol and some water to give a 50 mL aqueous dispersion of ECNPs or ZNPs with encapsulated UV filters. The ECNP/ZNP dispersions were filtered through filter paper to remove any large aggregates formed during the antisolvent precipitation. The particles were characterised by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, FEI XL30FEG, samples were sputter coated with platinum), spectrophotometry (HP 8452a), Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measurements (Malvern Zetasizer, particle size distributions obtained using a CONTIN fitting and zeta potential measurements performed in presence of 10 mM NaCl background salt one day after preparation of the particles). DLS and zeta potential measurements were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterizing Porous Titanium Alloy Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An optical microscope (Olympus DP74, Olympus America Inc., United States) was used to observe the structure and surface morphology of the sample. A scanning electron microscope (FEI, XL30-FEG, United States) was used to qualitatively observe the micromorphology of the porous titanium alloy (surface morphology and connectivity). A suitable photo was captured to observe each sample from three selected fields of view; ten values were measured in each field, and the mean pore size was calculated. The calculation method of the porosity of each porous sample was as follows: the volume density (q) of the sample was determined by measuring the physical size and mass of the sample; the Archimedes principle was used to measure apparent density (q') in water. The metal volume fraction (VF) was calculated as follows: VF = q/q'. Porosity PP = 1−VF = 1−(q/q'). According to the method reported by Hotaling (Hotaling et al., 2015 (link)), the ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, United States) was used to calculate the wire diameters of the two porous materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Eumelanin Nanoparticle Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Natural eumelanin extracts from Sepia officinalis (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI, USA) were used as received. Feature dimensions were measured from scanning electron micrographs (Philips XL-30 FEG, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Samples were coated with 4 nm layer of platinum before imaging (Emtech K575X, Quorum Technologies, Guelph, ON, Canada). Aqueous dispersions of MelNP were prepared by ultrasonication of eumelanins in Milli-Q water (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) at 30% amplitude, pulsing every 15 seconds for a total of 20 minutes with the tapered 0.125" microtip (Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). The size distribution of MelNP was measured immediately after ultrasonication via dynamic light scattering (DLS; Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern, Worcestershire, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microscopy Imaging of Powdered Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Light microscopy was carried out on a Axioskop 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Images were recorded and analyzed using Axiovision 2 software.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out on an XL 30 FEG (FEI, Hilsoro, OR, USA) at an acceleration voltage of 5 keV and a working distance of 12.4 mm. Powdered samples were adhered to a carbon patch and sputtered with platin to increase the conductivity of the sample. Secondary electrons and backscatter electrons were detected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Qualitative analysis of samples was performed using scanning electron microscopy (XL30-FEG, FEI). Samples were prepared using a protocol previously described [56 (link)]. Briefly, the biofilm-containing titanium discs were rinsed in PBS and fixed in gluteraldehyde (2.5% v/v in a cacodylate buffer). Samples were rinsed three times in PBS, and subsequently dehydrated in a series of ethanol/H2O solutions with increasing alcohol content, followed by air drying. Finally, a thin conductive Au-Pd film was sputtered (Edwards S150) on the samples and SEM was operated at standard high-vacuum settings and using 10 mm working distance and 20 keV accelerating voltage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visualizing mRNA-NPs with SEM and AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An XL30-FEG (FEI) environmental scanning electron microscope and Park NX10 (Park Systems) atomic force microscope were used to obtain high resolution digital images of the mRNA-NPs. The samples for SEM were coated with Pt. The AFM samples (5 μl) were dissolved in 30 μl buffer (50 mM NiCl2 in TE buffer (pH 7.5; Integrated DNA Technologies)), and deposited onto freshly cleaved mica (Ted Pella). After incubation for 40 min, the mica surface was washed with Milli-Q water and dried. The samples were scanned in non-contact mode with NC-NCH tips (Park Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biomaterial Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
β-TCP scaffolds from in vitro cultures and in vivo explantations were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) by fixation in 3 % glutaraldehyde for at least 24 h at 4 °C. A graded ethanol series of 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100 % followed for sample dehydration. Sample preservation was achieved by hexamethyldisilizane (HMDS) drying. Before gold sputtering and fixation on SEM stubs, scaffolds were sectioned one time longitudinal and orientated in the cross-sectional area for visualization. A field emission SEM microscope (ESEM XL 30 FEG, FEI, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a high-vacuum environment was used.
For a more detailed analysis of gel structure, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) in cryo-mode was performed for collagen I/III and Matrigel®. Gels were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and transferred to the high-vacuum Balzers BF freeze-etching chamber of a FESEM instrument in cryo-mode (HITACHI S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with secondary electron image resolution of 1.0–1.4 nm at voltages of 1–15 kV. Gels were sublimated for 1 h at 80 °C before image acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After incubation with bacteria, washed coverslips were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Alternatively, intestinal segments were opened lengthwise, thoroughly washed with PBS, and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 4 hours at room temperature. Cells then were incubated with 1% osmium tetroxide in PBS (cat. 201030; Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 4°C. Tissue and coverslips were dehydrated with ethanol (10 minutes each in 25%, 50%, 75%, 80%, 95%, and 4 cycles of 100%) at room temperature. In a desktop sputtering system (Denton Desk II), cells were coated with 20 nm of gold and viewed via scanning electron microscopy (FEI XL-30FEG) at 12 kV as previously described.57 Adobe Photoshop (San Jose, CA) was used to falsely color resulting images based on the morphology of bacterial cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!