The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using ta vector

1

Overexpression of Fra-1 in Cervical Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The coding region of the Fra-1 gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primer sequences for the Fra-1 gene were 5′-atactcgaatgaacctggccatcagcat-3′ and 5′-gcggaattctcacagggacatgaaatccg-3′. The conditions for PCR amplification were one cycle for 5 min at 94°C; 30 cycles for 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 55°C, and 90 s at 72°C, and a final cycle for 10 min at 72°C. The coding region fragments of the Fra-1 gene were cloned into the TA vector (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, United States) for transformation in Escherichia coli JM109 (Takara, Dalian, China). In the TA vector, restriction endonuclease xhoi and ecor1 (Promega) were used to cut the required DNA fragments, which were then subcloned into the pEGFP-N1 vector. The accuracy of the cloned sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing using an ABI 3730 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States).
To construct a stable cervical cancer cell line overexpressing Fra-1, we transfected HeLa cells with the pEGFP-N1/Fra-1 or pEGFP-N1 (blank control vector) using Lipofectin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions as described previously (Xiao et al., 2015 (link)). This was followed by G418 selection. Western blotting was performed to detect the expression level of Fra-1 protein to verify successful establishment of the stable cell line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ChIP-qPCR Analysis of CCR6DNP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ChiP assay was performed as described in Noss et al., 2015 [46 (link)]. PARP-1 antibody was purchased from Genetex (GTX100573). The CCR6DNP fragment was detected by qPCR with 5’ primer: GTGAGAAGTTTGGGAGACATGT and 3’ primer TTGGAAACGCTCTAATAGACCAC. For assessing the frequency of both alleles on the CCR6DNP in wild type HCT116 cells before and after the ChIP assays, CCR6DNP fragments were cloned into TA vectors (Promega) and sequenced by T7 primer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cloning and Sequencing of Wheat Lr34 Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two primers, Cssfr6-MF2and Cssfr6-MR1 (Table 1), were designed to amplify a fragment that spanned the region from part of exon 11 to part of exon 14. The amplified PCR products were cloned into TA vectors, and four clones for each of the two alleles were sequenced.
The complete gene was isolated using two pairs of primers, ExpF1 and Cssfr6-MR1 amplifying the gene from the start codon to exon 14, and Cssfr6-MF2 and Lr34-ExpR1 amplifying the gene from exon 11 to the stop codon. The Lr34 PCR products were cloned into TA vectors (Promega), and plasmid DNAs of several individual positive colonies were sequenced. The resistant gene and the susceptibility genes were distinguishable in the overlapped region from exon 11 to exon 14, so the complete gene for each of them was assembled. The entire sequences for each gene were aligned with published Chinese Spring genome sequences of Lr34-A (TraesCS7A01G085800), Lr34-B (pseudogene), and Lr34 (TraesCS7D01G080300) to determine specific sequences for each of the homoeologous genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing CRISPR Deletion in HBG Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 5.2-kb probe encompassing the intervening region between gRNA-1 cleavage sites in HBG2 and HBG1 was generated by PCR amplification and cloned using TA vector (Promega). Nick translation was used to label purified DNA with red-dUTP (Alexa-Fluor-594, Molecular Probes), and a control HBB probe (RP11-1205H24) independently with green-dUTP (Alexa-Fluor-488, Molecular Probes). The probes were hybridized simultaneously with interphase and metaphase cells in 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, and 2× SCC. Metaphase cells were stained with DAPI and scored for signals representing the potentially deleted region (red) and HBB (green).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cloning and Sequencing of Small RNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small RNAs <200 nt in length were isolated using the mirVana RNA isolation Kit (Ambion, Foster City, CA, USA) in A549 cells. The isolated small RNAs were cloned into vectors using the DynaExpress-miRNA cloning Kit (BioDynamics Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan); The small RNAs were separated with a 15% denaturing PAGE gel. The 15- to 30-nt RNAs were dephosphorylated using alkaline phosphatase, and the small RNAs were ligated to 3′ linkers (these products were blocked at the 3’-end, which prevented re-circularisation at the 5′-end). The linker-ligated RNAs were separated with a 15% denaturing gel, and 36- to 46-nt RNAs were extracted, purified and synthesised