The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using icp multi element standard solution 4

1

Elemental Analysis of Plant Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf samples from June that were previously washed were dried at 60 °C and then homogenized with an electric mixer. For the elemental analysis 0.2 g of the samples was digested in 5 mL 65% (m/m) nitric acid and 1 mL 30% hydrogen peroxide using a microwave digestion unit (Milestone 1200 Mega, Shelton, CO, USA). Digested samples were diluted to 25 mL with deionized water for the analysis [31 (link)]. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES 5110 Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for the elemental analysis. Duck weed (BCR670, Merck, Ltd.) Certified Reference Material (CRM) was used and the recoveries were within 10% of the certified values for the elements. However, in the CRM, only the indicative values for Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn were given. The six-point calibration was applied to ensure high precision measurements. Calibration curve was calculated using a multi-element calibration solution (Merck ICP multi-element standard solution IV). The concentrations of aluminium, barium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, potassium, magnesium, manganese, sodium, nickel, lead, strontium and zinc were measured in the leaf samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrapure Acid Digestion Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrapure 65% HNO3 and 30% HCl were purchased from Ciech Trading (Poland) and used for sample digestion. The ICP multi-element standard solution IV (1.11355.0100) was received from Merck (Darmstadt Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Elemental Analysis of Plant Leaf Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the determination of dust amount and APTI, leaf samples were dried for 24 h at 60 °C, then the samples were homogenised and stored in plastic tubes until pre-treatment. For elemental analysis, 0.2 g of plant tissue was digested using 5 mL 65% (m/m) nitric acid and 1 mL 30% (m/m) hydrogen peroxide. Digested samples were diluted to 25 mL with deionised water [6 (link),8 (link),9 (link),10 (link)]. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES 5110 Agilent Technologies) was used during the elemental analysis of leaf samples (Supplementary Material Table S2). We used six-point calibration procedures with a multi-element calibration solution (Merck ICP multi-element standard solution IV) and measured the concentration of Al, Ba, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, and Zn. Road dust (BCR670) and Peach leaves (1547) CRM were used, and the recoveries were within 10% of the certified values for the elements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Metal Analysis of Catalytic Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metal analysis was done using ICP-OES. For sample preparation, 0.12 mg and 0.24 mg of catalytic and reductase components, respectively, were dissolved in 0.5 ml of trace metal grade concentrated nitric acid and incubated for 12 h at 25 °C. Subsequently, the samples were boiled for 2 h at 90 °C before they were diluted 17-fold in distilled water. The metal content was analyzed with a 720/725 ICP-OES device (Agilent Technologies) on iron (λ = 238.204 nm), molybdenum (λ = 202.032 nm), nickel (λ = 216.555 nm) and zinc (λ = 213.857 nm). The device was operated with ICP Expert v4.1.0 software (Agilent Technologies). All analyzed metals were quantified using ICP multi-element standard solution IV (Merck) as a standard. The results were plotted using GraphPad Prism v9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Elemental Analysis of Samples by ICP-OES

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 0.5 g of a fine powder of each sample was wet-oxidized with 10 mL of ultra-pure HNO3 (67% v/v) in a closed MARS 6 - Microwave Accelerated Reaction System (Smith Farm Road, Matthews, NC, USA). The analyses were carried out using an ICP-OES system (iCAP™ 7400 Duo ICP-OES Analyzer, Thermo Scientific™, Germany) equipped with Thermo Scientific™ Qtegra™ Intelligent Scientific Data Solution™ (ISDS) software (Thermo Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA). Quality assurance and quality control were assessed using an ICP multi-element standard solution IV (23 elements, 1000 mg/L) (Merck KGaA, Germany). A Periodic table mix 1 for ICP TraceCERT® (Merck KGaA, Germany) was employed, 33 elements were used as a standard and results were expressed as mg/Kg of FW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multielement analysis of environmental samples by ICP-OES and MP-AES

