The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Optima 5300 dv

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom

The Optima 5300 DV is an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) manufactured by PerkinElmer. It is designed for the analysis of a wide range of elements in various sample types, including environmental, geological, and industrial samples. The Optima 5300 DV utilizes dual-view technology, allowing for both axial and radial plasma viewing to provide enhanced sensitivity and detection limits.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

249 protocols using optima 5300 dv

1

Quantification of Macro and Micronutrients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the case of P, 0.5 mL of the sample was taken and 4 mL of water Type I and 0.5 mL of ammonium molybdovanadate 1% solution were added. The sample was stirred and the absorbance was measured in a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (UV2600, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Quantification was based on a calibration curve, and the results were expressed in mg 100 g−1 of dry weight sample.
For the analysis of macronutrients, an aliquot of 4.5 mL of sample was taken in a test tube, 0.5 mL of lanthanum 1% solution was added for determination of Ca and Mg. In the case of Na and K, 0.5 mL of lithium 1% solution was added in the same volume of sample and to eliminate interferences.
For the analysis of micronutrients (Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn), 5 mL of each sample was taken and no solutions were added for interferences. In the prepared samples, the absorbance was measured in an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AA7000, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). S and B content were measured directly from the solutions of each sample in an inductively coupled plasma spectrophotometer (5300 Optima DV, Perkin Elmer, Bresia, Italy). The quantification was carried out using calibration curves for each element; the results were expressed as mg 100 g−1 of dry weight sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Simulated Gastric Fluid Exposure of Zeolite Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As the simulated gastric fluid (SGF, pH = 1.2), an aqueous solution of 0.1 M HCl without enzymes was used [21 (link)]. The deionized water used for all experiments was obtained from a Milli-Q Plus water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Zeolite samples were exposed to SGF solution under mild shaking conditions at 37 ± 0.5 °C in 1:2, 1:1, 2.5:1, 5:1, and 10:1 zeolite-to-SGF ratios (w:v) for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days. After immersion, the liquid phase was separated by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min and filtered through a 45 µm cellulose acetate membrane. The concentrations of Si, Al, Fe, Ca, Mg, K, Na, and P released in SGF were measured using a 5300 Optima DV (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) after microwave digestion using the method described previously [9 ]. For the ICP-OES, external calibration using calibration solutions in the range of 0–20 mg L−1 were prepared from 1000 mg L−1 multielement (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe and Al) and monoelement (P and Si) standard solutions (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) diluted in 0.5% (v:v) HNO3 [39 (link)]. The experiments were carried out in triplicate and the average values were reported. The pH changes of SGF before and after exposure of zeolites were monitored using a Seven Excellence multiparameter (Mettler Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland) [9 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Wastewater Quality Analysis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of wastewater were determined using a Seven Excellence multiparameter (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) after 1 h of settling. Specific metal co (Mn, Al, K, Ca, Na, Fe, Mg, Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, and Cr) content was determined by the digestion of samples with a mixture of 65% HNO3 and 37% HCl at a volume ratio of 1:3 in a closed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) vessel, using a microwave digestion system (Speedwave MWS-3+, Berghof, Eningen, Germany). The resulting solutions were measured using inductively coupled plasma—optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, 5300 Optima DV, Perkin Elmer, Whaltham, MA, USA) [29 (link)]. Anionic surfactants from wastewater were determined according to EN 903 [30 ]. Anion (NO2 and NO3) content was measured by ion chromatography using a 761 IC compact ion chromatograph (Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland) according to standard ISO 10301-1 [31 ]. The wastewater samples were filtered through 0.45 μm polytetrafluoroethylene membrane filters to eliminate the solid particles [31 ]. Ammonium (NH4+) content was determined with a Lambda UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) applying the salicylate–hypochlorite method [32 ]. Biological oxygen demand (BOD) was determined according to ISO 5815 [33 ] and chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined according to ISO 6060 [34 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Ni by ICP-AES

