The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

710 es spectrometer

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Australia

The 710-ES spectrometer is a compact and versatile instrument designed for elemental analysis. It utilizes inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) technology to provide accurate and reliable measurements of a wide range of elements in various sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using 710 es spectrometer

1

Gadolinium Content Determination by ICP-OES

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of the gadolinium content in a sample was performed by ICP-OES analysis with a Varian 710-ES spectrometer. Before measuring Gd3+ concentration, samples of colloidal solution were dissolved in HNO3 67 % at 80 °C for 2 h. The samples were then diluted 10-fold in HNO3 5 %. Chemical analysis were also performed on the as-prepared samples at the Service Central d’Analyses du CNRS (Villeurbanne, France) by ICP-MS and enabled determining the C, N, Si contents with a precision of 0.5 %.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gadolinium Content Determination by ICP-AES

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of the gadolinium content in a sample was performed by ICP-AES analysis (with a Varian 710-ES spectrometer). Before measuring gadolinium concentration, samples of colloidal solution were dissolved in concentrated nitric acid for 24 hours. The samples were then diluted with water, until the nitric acid concentration in water reached 5%. Chemical analyses were also performed on the as-prepared samples at the Service Central d’Analyses du CNRS (Solaize, France) by ICP-AES, and enabled determining the C, N, Si contents with a precision of 0.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ICP-OES Analysis of Elemental Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of the elements was determined using ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy) with a Varian 710-ES spectrometer (Varian, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia). Calibration curves were prepared using standard solutions supplied by Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Water was purified by a Millipore Elix 10 system.
A WU-4 universal shaker (Premed, Warsaw, Poland), WPE 120 electronic balance (Radwag, Radom, Poland), WPA 60/C analytical balance (Radwag, Radom, Poland), and pH-meter Basic 20+ (Crison Instruments, Barcelona, Spain) were used during the batch studies.
Peristaltic pump (Ismatec Reglo Digital, Cole-Parmer GmbH, Wertheim, Germany) was used for pumping the solution through the bed in the column studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chitosan Bio-composite Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Boron and cerium were determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) with a Varian 710-ES spectrometer (Varian, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia). The following parameters were used: radio frequency (RF) power 1.0 kW, plasma flow 15 dm3/min, auxiliary flow 1.5 dm3/min, nebuliser pressure 200 kPa, pump rate 15 rpm and emission lines: λ = 208.956, λ = 249.678 and λ = 249.772 nm (for boron) and λ = 407.347, λ = 407.570, λ = 418.659 and λ = 446.021 nm (for cerium). Calibration curves were prepared using standard solutions in the ranges of 0.1–1.5 mg/dm3 and 0.1–5 mg/dm3 for boron and cerium, respectively. The changes in the chitosan structure were determined by a Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) Spectrum Two spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs of the chitosan bio-composite were produced using a Phenom ProX SEM (Phenom-World Bv, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The phase compositions of the chitosan-based samples were determined using a Seifert 3003TT powder X-ray diffractometer with a Cu X-ray tube: kλ1 = 1.540598 Å, kλ2 = 1.544426 Å and kβ = 1.39225 Å (Seifert, Ahrensburg, Germany). Powder samples were analysed three times, and the XRD patterns presented in the manuscript were an average of the scans between 10 and 90° 2Theta.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Elemental Release from Biomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tests were carried out in an incubator at 37 °C in 20 mL
of Ringer solution on a shaker at 60 rpm for 12 weeks. The release
of Ti, Ca, and P was determined with inductively coupled plasma-optical
emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) with a Varian 710-ES spectrometer
(Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) using parameters as described.17 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Iron Content in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantitate the iron content in the collected lesion and muscle tissues, samples were dried, weighed, and digested with 69% nitric acid (TraceSELECT™, Fluka, St. Louis, MO, USA) at room temperature. The iron content in each sample was determined through inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) utilizing a 710-ES spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Blank nitric acid and calibration samples containing a predetermined iron concentration were prepared using TraceCERT® Iron (Fe) Standard for ICP (1000 mg/L Fe in nitric acid, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and analyzed alongside the test tissue samples. Measurements were carried out in triplicate, and the resulting data were normalized to the dry tissue weight and presented as mean ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Trace Element Release from Anodized Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anodized samples were placed separately in Falcon tubes, each with 20 mL of Ringer solution. The samples were shaken at 60 rpm and incubated at 37 °C (incubator POL-EKO, Wodzisław Śląski, Poland) for up to 6 weeks. After each 2-week period, the content of niobium, phosphorus, zirconium, calcium, and silver released into the Ringer solution was determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). A Varian 710-ES spectrometer (Santa Clara, USA). equipped with a OneNeb nebulizer was utilized. The parameters were as follows: RF power 1.0 kW, plasma flow 15 L min−1, auxiliary flow 1.5 L min−1, nebulizer pressure 210 kPa, pump rate 15 rpm; emission lines of Nb:λ = 295.088 and 294.154 nm, P:λ = 213.618, Zr:λ = 343.823 and 327.307 nm, Ca:λ = 317.933 and 422.673 nm, and Ag:λ = 328.068 and 338.289 nm. The calibration curve method was applied. The calibration curves were prepared using a matrix (Ringer solution) at the same concentration as that of the samples. Single element standard solutions of 1 and 10 mg mL−1 (zirconium) supplied by Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany) were used. Deionized water was prepared using a Millipore Elix 10 system (Darmstadt, Germany). The obtained results are the average of concentrations obtained for all used analytical lines with the standard deviation not exceeding 1.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Gadolinium in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantitate gadolinium content in the collected lesions and muscle tissues, samples were dried, weighed, and digested with 69% nitric acid (TraceSELECT™, Fluka, USA). Samples were then diluted further to 4% nitric acid and filtered to obtain a solution with no visible debris. Gadolinium content was determined for each sample by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) using a 710-ES spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA). For all ICP-OES measurements, blank nitric acid, and samples with known Gd concentration as calibration were prepared and tested concurrently with test tissue samples. All measurements were carried out in triplicates, and the data were normalized to the dry tissue weight and reported as mean ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!