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The determination of Al, As, Ba, B, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S, and Zn was carried out by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, IRIS Intrepid II XSP), while the concentration of Li and Sr was determined by microwave plasma atomic emission spectrometry (MP-AES 4100, Agilent Technologies). The certificated material used was ERM-CZ120. The recovery for all elements was under 5 %.
Six-point calibration solution series were diluted from multi-element calibration stock solution of 1,000 mg l−1 (Merck ICP multi-element standard solution IV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Inorganic Metals in Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 20 mg of tissue samples were analyzed by ICP-AES as previously described21 . Briefly, frozen samples were pulverized in liquid N2 and kept immersed in 1.5 mL 60% HNO3 at room temperature for 16 h. The sample suspension was subsequently subjected to wet ashing under the following conditions: 105 °C for 2 h, 160 °C for 16 h with 0.2 mL of 30% H2O2. After cooling down the solution was messed up to 10 g and then filtered. The resultant sample solutions were analyzed using an ICP instrument (Vista-Pro, Seiko Instruments/Varian Instruments, Chiba, Japan). The detection limits of each element were described in Table S1. The concentration of each inorganic metal was quantified using a calibration curve for the standard solution (ICP multi-element standard solution IV, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Resultant data were expressed as the mean ± 2 × standard error (2 S.E.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Trace Metal Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the transition metal concentrations, nasal samples and culture media were acidified by adding 1% final volume 65% HNO3- in a final volume of 3 mL. Analyses were performed using a model X series I ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or on the iCAP-RQ ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Cu2+, Co2+, Zn2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ca2+ levels were measured in all samples. ICP-MS calibration was performed using ICP multi-element standard solution IV (Merck) ranging from 1 to 100 ppb. Quality control was run using 100 ppb ICP multi-element standard VIII (Merck) and 500 ppb Scandium was used as internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Determination of Major and Trace Elements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to determine the major (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Zn) and trace element concentrations (Co, Cr, Mn, Ni, Ba, Sr, Rb), an Xpert closed-vessel system (Berghof, Eningen, Germany) was used for sample digestion. Here, 200 mg of sample was digested using 10 mL HNO3 65% and 2 mL H2O2 30% in polytetrafluoroethylene digestion vessels, using a four-step digestion program (120 °C and 170 °C—heating; 100 °C and 25 °C—cooling) for a total digestion time of 25 min. After, the vessels were cooled down and the volume was made up with ultrapure water to 20 mL. The resulting solutions were analyzed using an Optima 5300DV inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) for the determination of the major elements, and an ELAN DRC II inductively coupled plasma quadrupole mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, Perkin–Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) for the determination of the minor elements. The calibration standards were prepared from ICP Multi-Element Standard Solution IV (1000 mg/L) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for the ICP-OES and Multi-Element Calibration Standard 3 (10 mg/L) (Perkin Elmer Pure Plus, Waltham, MA, USA) at appropriate dilutions. The detection limits for the ICP-OES and ICP-MS are mentioned in the Supplementary Files, Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Elemental Analysis of Tea Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The major and trace elements were determined using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission Perkin Elmer Optima 5300DV (ICP-OES) spectrometer after microwave-assisted digestion using a Berghof Xpert system. An amount of 500 mg of ground tea was digested using 4 mL of HNO3 at 65% and 6 mL of H2O2 at 30% in polytetrafluoroethylene digestion vessels using a four-step digestion program (145, 170, and 190 °C—heating; 50 °C—cooling) for a total digestion time of 40 min. Subsequently, the vessels were cooled down, and the volume was made up to the mark with ultrapure water. Blanks were prepared for each lot of samples. The calibration standards were prepared from Merck ICP multi-element standard solution IV, 1000 mg/L (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Mn, and Zn), and a mono-element standard solution, 1000 mg/L P. The accuracy in determining the major and trace element concentrations in tea samples was evaluated via NIST SRM 1515 Apple Leaves, achieving satisfactory recoveries (%) of K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Zn, and P (85.6–105.3%). The total nitrogen (N) was determined by combustion using a Flash EA 2000 CHNS/O analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!