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ICP-AES was used to quantify total Ni in solution. Samples were prepared by centrifugation to remove any suspended particles and the supernatants were diluted to below <10 ppm Ni in 2% nitric acid. Samples were analyzed together with standards (from 10 ppm stocks obtained from VWR) on a Perkin-Elmer Optima 5300 DV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ICP-OES Analysis of Battery Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical compositions of the lithium carbonates, hydroxide precursors, and cathode materials were determined by an ICP-OES (PerkinElmer Optima 5300 DV, PerkinElmer, Inc.). Lithium carbonates were dissolved in an HCl solution. Hydroxide precursors and cathode materials were dissolved in aqua regia (HCl:HNO3 = 3:1). All dissolved samples were diluted in deionized water. Calibration curves were generated using at least three standard solutions, with the results used only from correlation coefficients that were greater than 0.999 and relative standard deviation (RSD) <5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mg2+ Release Kinetics of PO-PPM Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three samples per group of PO-PPM5 and PO-PPM10 scaffolds were placed in 5 ml tubes, added 2 ml PBS buffer, shaken at 100 rpm in a shaker at 37°C and sampled at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days, respectively. For each experiment, 1 ml of the supernatant was removed and supplemented with 1 ml PBS buffer. The supernatant was diluted 30 times with 0.2 M HCl solution, ensuring that all Mg was dissolved, and the Mg2+ concentration in the supernatant was tested by using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer, optima 5300DV, Perkin Elmer instruments Ltd, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Borate Bioactive Glasses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and the elemental distribution of borate BGs were characterized by using a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Auriga, Zeiss, Germany) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, X-MaxN, Oxford Instruments) system. Transmission electron microscope (TEM, TALOS F200S) was also applied to observe the microstructure of the BGs.
The actual compositions of borate BGs were determined by Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, PerkinElmer Optima 5300 DV). The chemical structure of borate BGs was investigated by Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy (IR-Affinity-1S, Shimadzu, Japan) performed at the resolution of 4/cm and by applying 40 scans within the wavenumber range of 400–2000/cm. Glass crystallization was studied by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, Rigaku, MiniFlex 600, Japan) in the 2θ range of 20°–60° and step size of 0.020°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were acquired by a Hitachi HT7800 electron microscopy operating at 120.0 kV. Size distribution and zeta potential were evaluated by a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90 equipment. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on a STA 449C simultaneous thermal analyzer (Netzsch, Germany). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Germany). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were collected on a Thermo Nicolet iS50 FTIR spectrometer. The X-ray photoelectronic spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha spectrophotometer. The contents of released Cu and Mn elements were measured by an inductively coupled plasma instrument (ICP-OES, PerkinElmer Optima 5300 DV). UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded by a spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu, Japan). Electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra were performed by an EMXplus spectrometer (Bruker, Germany). The fluorescence experiments were performed with a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence apparatus at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Membrane Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples taken during the ED runs and the membrane characterization were analyzed for their ionic and carbon composition. Cations were measured via inductive-coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Optima 5300DV, Perkin Elmer, Waltham (HQ), MA, USA), and anions through ion chromatography (IC, 761 Compact IC, Metrohm, Tampa, FL, USA). A TOC analyzer (Shimadzu TOC-VCPH) was used to measure total carbon (TC), inorganic carbon (IC), and total organic carbon (TOC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Pd-Doped Porous Microspheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sizes and shape of TDI droplets, the microspheres PPM and Pd@PPM were examined under optical microscope (OM, BX-51, Olympus). Their size (Dn) and size distribution (Dw/Dn) were obtained by counting at least 200 microspheres. Surface and inner morphology of the microspheres were observed under scanning electronic microscope (SEM, Quanta FEG-250, FEI). Their porous property was examined by BET (Nora 200E, Quantachrome) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (AutoPore IV 9500, Micromeritics). In addition, Pd@PPM was also examined using Inductive Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES, Optima 5300DV, Perkin-Elmer) and EDS (X-Max50, Oxford) analysis to affirm the presence of Pd. Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) and chemisorption were performed using AutoChem II 2920 for the measurement of Pd dispersion. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was done on a diffractometer (D8 Focus, Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!