into cDNA using reverse transcriptase. The PCR products were cloned into the T-A vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and sequenced (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea). The detailed protocol is described previously25 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analyzing Germinal Center B Cell Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild Type (Rosa26- Cre ERT2+, Rptor+/+) or Rptor knockout (Rosa26-CreER T2+, Rptor f/f ->Δ/Δ) B cells were transferred into μMT recipients (5×106 cells per recipient). The mice were immunized with NP-KLH in alum as above, and harvested ten days later. Viable (Ghost dye-excluding cells in the viable lymphoid FSC × SSC gate) NP-specific germinal center B cells as well as naïve (GL7 IgD+) B cells were flow sorted and lysed for cellular DNA. [This viable cell gate is devoid of early apoptotic cells (i.e., annexin-V+ or cleaved caspase-3+ events).] Nested PCR was performed as previously described (43 (link)) and gel purified products were subcloned into TA vector [Promega (Madison, WI)] for sequencing. Sequences were aligned and scored for mutations using MEGA software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cloning and Characterization of PKCα and PKCδ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The B16F10 melanoma cancer cell were cultured in DMEM (10% FCS). The mRNA from B16F10 cell was isolated using Trizol and converted to cDNA via cDNA synthesis kit (Roche, USA). The accession numbers of PKCα and PKCδ are: NM_011101 and NM_011103. The following primers were used to clone PKCα (forward, 5′-CCG CTC GAG ATG GCT GAC GTT TAC CCG-3′; reverse, 5′-GGG GTA CCT CAT ACT GCA CTT TGC AAG ATT G-3′) and PKCδ (forward, 5′-CTA GCT AGC ATG GCA CCC TTC CTG CG-3′; reverse, 5′-CGC GGA TCC TTA AAT GTC CAG GAA TTG CTC AAA CTT G-3′). The gene products were cloned in TA vector (Promega, USA) as per manufacturer’s protocol and subsequently sub-cloned in pd2EGFP-N1 vector using the restriction enzymes Xho 1 and KPN 1 for PKCα and NHE 1 and BAM H1 for PKCδ (Roche, USA). The sequence of the clone was confirmed by automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing Swine Influenza Viruses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral RNAs from isolated swine influenza viruses were purified using a Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN). cDNA was synthesized using an ImProm-II™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, USA) with the influenza A virus Uni 12 primer (AGCAAAAGCAGG). Eight segments of the isolated swine influenza viruses, PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, NA, M and NS, were amplified using GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, USA) with universal primer sets as described [38 (link)]. The amplicons were separated by electrophoresis on an agarose gel, purified using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN), and cloned into a TA vector (Promega, Madison, USA). The sequences of the cloned amplicons were determined at Cosmo Co. (Daejeon, Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transgenic Mouse Generation by BLM Overexpression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure is outlined below. The human BLM cDNA was amplified from plasmid pJK1 and cloned into the TA-vector (Promega). The construct was sequenced and verified. A 0.44 kb fragment, corresponding to the phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter was cloned in to the 5′ end of the BLM cDNA. The PGK-BLM cDNA fragment was then cloned into the vector pOPRSVICat, containing a synthetic intron and the HSV thymidine kinase (TK) polyadenylation signal. The PGK-BLMcDNA-p(A) fragment was removed by restriction digestion from the vector, purified and introduced into C57Bl-6J oocytes by pronuclear injection. Founder lines were generated and initially screened for the presence of the transgene by Southern blotting. A probe corresponding to the 3′ end of the BLM cDNA was used. Once germline transmission had been established, transgenic animals were routinely identified using PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from F0, F1, and F2 mice. PCR was performed using Taq DNA polymerase (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). The primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Material, Table S1. The PCR products were purified using the Gel/PCR Extraction Kit (NIPPON Genetics, Tokyo, Japan). The purified PCR products were sequenced using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) through an Applied Biosystems 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), or restriction enzyme digestion was performed by RspRS II enzyme (Takara Bio Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In some cases, PCR products were cloned into TA vector (Promega, Madison, WI) before sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!