The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

87 protocols using attofluor cell chamber

1

Scratch Wound Healing Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Migration was measured using a scratch wound healing assay as previously described (Liang et al., 2007 (link)). HPAECs were seeded on glass coverslips coated in 0.2% gelatin and fibronectin (5 mg per liter). Coverslips were mounted in an Attofluor cell chamber (Cat# A78-16; Invitrogen). Images were collected using Olympus VivaView Incubator/Fluorescence Microscope with 40× air objective (equivalent to UPLSAPO40X, NA 0.95) under transmitted light at 37°C in 5% CO2. MRI wound healing plugin for ImageJ Image Analysis software was used to measure the distance migrated by cells. The distance was measured at 5 to 10 positions for each field of view and averaged. The distance measured for each sample was then normalized by the average distance for scramble control in the same experiment. Results from three or four independent experiments were expressed as normalized distance traveled. Statistical significance was determined using a Student’s t test for pairwise comparison between conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Muscle Stimulation Protocols for Functional Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimulation of the TA muscle was performed as previously described (11 (link), 68 (link)) at 100-Hz stimulation frequency, 300-ms stimulation duration every second, 0.3-ms pulse duration, and 15-V electric potential for 20 min. Stimulation of cultured, single FDB muscle fibers was performed by insertion of a custom, three-dimensional (3D)–printed insert containing two parallel platinum electrodes ∼10 mm apart into a Attofluor cell chamber (Invitrogen) that was filled with Tyrode’s buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl22H2O, 1 mM MgCl26H2O, 0.2 mM NaH2PO4, 12 mM NaHCO3, and 5.5 mM Glucose, pH = 6.5). The 3D-printed stimulation insert has a rectangular opening in the center for microscope visualization. Stimulation was modified from previous studies (69 (link)–71 (link, link)), which consisted of 70-Hz stimulation frequency, 350-ms stimulation duration every 2 s, 0.3-ms pulse duration, and 150-V electric potential for 20 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualization of VLPs Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 24 hr seeding, 2 × 106 HEK293T cells were transfected with 8 µg of I-BAR-GFP expressing plasmid with or without 8 µg of pGag/pGag(i)mCherry plasmids (2/3 and 1/3, respectively). After 24 hr transfection, cell media (9 mL) was filtered before performing VLPs purification by ultracentrifugation in an SW41Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter) at 29,000 rpm, for 1 hr 30 min, at 4°C, on a 20% sucrose cushion in TNE buffer. Dry pellets were resuspended in 110 µL of TNE and allowed to sediment on round 25 mm coverslips for 45 min in an AttoFluor Cell Chamber (Invitrogen). VLPs were imaged with a Nikon Ti Eclipse 2 TIRF microscope. Images were taken with an Evolve EMCCD camera – 512 photometrics, using a NA = 1.45, 100× objective and using 488 and 561 nm lasers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Transfection for Receptor Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293TN cells
(System Biosciences, LV900A-1) and HeLA cells (American Tissue Culture
Collection: Manassas, VA) were cultured using Dulbecco’s modified
Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplied with glutamax, 10% fetal bovine
serum, penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and
incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. All cell culture reagents
were obtained from Invitrogen (Bleiswijk, NL). Cells were transfected
in a 35 mm dish holding a glass coverslip (24 mm ⌀, Menzel-Gläser,
Braunschweig, Germany), using polyethylenimine (3 μL of PEI:1
μL of DNA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
For each transfection, we used 500 ng of the receptor (H1R, H1R DRY,
AT1AR, or AT1AR DRY)-carrying plasmid. Other
plasmids were transfected at 100 ng (ßarr1 fusion constructs),
150 ng (ßarr2 fusion constructs), 200 ng (Lck-mVenus, CKAR, YC3.6),
250 ng (EKARcyt, EKARnuc), 300 ng (DORA-RhoA), and 750 ng (Gq reporter, Gi1 reporter). The samples were imaged 1 day
after transfection: coverslips were mounted in an Attofluor cell chamber
(Invitrogen, Breda, NL) and submerged in 1 mL microscopy medium (20
mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid, pH = 7.4, 137
mM NaCl, 5.4 mL KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM glucose; Sigma-Aldrich/Merck).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Transfection and Live-Cell Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells (American Tissue Culture Collection: Manassas, VA, USA) and N1E-115 Neuroblastoma cells (European Collection of Cell Cultures: Salisbury, UK) were cultured using Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplied with Glutamax, 10% FBS, Penicillin (100 U/ml) and Streptomycin (100 μg/ml). All cell culture media were obtained from Invitrogen (Bleiswijk, NL).
Cells were transfected in a 35 mm dish holding a glass 24 mm Ø #1 coverslip (Menzel-Gläser, Braunschweig, Germany), using 1–2 μl Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen), 0.5–1 μg plasmid DNA and 50 μl OptiMeM (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, NL). N1E-115 cells were transfected in OptiMeM to accomplish neurite outgrowth by serum starvation53 (link).
Samples were imaged 1 day after transfection unless stated otherwise. After overnight incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2, coverslips were mounted in an Attofluor cell chamber (Invitrogen, Breda, NL) and submerged in microscopy medium (20 mM HEPES (PH = 7.4), 137 mM NaCL, 5.4 mM KCL, 1.8 mM CaCL2, 0.8 mM MgCl2 and 20 mM glucose). All live cell microscopy was done at 37 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Orai1 Calcium Signaling in Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the contribution of Orai1 activity to scratch-induced changes in cytosolic Ca2+ and Na+, PAECs were grown on a 25-mm diameter coverglass (catalog no. 12-545-102, Fisherbrand) that was suspended in a 35 mm dish. Once the cells grew to confluence after 4–5 days, the monolayer was rinsed three times with Krebs-Henseleit (Krebs) buffer (catalog no. K3753, Sigma, ~156 mM Na+, 290 mOsm, pH 7.4) containing 2 mM CaCl2 (catalog no. 223506, Sigma) and 25 mM HEPES (catalog no. 3375, Sigma). The monolayer was incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes with 6.315 μM Cal-590 AM (catalog no. 20510, AAT Bioquest) or 9.225 μM Ion NaTRIUM Green-2 AM (catalog no. ab142802, Abcam) in 1 mL Krebs buffer containing 8 μL Pluronic F-127 (catalog no. P6866, Life Technologies). The monolayer was then washed twice and incubated with 10 μM GSK-7975A or vehicle control (DMSO 1:1371 dilution) in 1 mL Krebs buffer at room temperature for 15 minutes. Finally, the coverglass was assembled into an Attofluor cell chamber (catalog no. A7816, Invitrogen), and 2 mL fresh 10 μM GSK-7975A or vehicle control was added. Scratching was done immediately before time-lapse imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

