The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using oris 96 well cell migration assay kit

1

In vitro Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro cell migration was determined by using the OrisTM 96-well cell migration assay kit (Platypus Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instruction. 5 × 104 of PC3 cells were seeded in each well and left for 24 h. The stoppers that were used to create the migration zone were removed after 24 h and the cells were washed with PBS to remove any unattached cells. 100 μL of fresh media with or without the plant extracts were added to each well. The cells were allowed to migrate into the migration zone for 72 h. Cells were fluorescently stained with CellTrackerTM Green (Life Technologies). The seeded plate was incubated in a humidified chamber for 72 h and at various time points (24, 48, and 72 h), the fluorescent signals in the detection zone were measured using a microplate reader (SynergyTM HT, BioTek) with 492 nm excitation and 517 nm emission filters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OrisTM 96-well cell migration assay kit was from Platypus Technologies and CytoSelect Cell Migration Assay kit was purchased from Cell Biolab, Inc. CellTrackerTM Green was from Life Technologies. Cytoselect 24-well cell invasion assay kit was purchased from Cell Biolab, Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Migration Assay with TGF-β1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MIO-M1 cell migration was evaluated using an Oris 96-well cell migration assay kit (Platypus Technologies, Madison, WI), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were seeded in each well and transfected with siRNAs. After 1 hour of pretreatment with 1% FBS/DMEM containing 10 ng/ml TGF-β1 with 5 mM aphidicolin (Fuji Film Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) to inhibit cell division, the stoppers were removed to allow cells to migrate into the detection zone. The cells were then incubated for 48 hours and stained with PBS containing calcein AM (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) for 1 hour. The signal intensity of the stained cells that migrated into the detection zone was measured with an Infinite F200 PRO microplate reader in the fluorescence mode (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland) using a fluorescence filter set (excitation, 485 nm; emission, 535 nm) with an Oris detection mask attached to the bottom of the plate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Oris Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro cell migration was measured using the Oris™ 96-well cell migration assay kit (Platypus Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In vitro Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro cell migration of hTCEpi cells was measured using the Oris 96-well cell migration assay kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Platypus Technologies, Madison, WI), as previously described (Makuloluwa and Shams, 2018 (link)). Briefly, hTCEpi cells were seeded in the wells of a plate around a stopper placed in the center of each well. The cells were incubated at 37 °C and cultured to full confluence surrounding the stopper. CH was then added at the above-described concentrations at the same time the stopper was removed to allow cells to migrate into the central detection zone for 12 h; Negative (vehicle) and positive controls (cytochalasin D, inhibit migration) were run simultaneously. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) 1:5000. Cells were fluorescently imaged immediately after staining (Keyence Digital Microscope, Osaka, Japan). The area of the migration was measured using ImageJ software (ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and the percentage of migration was calculated relative to the negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immortalized Cell Lines for Functional Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HaCaT (ATCC, Manassas, VA), a spontaneously transformed immortal keratinocyte cell line from skin was maintained in high glucose DMEM medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), and TIGK (gift from Dr. Richard J. Lamont, University of Louisville), a telomerase immortalized epithelial cell line from oral mucosa (gingiva) was grown in DermaLife K medium (Lifeline Cell Technology) supplemented Life Factors (Lifeline Cell Technology), as previously described27 (link),44 (link). For functional analysis, miR-21 mimic and a control non-targeting miRNA mimic (GE Healthcare Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO), or anti-miR-10b LNA inhibitor and negative control LNA (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), were transfected into cells using DharmaFECT Transfection Reagent 1 as described previously45 (link)–47 (link). Cell proliferation was measured using the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide] assay as described previously26 (link),48 (link). In vitro cell migration was measured using the Oris 96-well cell migration assay kit (Platypus Technologies, Fitchburg, WI) as described previously45 (link). The cells that migrated into the detection zone were counted using ImageJ analysis software (version 1.421).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Oris Cell Migration Assay for AG1478 Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell migration was measured using the Oris™ 96-well cell migration assay kit (Platypus Technologies, Madison, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, on the first day, 5 × 104 cells were seeded in each well. On day 2, the stopper was removed to allow cells to migrate into the detection zone. Culture medium containing AG1478 (5 μM) or DMSO (control) was added and cell migration to central zone was monitored at 24 h and 48 h. The picture of the cells that migrated into the detection zone was taken using inverted microscope Leica DMI3000 B (Leica Microsystems, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Oris™ 96-well cell migration assay kit (CMA1.101, Platypus Technologies) was used (3.5 × 104 cells seeded/well). After plug removal, cells were treated without or with HGF (20 ng/ml) and PHA-665752 or ARQ197. Cell migration was monitored for 25 h using an automated ImageXpress Micro 2 (Molecular Devices) equipped with environmental control. Images were acquired at 5 h intervals with a 10× 0.2 NA Plan Apo objective (Nikon) and Roper CoolSNAP HQ camera (Roper Scientific). Wound closure was quantified using the threshold method in the MetaXpress software (Version MX 3.1.0.93).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In vitro Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro cell migration of hTCEpi cells was measured using the Oris 96-well cell migration assay kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Platypus Technologies, Madison, WI), as previously described (Makuloluwa and Shams, 2018 (link)). Briefly, hTCEpi cells were seeded in the wells of a plate around a stopper placed in the center of each well. The cells were incubated at 37 °C and cultured to full confluence surrounding the stopper. CH was then added at the above-described concentrations at the same time the stopper was removed to allow cells to migrate into the central detection zone for 12 h; Negative (vehicle) and positive controls (cytochalasin D, inhibit migration) were run simultaneously. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) 1:5000. Cells were fluorescently imaged immediately after staining (Keyence Digital Microscope, Osaka, Japan). The area of the migration was measured using ImageJ software (ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and the percentage of migration was calculated relative to the negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Migration Assay with RESV and PDGF-BB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration assay was performed using an Oris 96-well cell migration assay kit (Platypus Technologies, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions as described previously44 (link). Briefly, 5 × 104 cells were seeded in each well. After 1 h pretreatment with DMEM with 3% FBS containing RESV and recombinant PDGF-BB at 50 ng/ml with 5 μM aphidicolin (Sigma-Aldrich) to inhibit cell division, the stoppers were removed to allow cells to migrate into the detection zone. The cells were incubated for 48 h and stained with PBS containing calcein AM (Life Technologies) for 1 h. The area of cell migration was determined using Photoshop software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!