The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lumfl

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan

The LUMFL is a high-precision laboratory equipment designed for fluorescence measurement and analysis. The core function of the LUMFL is to accurately detect and quantify fluorescent signals, providing researchers with valuable data for a wide range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using lumfl

1

Particle motion tracking via microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence images were obtained by a confocal fluorescence microscope (IX81, Olympus, Japan) with a 60x 1.1 NA water immersion objective (LUMFL, Olympus, Japan). The bright field images were taken by a CCD camera mounted on the same microscope (XC-ST30, Sony, Japan). Particle motion was captured by the CCD camera at a frame rate of 30 frames/second. Particle position was tracked by ImageJ and further processed by Matlab.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Catalyst Characterization and Electrochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical compositions of the catalysts were characterized using SAED (SAED, TEM mode, JEOL 3010, 300 kV, 112 μA) and Raman spectroscopy (Modular System, Horiba Jobin Yvon). A He–Ne laser was used as the excitation source and the acquisition time was 10 seconds for each spectrum. A dry objective (Olympus MPlan N, 50×, numerical aperture = 0.75) and a water immersion objective (Olympus LUMFL, 60×, numerical aperture = 1.10) were, respectively, employed for ex situ and operando Raman spectroscopy. The morphologies of the catalysts were characterized by SEM (JEOL JSM-6710F, 5 kV). Their electrochemical-active surface areas were determined by their double layer capacitances in N2-saturated 0.1 M KClO4 (99.9%, Sigma Aldrich). A three-electrode setup was used with a Pt wire counter and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode (Saturated KCl, Pine). Cyclic voltammetry were performed in a non-faradaic region from −0.05 V to 0.05 V vs. RHE. The scan rates were 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 mV s−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Situ Raman Spectroscopy for Electrochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

In situ Raman spectroscopy was carried out in a custom-designed H-type cell using a confocal Raman spectrometer (HORIBA, LabRAM HR Evolution). Copper foil coated with CuO-NSs was used as the working electrode with an exposed circular geometric surface area of ∼1 cm2. A platinum wire and an Ag/AgCl electrode (saturated KCl, Gaossunion Co., Ltd., Tianjin) were used as the counter and the reference electrode, respectively. 1.0 M KHCO3 aqueous solution was used as the anolyte and x M K2SO4 + y M KX (X = Cl, Br, I, 2x + y = 1) (Sigma Aldrich, 99%) was used as the catholyte and a bipolar membrane (FBM-PK) was used to separate the cathode and anode chambers. The excitation wavelength source was a visible light laser (532 nm). A water immersion objective lens (LUMFL, Olympus, 60×, numerical aperture: 1.10) was used to focus and collect the incident and scattered laser light. The Raman signal was recorded before, during and after applying potential, using a homemade electrochemical cell. The spectra were collected at OCP or under applied constant current density (−1 mA cm−2). Electrochemical measurements were carried out with a potentiostat (CompactStat.e20250, IVIUM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In-situ Raman Spectroscopy of Electrochemical Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectroscopy was performed with a Lab−RAM HR Raman microscopy system (Horiba Jobin Yvon, HR550) equipped with a 532 nm laser as the excitation source, a water immersion objective (Olympus LUMFL, 60×, numerical aperture = 1.10), a monochromator (1800 grooves/mm grating) and a Synapse CCD detector. Each spectrum is an average of five continuously acquired spectra with a collection time of 50 s each. A three-electrode electrochemical cell was used for in situ Raman tests. Pt wires and Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) were used as counter and reference electrodes, respectively. To protect the objective from the corrosive 0.1 M KOH electrolyte, 0.01 M KOH (pH 12) was used instead. K2SO4 (99.0%) was added to ensure sufficient ionic conductivity (keeping the total concentration of K+ to be 0.1 M) and provides SO42− ions as an external Raman reference. Typically, in the presence of 0.01 M KNO3, the supporting electrolytes were 0.01 M KOH and 0.04 M K2SO4. In the absence of KNO3, the electrolytes were 0.01 M KOH and 0.045 M K2SO4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!