TIRFM Imaging of f-ROS Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A suspension of f-ROS with fluorescent probe was introduced into a small chamber made of Secure-Seal from GRACE Bio-Labs (Bend, OR) on a glass slide (Matsunami, Tokyo, Japan) placed in an Attofluor Cell Chamber from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK). After 10 min, sedimentation of f-ROS onto the glass surface was complete. The chamber was set on the stage of a total internal reflection fluorescence microscope (TIRFM; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan, TE2000), and the aqueous phase was continuously perfused (0.1 ml min−1) with a buffer containing an oxygen-scavenging system freshly prepared by mixing substrate (2.25 mg·ml−1 glucose) and enzymes (216 µg ml−1 glucose oxidase and 36 µg ml−1 catalase). When GTP was applied to f-ROSs, the chamber was perfused with freshly prepared perfusion buffer containing 500 µM of GTP. Fluorescently labelled Fab′1D4 on disc membranes was illuminated with the highly inclined laser beam of 750-nm wavelength. Images were acquired with an electron-multiplying CCD camera C9100-12 (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) at a spatiotemporal resolution of 30 frames s−1 and 76 nm pixel−1. The TIRFM was equipped with Nikon 100×/1.45 Plan-Apo objectives. A filter set consisting of 760DRLP (Chroma Technology Corp., Bellows Falls, VT) and HQ810/90 (Omega Optical) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ring-Barrier Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration was observed using the ring-barrier migration assay as previously described [40 (link)]. Briefly, 3 × 105 cells were seeded on fibronectin (10 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)-coated coverslips in an Attofluor Cell Chamber (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and migration was monitored for 24 h in DMEM medium supplemented with 1% FBS. Time-lapse imaging was conducted on an Axiovert 100 M inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss B.V., Sliedrecht, Netherlands). Parameters of cell migration were obtained from the acquired sequence using AxioVision SE64 Rel.4.9.1 software (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Three independent experiments were performed in triplicates, and from each replicate, 10 cells’ trajectories were obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Preparing Water-Alkane Interfaces with Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The source and
purification of water and alkane are described in the Supporting Information. The water/n-alkane interfaces were prepared in an Attofluor cell chamber (Invitrogen,
Leiden, Netherlands) equipped with a 150 μm thick microscope
cover glass slide as the bottom. An aluminum foil O-ring with an inner
diameter of 0.5 cm and a thickness of approximately 0.3 mm was glued
on the glass slide to restrict the sample volume for the aqueous phase.
To prepare a water/n-alkane interface suspended with
nanoparticles, a defined amount of water was added into the cell.
Then we added a nanoparticle dichloromethane solution on top of the
aqueous solution. The dichloromethane was allowed to evaporate for
typically 15 s. Finally, alkane was added carefully on top of the
water surface. The resulting surface coverage of tracer nanoparticles
was around 1–2 μm2 per particle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Visualization of Vascular and Hematopoietic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MacGreen embryos were stained by intra-aortic flushing with anti-CD31-AF647 (clone MEC13.3, Biolegend) and anti-c-Kit-BV421 (clone 2B8, BD Biosciences) antibodies and incubated 30min at 4°C in PBS + 10% FBS. The embryos were then transversally thick-sectioned with an automatic tissue chopper into 150μm sections that were embedded in low melting agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) and placed in a chamber ring support (Attofluor cell chamber, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) closed at the bottom with a round glass cover slip (Menzel Gläser, VWR, Pennsylvania, USA). The agarose-embedded sections were then covered with MyeloCult M5300 medium (StemCell Technologies) supplemented with hydrocortisone succinate 10−6M (Sigma-Aldrich) and mIL3 20ng/ml (Peprotech, New Jersey, USA). Overnight imaging was performed either on a CSU-W1 Spinning disk confocal (Videos S1 and S2) or a Andor spinning disk (20x objective) and analyzed with the integrated software with a 10-minute interval for a total of 14–16 h, step size 3 μm and a z-range of 20–40 steps. The samples were maintained at 37°C. Videos were analyzed with Slidebook software (3i, Colorado, USA). Lateral drifting of the section imaged in the movie 2 was corrected with Huygens software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!