The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

36 protocols using delsa nano

1

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The equipment used includes a Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) (IR-Prestige-21, SHIMADZU), a Particle Size Analyzer (PSA) (DelsaTM Nano Beckman Coulter), a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (JOEL-6510 LA), a Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) (DSC-60, SHIMADZU), a Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) (DTG-60, SHIMADZU), and an MTS EM tensile test with ASTM D638 Plastics Tension 1229.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Zeta Potential of EAPL SNEDDS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Charge on drug loaded droplet surface was determined using Zetasizer Beckman Coulter, Delsa TM Nano. Analysis time was kept for 60 s and average ZP, charge and mobility of optimized formulation of EAPL complex SNEDDS was determined. The zeta potential was measured after dilution of samples with distilled water at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Zeta Potential Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The zeta potential was measured by Delsa Nano (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA). Single measurements were made based on 70 accumulated scans captured at refractive index, 1.33; viscosity, 0.89 cP; dielectric constant, 78.3; and temperature, 25 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of TPGS2000-DOX Micelles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle size and zeta potential of the TPGS2000-DOX micelles were analyzed using Malvern Zetasizer Instruments (DelsaNano, Beckman Coulter). The shape and surface morphology of the micelles were observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM; Japan) following negative staining with a 2% solution of phosphotungstic acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Targeted Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthesized MSNPs were characterized for size and zeta potential using Nanosight, LM10 (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) and DelsaNano (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), respectively. Surface morphology of MSNPs and their porosity were studied by field emission-scanning electron microscopy (Bruker, Fällanden, Switzerland) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, operated at 200 kV accelerating voltage; Bruker), respectively. For TEM, MSNPs were deposited on carbon-coated copper TEM grids of 200 mesh and air dried. Further, targeted and bare MSNPs were characterized using FT-IR spectroscopy by dispersing the samples in KBr pellets. The FT-IR spectra were recorded in the range of 400–4,000 cm−1. Additionally, Raman spectroscopy was also performed for bare and targeted MSNPs to further confirm the conjugation. For this, concentrated solutions of bare, as well as targeted MSNPs were placed on glass slides and allowed to dry for making a layer of MSNPs. Then, separate Raman spectra were recorded for targeted and bare MSNPs at RT between 3,600 and 100 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Particle Size and Polydispersity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) were determined by dynamic light scattering (Beckman Coulter DelsaNano) at 25°C. TyroSphere liquid dispersions were diluted 10 times for size measurement and were examined in triplicate by normalized intensity distribution for cumulants, size distribution, and polydispersity. An average of 50 measurements were recorded per replicate (Kilfoyle et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and Characterization of SPIONs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) were synthesized using coprecipitation method.45 (link) Prior to the synthesis, 0.5 M NaOH solution in deionized water (DIW) was prepared in a three-neck 500 mL round-bottom flask (RBF) and degassed by bubbling N2 under stirring at room temperature (RT) for 30 min, followed by degas under vacuum under stirring at RT for another 30 min, and then it was heated to 40 °C. Then ferric chloride FeCl3·H2O (6.56 g, 0.024 mol) and ferrous chloride FeCl2·4H2O (2.48 g, 0.012 mol) were dissolved in 25 mL of degassed 0.4 M HCl solution in DIW and then added to the RBF through a septum. The RBF was heated at 80 °C under strong stirring for 1 h. SPIONs were precipitated using a strong neodymium N52 magnet, and then the reaction mixture was decanted. The SPIONs were washed five times by dispersing them back in EtOH (300 mL) with probe sonication for 10 min, followed by magnet precipitation and decantation of the liquid. A dry powder of SPIONs was obtained by drying under vacuum on a rotary evaporator. The product was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Hydrodynamic size and zeta potential were characterized by dynamic light scattering using Beckman Coulter Delsa Nano.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Particle Size and Zeta Potential Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle sizes were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Delsa Nano (Beckman Instruments Corporation). In total, 10 µL of the sample and 90 µL of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) were mixed in sample wells before measuring the particle sizes at 25°C. The zeta potential of each sample was measured using a Zeta Analyzer (Beckman Instruments Corporation) to determine the electrophoretic light scattering at 25°C. All samples used for the zeta potential measurements were prepared at the same concentration as those used for particle sizing. The particle size of each sample was measured three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanoparticle Size Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1x PBS (10 mL) was used to dilute IR783-NBs-Affibody mother liquor (1 mL). The size distributions of IR783-NB-Affibody (1.5 mL) and SonoVue microbubble (1.5 mL) were measured by particle size analyzer (DelsaNano, Beckman Coulter, USA) at 25°C. The results were calculated as a mean value after three repeated measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Liposome Formulation and Buprenorphine Loading

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liposomes were prepared by the thin film hydration method 20 (link)–22 (link). A lipid mixture of 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC; Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA) and cholesterol (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) 2:1 molar ratio was dissolved in a 9:1 chloroform : methanol solution. The lipid mixture underwent vacuum evaporation to form a dry lipid film. T-butanol was used to dissolve the lipid thin film and freeze-dried to form a lipid cake. The lipid cake was hydrated with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), DMED solution (1 mg/mL PBS; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), DexP solution (50 mg/mL PBS; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), or 250 mM (NH4)2SO4. The liposomes then underwent ten freeze-thaw cycles followed by dialysis against PBS for 48 hours. Bup (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was loaded into liposomes using a previously reported remote loading technique 23 (link). Briefly, after dialysis in PBS, the liposomes that were hydrated with 250 mM (NH4)2SO4 were loaded with Bup upon incubation with a 50 mg/mL Bup hydrochloride solution at 50°C for 1 h. The liposomes were then dialyzed against PBS for 48 hours.
Liposome size was determined by dynamic light scattering (Delsa Nano, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Drug loading was determined by HPLC after disrupting the liposomes with 100 mM octyl β-D-glucopyranoside (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!