The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Force sensing tandem treadmill

Manufactured by Amti
Sourced in United States

The force-sensing tandem treadmill is a laboratory equipment designed to measure the forces generated during walking or running. It features two separate treadmill belts that can be operated independently or in tandem, allowing for the analysis of individual limb forces. The equipment is equipped with force sensors that capture the vertical, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral forces exerted by the user during locomotion.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using force sensing tandem treadmill

1

Treadmill Walking Gait Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experimental procedures were based on the procedures of Kurz et al. [23 (link)]. Participants were asked to complete a forward and a backward walking session on a treadmill for this experiment (AMTI Force Sensing Tandem Treadmill; AMTI, Watertown, Massachusetts). There were five trials in each session, where each trial consisted of standing still for 30 seconds and walking at 0.45 m/s for 30 seconds. Since there were no breaks in between trials, each session lasted exactly five minutes. The order of the forward walking session and backward walking session was randomized for each participant. In order to maintain head position, participants held onto handrails and kept their gaze fixed on a fixation cross at eye-level throughout the trials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Running Biomechanics: Treadmill Gait Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants who met the study criteria and provided written consent underwent a baseline running biomechanics assessment. They were asked to run on an instrumented treadmill (AMTI force sensing tandem treadmill, Watertown, MA, USA) at 8 km/h (slow pace) and 12 km/h (fast pace) for five minutes with their usual running shoes.
The test sequence was randomized using an online program (www.random.org) and there was a 5-minute rest period between the two running trials.
Ground reaction force data was sampled at 1,000 Hz for the last minute of the run.
Data were then filtered using a second order, recursive Butterworth, lowpass filter at 50 Hz. A threshold of 10 N in the vertical ground reaction force was used to determine foot strike and toe off. The VALR and VILR were obtained by the method described in a previous study. 14 (link) In brief, VALR and VILR were the average and maximum slopes of the line through the 20% point and the 80% point of the vertical impact peak, respectively. In the case with an undetectable or absence of vertical impact peak within one stance phase, the vertical impact peak value would be taken as the force at 13% stance phase. 6 (link) Both VALR and VILR were normalized by body weight (BW) and averaged across all footfalls within the one-minute trial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biomechanics of Barefoot Running Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following a 3-min warm up period and familiarization procedure, participants ran barefoot on a force-instrumented treadmill (AMTI, force-sensing tandem treadmill, Watertown, MA, USA) at 2.8 m.s -1 with their habitual foot-strike (HFS) pattern and a forefoot strike pattern (FFS), in a counter-balanced order. During the familiarization session, foot-strike pattern was confirmed by the investigator, using visual analysis. None of the participants displayed a habitual forefoot running technique. Prior to commencement of each experimental condition, participants were given as much time as necessary to familiarize themselves with running on the treadmill with a forefoot strike pattern. Participants were considered familiarized with the forefoot running technique once they were able to perform 20 seconds of consecutive forefoot strikes at the experimental speed and reported to be comfortable running with this technique. Foot-strike pattern during the familiarisation period was confirmed visually by the investigator (LK).
Kinetic, kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected simultaneously for approximately 15-20 strides (toe-off to ipsilateral toe-off) across a 15 s data collection period for each running condition (HFS and FFS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

3D Gait Analysis at Preferred Walking Speed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 12 high-speed camera system operating at 480Hz (Motion Analysis Corp., Santa Rosa, CA) recorded the three-dimensional position of 27 reflective markers placed bilaterally on: 1) anterior superior iliac spines, 2) posterior superior iliac spines, 3) greater trochanters, 4) midlateral thighs, 5) lower front thighs, 6) lateral knees, 7) tibial tubercles, 8) lower lateral shanks, 9) lateral ankles, 10) top of the second metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, 11) posterior heels, 12) lateral fifth MTPs, and 13) lateral calcanei. An additional single marker was placed on the sacrum. The subjects were walking at their preferred walking speed (PWS) on a treadmill (AMTI force-sensing tandem treadmill). Prior to the data collection, the preferred walking speed of the subjects were established by increasing and decreasing the speed of the treadmill above and below what the subjects reported as being comfortable. The average speed was 1.17 ± 0.23 m/s. The subject walked for 10 minutes during which data was collected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Load Carriage Training for Military Recruits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants representative of a military recruit population ( 23) completed a 10-wk load carriage-specific physical training program. Lower-body strength, local muscular endurance, and cardiorespiratory endurance were measured before and after a 10-wk training intervention, with perceptual and HR responses assessed during loaded marching task. The load carriage marching task was equivalent to the Australian Army minimum physical employment standards for incumbents ( 23) and was conducted on a force-instrumented treadmill (AMTI force-sensing tandem treadmill, Watertown, MA). A short familiarization session was conducted within the week before the load carriage task, which required participants to walk for 5 min on a treadmill at 5.5 km•h -1 wearing a 23-kg weighted vest. Weight was distributed evenly between the front and back of the torso-borne vest (IronEdge; Power Vest).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gait Retraining for Landing Stiffness Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants in the gait retraining group received a 2-week gait retraining for landing stiffness modulation according to the protocol established in a previous study. 12 (link) In brief, they participated in eight sessions of gait modification over two weeks (four sessions per week). During the training, participants were asked to run at a self-selected speed on an instrumented treadmill (AMTI force sensing tandem treadmill, Watertown, MA, USA).
Visual biofeedback in the form of vertical ground reaction force signal from the treadmill was displayed on the monitor in front. Participants were asked to "run softer" so that the amplitude of vertical impact peak would be reduced or even diminished (Figure 1). The training time was gradually increased from 15 minutes to 30 minutes over the eight sessions and visual feedback was progressively removed in the last four sessions (Figure 2). The participants were then advised to maintain their new gait pattern during their daily living or regular running practice after the training. Similar to the gait retraining group, participants in the control group were invited to the laboratory for eight times in two weeks. They were asked to run on an instrumented treadmill at a self-pace speed but no feedback of their running biomechanics was provided. The running time was identical to the protocol in the gait retraining group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Biomechanical Analysis of Resistance Exercises

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To perform the warm-up and control intensity a treadmill AMTI Force sensing tandem treadmill (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) and RS polar RS 100 (Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland) was used.
Bar velocity was measured using a linear transducer sampling at 1000 Hz (T-Force System, Ergotech, Murcia, Spain) connected to a 16-bit analogue to digital converter (Biopac MP100 Systems Santa Barbara, CA, USA).
The T-force System was interfaced with a personal computer to automatically calculate the relevant kinematic and kinetic parameters for every repetition, providing real-time feedback and data storage. To standardise the starting joint configurations in each repetition, the knee joint angle was measured using an electrogoniometer (Penny & Gilles, Biometrics Ltd., Blackwood Ltd., London UK). The Full Squat and Half Squat exercises were conducted using a Smith machine (Multipower Fitness Line, Peroga, Spain), while for the Leg Press a custom-built 45º leg press machine was used. ******Insert Figure 1 near hereinstrumentation*****
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!